"Bryan J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ FYI, I'm a "traditional engineer" that believes strongly in protecting > the "public trust" in any title. ]
ditto. > Hey, maybe push then into changing their format when they rev their > exams next year. I hope. > I don't think it was well accepted, even though I really went in depth > in breaking down the exam. I eventually gave up before publishing my 6 > page outline, because I seemingly was the only guy. Nah, I just wasn't vocal on the list about it. I have been pushing that idea to LPI 'insiders', though. Sounds like we're pretty much on the same page about things. That's cool. Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix, thornhill, ontario, ca phone: 905-771-0017 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
