I've been following this thread with great interest, as LAMP is clearly
important to both CIW and LPI. There are some possibilities here that would
benefit the community. I think that cooperation can help get exams out
faster and to a larger audience.

James


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] RE: OSS developer certs anyone? -- Prosoft
Trainingconsideration?


> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Let them CIW have a "LAMP" cert until LPI could fill in all the holes
> >> and then announce an LPI LAMP cert?  It could piss CIW off.
>
> I don't think LPI's reputation would be enhanced by partnering with
> someone then usurping that space with it's own test. My preferrence would
> be to create our own tests with community support. Partnering should
> create some sort of synergy and not just create a stop gap measure. A
> partnership with the CIW people would not really create any value. A
> partnership with the Perl community (for example) and someone like
> ActiveState (for example) would because we would be creating a new value
> added service.
>
> >> I'm taking the long-term view that even if it takes a year or two to
launch
> >> a full LPI-lead LAMP cert, so be it.  Launch what we can do, as we do
> >> it.  Even with 2 years, we'd still be certifying Perl6 people before
> >> Perl6 came out <muahahaha>.
> >
> > So, until then, CIW's existing Perl 5 exam could fit the bill.
>
> For my conversations the Perl community doesn't seem to be impressed with
> any existing programs. The message to me was they wanted something new and
> credible to the community.
>
> I'm in favor of an approach that builds community interest, works with
> existing bodies in those communities, leverages partnerships to create
> value and not just a stop gap, and has solid community support and
> credibility.
>
> TO build community cred we need to work on a consensus and not just
> present them with a fait accompli.
>
> Mark Miller
> Exam Dev Lead Level 1
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to