There was rough policing, its been reported. You might disagree with it which Im fine with. Who are you "we" ing yourself with? Ah nevermind, cant be arsed.
If you cant stop commenting on me and my secret "agenda" then stop replying. stick to the real issues, they are far more important and interesting. On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Mark Humphries < [email protected]> wrote: > Oh, and the group that hijacked the march is irrelevant. As is whether you > have actually voted, we all know you have a political agenda.**** > > ** ** > > The facts remain that the looting has nothing to do with the shooting and > there was no “rough” policing at the march, so undermines your > argument/opinion a tad.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Eric B [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 10 August 2011 12:10 > > *To:* Mark Humphries > *Cc:* McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill); leedslist > *Subject:* Re: [LU] Riots**** > > ** ** > > Just cause I got the timelines does not make any difference to my > statements. **** > > Me political agenda? you re having a laff mate, I ve never voted in my > life. I bet you have. **** > > ** ** > > You *"heard"* it was the anarchist lot that started this? and then you ask > me to get my facts right? **** > > Well I heard my aunty has got balls, but guess what.. it wasnt true.. DOH! > **** > > ** ** > > Keep it real mate, **** > > Eric**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mark Humphries < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > What happened was there was a protest march for the shooting, this was a > peaceful march and the policing was anything but rough – the police had a > very small presence precisely to prevent antagonism. What then happened was > a bunch of idiots (I have heard it was the anarchist lot) hijacked the march > and started the violence.**** > > **** > > But don’t let the facts get in the way of your political agenda!**** > > **** > > *From:* Eric B [mailto:[email protected]] **** > > *Sent:* 10 August 2011 11:20 > *To:* Mark Humphries**** > > *Cc:* McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill); leedslist > *Subject:* Re: [LU] Riots**** > > **** > > I am not TRYING to link it to the guy that got shot. I am actually. I dont > think its a coincidence he got shot by the police the same day this started. > But thats my opinion only. Apparently another trigger was rough policing to > a peaceful protest that demanded justice. Maybe its a clue that rough > policing will trigger further violent escalations? **** > > **** > > From a legal point of view anybody with a local passport is a citizen. *** > * > > Citizen: "A legally recognized subject or national of a state or > commonwealth, either native or naturalized."**** > > **** > > However I take your point this has been abused by a vast majority of people > who are not linked to the initial incident. A bit like hooligans that go to > football games to pick a fight, not to watch football. **** > > I also agree that waving a shooting arm at police is asking for trouble. I > wouldnt want to be the police officer having to make that call. **** > > **** > > Cheers, **** > > Eric**** > > **** > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Mark Humphries < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > I wouldn't call the people who are looting and rioting as "citizens". > > Luckily it seems to be being brought under control now, but if it wasn't > then there is a very good risk of some of us citizens standing up to them > ourselves, and that could indeed be called a civil war. > > And again, let's not try and link what is happening with the shooting in > Tottenham, it is totally unrelated and the vast majority of those looting > wouldn't even know the blokes name. The bloke who was shot was waving > around a firearm, so let's also not infer that this was another innocent > victim or police brutality.**** > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On**** > > Behalf Of Eric B > Sent: 10 August 2011 10:27 > To: McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill)**** > > Cc: leedslist > Subject: Re: [LU] Riots**** > > maybe they re not using plastic bullets because they dont want to risk > killing kids? After all this did start by someone being shot by the police. > tear gas wont kill anyone so maybe thats a better idea. > > I note that quite a few people wants the army involved however I d say that > putting the army against your own citizens is similar to a civil war in > many > respects. > I understand these are riots but hey... Hence I agree this is a job for the > police and not the army. > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, McWilliams, Brendan, VF-Group (bmcwill) < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > **** > > ** ** > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
