On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:56 -0300, Enrique Verdes wrote: > I get my LPIC 1 in 2003, and, based on my experience, I can't see that > by 2008 I'll be doing things in any way differently than today. > ¿There's a real need for recertification every 5 years? ¿Are you > seeing anything I can't? I can buy the "continuing education" thing. > In fact, I'm planning to get LPIC2 anytime during 2007, and other > certifications as well, if my mind doesn't blows in the process, but > the thing is, in 5 years, how much of the knowledge tested to get > LPIC-1, or LPC-2, if its the case, will change so significantly that > will be obsolete and not usefull?
I have to lend some interest in this here, because offering some means of "continuing education" that is purely not a "retake" is ideal IMPO. That's why I'm hopeful for the "specializations." I'm taking a "wait'n see" approach. > IMHO, this is what should have been discussing, and not the semantics > of the word "INACTIVE" Oh very much agreed. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
