Il 07/08/19 18:17, Bryan J Smith ha scritto:
Simone Piccardi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
When there is only vi you must be capable to use it.
Which is why it's in the objectives, as long as 'interactive' and 'text
editing' is a reality we (LPI) test, then that's unavoidable. And it's
one of the primary objectives, because text editing is so critical. A
weight of 1 treats it as a minor need.
But that's do no means that a sysadmin must use always use vi to do
editing.
It seems to me that you are telling that if you don't *always* use
vi to
do editing you cannot be a proficient sysadmin. That's not true.
Where did I ever say that? Please point it out. And that the problem
here ...
Just before. There you said:
> And it's
> one of the primary objectives, because text editing is so critical. A
> weight of 1 treats it as a minor need.
I want a weigth of 1 on vi, not in text editing. They are not the same,
but just here you talk about them like they are the same. They are not,
you need vi only when there is nothing else you can use.
I think I made my point clear: ask a question to be sure a person is
capable to edit a file with vi where there is nothing else, and do not
pretend to test the importance of text editing testing about vi.
Simone
--
Simone Piccardi Truelite Srl
[email protected] (email/jabber) Via Monferrato, 6
Tel. +39-347-1032433 50142 Firenze
http://www.truelite.it Tel. +39-055-7879597
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev