Philip Newton wrote: > Oh, all right. Thanks to Neil and Simon for the correction. I suppose this > misapprehension comes partly because it *used* to be two dialing codes (071, > 081 -- or was it 0171, 0181? Or both, one after the other? I forget). It was origially 01 ne c'est pas? Then it changed to 071 (Inner London) and 081 (Greater London) then it changed to 0171 and 0181 and then finally to 020 7xxx and 020 8xxx - what people don't seem to realises is that theoretically someone could move in next to me and where I have a number that starts 020 7xxx they could actually have 020 4xxx.
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Neil Ford
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wistow
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Piers Cawley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written... Chris Benson
- RE: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Clarke, Darren
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wistow
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Robert Shiels
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Paul Mison
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Wri... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Wri... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... David Cantrell
