Interesting. I wonder if I should put this or similar items into my bibliography. This is a Marxist advocating the Popperian approach as a way of circumventing doctrinal rigidification. Can you think of other Marxists who have taken this road?
At 07:41 PM 4/1/2008, Jim Farmelant wrote: > >On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:19:46 +0900 CeJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Popper at one time had wanted to join the Circle and was evidently > > very envious of the admiration Wittgenstein received from them > > (though > > by most accounts, Wittgenstein did not see himself as engaged in > > their > > scientific world view and did not encourage their acclaim of him). > > > > Here is a nice summing up of Popper, especially if you follow it up > > with a bit of Lakatos and Feyerabend. : > > > > http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/ > > > ] > >Me on Richard W. Miller and Popper >http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2004w52/msg00209.htm > >Also, my discussion of Alex Callinocos's usages >of Popper can be found at: >http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2005w48/msg00247.htm _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
