Neil Ford wrote: > I suppose I'd be splitting hairs if I pointed out that the > dialing code for London is 020, meaning numbers should be > shown as 020 xxxx xxxx. Oh, all right. Thanks to Neil and Simon for the correction. I suppose this misapprehension comes partly because it *used* to be two dialing codes (071, 081 -- or was it 0171, 0181? Or both, one after the other? I forget). Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Wri... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Neil Ford
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wistow
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Piers Cawley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written... Chris Benson
- RE: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Clarke, Darren
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wistow
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Robert Shiels
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Paul Mison
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Wri... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Wri... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badl... Chris Benson