On Saturday 20 October 2001 16:42, you wrote:
> Hi Erik!
>
> >> Well, UNIX was a good command line OS, but now is time is over. We all
>
> need
>
> >> gui to simplify our work, and it's not really important if it's
> >> administrative work or office work, or better multimedia work.

i'm sure we all respect eachother's opinions, but you're being an ass. the 
simple fact is that not EVERY task needs a desktop. in fact *nix does have 
better availability (longer uptimes) than windows (unless you're not doing 
anything). linux/unix is more customizable and better suited to certain 
tasks. hell, my windows box crashes about 5 times a week because it has 
trouble recovering from sleep. actually it's crasshed right now. hmmm.. 
clearly windows has some problems too.

it's also ridiculous to keep mentioning *professional* software. i'm a 
software engineer. i've worked on projects where we had to extend existing 
*professional* software and it was crap. really. worse than anything that's 
ever been in the linux kernel or driver set. another simple fact: 
professional does not imply quality. oh, and by the way, since you seem to 
think that price implies quality. the piece of shit program i worked on sold 
for about $5,000 (us dollars). it was terrible, buggy, poorly written, bad 
gui, bad serial interfacing. oh. and it ran on windows. high quality my ass.

> All this thread started becouse someone say that IrDA under Linux is better
> than IrDA under Windows and that's not true, this is something that
> probably make laugh also the people that develop IrDA stack under Linux.

you're reading comprehension or understanding of the original statement 
isn't very good. this is now the 3rd i'm going to list my problems with the 
windows irda stack. it doesn't support comprehensive IAS manipulation (get, 
set, query, delete). you can't change the default device name. it doesn't 
have an event oriented discovery api. therefore, it is less functional than 
the linux irda stack. and microsoft has made no moves to update it or change 
it - that i have heard about.

> You hate them? I LOVE IT!!!!! I want gui!!! I like windows and colourful
> things!!! i play guitar, I record music on my various systems, I do DTP and
> I love all that great gui's!!! :-))))) It's 2001 and not 1980!!!
>
> Computer geeks that think and act like they are/was in the past, were the
> problem also for Windows: Microsoft had lots of boring Unix programmers
> writing code to wank on it ... LOL LOL LOL...

yes. you are officially a user and have fully demonstrated your complete lack 
of understanding about software development and operating systems principles. 
i believe that you have just earned alot of respect from the people who 
develop your free software by blatantly insulting their ideology, competency, 
and work.

everybody else,

i'm sorry for asking such a critical question and starting this rant thread.

Andrew Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda

Reply via email to