Bear Giles <[email protected]> wrote: > What about bastion hosts? I know some allow transparent SSH forwarding but > aren't many configured to prohibit forwarding? You have to drop into a > shell on the bastion and establish connections from it. >
Well, I do think we're getting beyond LPIC-1 and even 'common' setups. [OT] Anecdotal: Although nothing is more frustrating than a Windows, let alone Azure, jump host. I usually find the solution is to force a VMware or Windows admin to use even just 'nano' over such a connection, versus SSH jump (or even socks proxy). They quickly 'change their tune' on the solution. Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> wrote: > Vi is like chemotherapy. It's a nasty business. There are legitimate > situations where there's really no alternative to chemotherapy but that > doesn't mean everyone should have it all the time. > So why not just yank it then? If we're going to go from 2nd highest to absolute lowest, of which there are so _few_ 'Weight: 1' items already, why not just yank it altogether? That's why started this thread, hence ... G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the comments from various people, though, there are no zeros > for vi...so, unless people want to follow up on Bryan's break-fix vs > rebuild-fix topic (which is what I think he was trying to do in this > through)... > If it's just a matter of how much vi to test, our individual opinions don't > matter here. The next JTA will take care of that. Past JTAs have even > eliminated entire objectives. > Definitely JTA this. Because if interactive/visual text editing is going to go from being ... - Weighted 2nd highest, in the top 10 objectives To being ... - Weighted the absolute lowest, in the bottom 5 objectives Then why bother with it? And possibly then question even everything 'interactive' as secondary? We're certainly at that point for 2020+. - bjs
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
