Il 07/08/19 02:58, Bryan J Smith ha scritto:
Are you sure? Ergo ...
You use the text editor of your choice.
Do any of us have a choice? In today's 'minimal install by default'
secure world?
When there is only vi you must be capable to use it. But that's do no
means that a sysadmin must use always use vi to do editing.
It seems to me that you are telling that if you don't *always* use vi to
do editing you cannot be a proficient sysadmin. That's not true. Beeing
not a vi fan and a proficient enough sysadmin I know enough of vi to be
capable to edit files when only vi is present, but I don't need and
don't want to use vi in the other cases where I can use an editor I like
better.
All your examples of vi unaware sysadmins difficulties do not apply. You
must be aware of vi, and we need to text that in LPI. But for this a
weight 1 is correct, 3 is excessive.
As we are discussing, this seems to me more and more a rite of passage.
And not in the sense of a common knowledge shared by people, but like an
initiation to be part of the sect of the "vi only editing" sysadmin.
Simone
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev