On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:03 PM Simone Piccardi <[email protected]> wrote:
> you need vi only when there is nothing else you can use. > This here, Simone. I think "pro-vi" point is that this situation still comes up often enough to want people comfortable with vi before the emergency arises. Looking at the comments from various people, though, there are no zeros for vi...so, unless people want to follow up on Bryan's break-fix vs rebuild-fix topic (which is what I think he was trying to do in this through)... > I think I made my point clear: ask a question to be sure a person is > capable to edit a file with vi where there is nothing else, and do not > pretend to test the importance of text editing testing about vi. > If it's just a matter of how much vi to test, our individual opinions don't matter here. The next JTA will take care of that. Past JTAs have even eliminated entire objectives. Take care, --matt -- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: 0x17CF9077 Executive Director, Linux Professional Institute
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
