-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Sandra Dolan wrote:
| I think we should consider calling this program something besides certification or a certificate to increase the distinction between this and our "real" certifications. A group I worked with before tried to make this distinction at one point and it is still causing confusion today. | | Perhaps we might name it: award or letter of proficiency or special | proficiency award/letter of merit award/letter of special | qualifications award/letter of qualification letter of distinction | aptitude award award/letter of competence.
Of these I like the idea of referring to it as the "LinuxCore Qualification". This is something that we will need to take to our advisers and international friends to ensure that what we do will be usable in most countries.
| Sound reasonable? Maybe someone more creative than I could come up | with some really snazzy name.
I think we're more interested in functional than snazzy. In the conventional IT certification world, the search for "snazzy" has led to problems such as the misappropriation of the term "engineer". It's my belief that we neither need nor want to go down that same path.
- - Evan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAycDCEaxkgziIBO8RAvE9AJ46B5z8mUBQTRLlEsqlJcOMdo9TNQCgkiG5 VjkEM1IiK6gcTbNog1W0VD8= =GLeP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
