I didn't reprimand, I noted that you made a wide open statement. They were 
still discussing Love in relation to the presence or absence of Eros. You said 
love could be used to justify or condemn anything. True, but not apropos. No 
reprimand, only observation. My apologies if it felt like more than that.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

--- Begin Message ---
Specifically #s 60 & 61.
They were discussing the nature of Love without any sexual implication
(eros?).
That is what you reprimanded me for.

peace & Love

On May 5, 3:34 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you be more specific? Rigsy denied the presence of Eros, then admitted 
> she had been just as much in its sway as the rest of us, and described its 
> function as artistic muse. Rosey and Molly have talked at length about 
> re-awakening Eros in a tepid marriage. I'm still not sure what posts you're 
> referring to.
>
>
>
> [ Attached Message ]From:Tinker <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> <[email protected]>Date:Tue, 5 May 2009 12:13:37 -0700 
> (PDT)Local:Tues, May 5 2009 3:13 pmSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the 
> nature of Love?
>
> Those immediately preceding our exchange.
>
> peace & Love
>
> On May 5, 10:45 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I didn't note any of the ladies straying off Eros. Which posts seemed to do 
> > so?
>
> > [ Attached Message ]From:Tinker <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> > <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 17:13:46 -0700 
> > (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 8:13 pmSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the 
> > nature of Love?
>
> > I suppose it was eros that caused you to jump to the defense of the
> > ladies going off topic :-)
>
> > peace & Love
>
> > On May 4, 7:46 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Of course they have. I'm simply noting that much like Arch's observations 
> > > on codependency, your statement, although accurate, isn't really an 
> > > example of Eros at play.
>
> > > [ Attached Message ]From:Tinker <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> > > <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 16:30:50 -0700 
> > > (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 7:30 pmSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the 
> > > nature of Love?
>
> > > 'My' comments have been about the nature of Love.
>
> > > peace & love
>
> > > On May 4, 7:21 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > But the whole point here, Tink, was that this wasn't about debate, or
> > > > argument, but about opinion, and feeling, and how that translates into
> > > > lifestyle. I don't care about justification or condemnation. I'm more
> > > > interested in what it means and feels like to other people. You, along
> > > > with everyone else here, have been providing that. Analyzing it now as
> > > > some sort of qualitative position fails the point of the topic, which
> > > > is an open ended question, not a position. Peace and Love, my friend.
>
> > > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > One can adopt a point of view, with Love, to justify or condemn
> > > > > anything.
>
> > > > > peace & Love
>
> > > > > On May 4, 7:12 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> ...and thus the discussion of the nature of Love. I'm sure Hinckley
> > > > >> would have something to contribute to the conversation.
>
> > > > >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> > Love can be a powerful source for murder in the mind of a psycho.
>
> > > > >> > peace & Love
>
> > > > >> > On May 4, 7:02 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> 
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >> ...and yet Love can be a powerful source for all these things.
>
> > > > >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> 
> > > > >> >> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> > I would think the 'exploding in the arts' would be better 
> > > > >> >> > classified
> > > > >> >> > as insight, inspiration or revelation rather than Love.
>
> > > > >> >> > peace & Love
>
> > > > >> >> > On May 4, 6:28 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> Yes. It explodes in the arts. Have done the whole trip- 
> > > > >> >> >> painting,
> > > > >> >> >> music, needlearts, poetry, gardening, cooking, diplomas. It 
> > > > >> >> >> still
> > > > >> >> >> doesn't cure a lost heart. I am now a hermitess living in a 
> > > > >> >> >> grand
> > > > >> >> >> house. My children are scattered and I was a good mother to 
> > > > >> >> >> them.
> > > > >> >> >> Maybe that is Love.
>
> > > > >> >> >> On May 4, 5:04 pm, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > Love is beauty and pain defined. But in order to experience 
> > > > >> >> >> > the pain
> > > > >> >> >> > you must see its beauty. Which often happens unexpectedly. I 
> > > > >> >> >> > wish I
> > > > >> >> >> > wasn't one of those people that think with their heart. What 
> > > > >> >> >> > is the
> > > > >> >> >> > value of brilliance when the actions of your heart blind you 
> > > > >> >> >> > from
> > > > >> >> >> > using it? When I think of love, it's a deep, deep, longing 
> > > > >> >> >> > for
> > > > >> >> >> > passion. Perhaps a flight without a plane. Or a swim without 
> > > > >> >> >> > water.
> > > > >> >> >> > Maybe even a delicacy tasted without swallowing. It's there 
> > > > >> >> >> > but your
> > > > >> >> >> > wary from it, worried about losing it, careful but not 
> > > > >> >> >> > capable of
> > > > >> >> >> > determining whether you keep it or not, as love does change. 
> > > > >> >> >> > It gives
> > > > >> >> >> > one the ability to things they would never expect.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > For example: I was able to play a tune on the piano, yet I 
> > > > >> >> >> > don't play
> > > > >> >> >> > the piano. No, not expertly, I would post a link to it but 
> > > > >> >> >> > would be
> > > > >> >> >> > worried about getting critiqued by experts. I am no expert 
> > > > >> >> >> > and don't
> > > > >> >> >> > play the piano, never have, we bought a keyboard about two 
> > > > >> >> >> > months ago,
> > > > >> >> >> > yet I managed a whole heart felt tune, I closed my eyes and 
> > > > >> >> >> > let my
> > > > >> >> >> > fingers work their own magic. Do you think love gives one
> > > > >> >> >> > abilities?
>
> > > > >> >> >> > On May 4, 5:46 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > I am one of you- though disappointed and resigned. I look 
> > > > >> >> >> > > back over my
> > > > >> >> >> > > life as a grief of love. Take my heart but spare me my 
> > > > >> >> >> > > money. The last
> > > > >> >> >> > > time I heard "jaded" was from my highschool sweetheart who 
> > > > >> >> >> > > I dated for
> > > > >> >> >> > > a year after he divorced from a 30 year marriage. He was 
> > > > >> >> >> > > still a jerk
> > > > >> >> >> > > and died soon after I left him. Stuff happens.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > On May 4, 3:54 pm, Chris Jenkins 
> > > > >> >> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > Hmmm...I don't know, from what I hear, age is no barrier 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > to love nor lust. ;)
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > Glad to have you aboard. Strong opening salvo, though! 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > No soft spot at
> > > > >> >> >> > > > all for us romantics?
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM, rigsy03 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > Thank you for Monday's laugh! One is allowed. Two 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > would be lethal.// I
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > wasn't sure this thought would get through but I would 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > like to read
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > along in this group. I am a grandmother so somewhat 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > protected from
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > foolish fancy even in the lusty month of May. I lust 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > after William
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > Safire. :-) Anyway, thanks for the welcome.//
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > On May 4, 10:35 am, Chris Jenkins 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Ah, the voice of the jaded.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Welcome, Rigsy. Care to tell us a story?
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> [ Attached Message ]From:rigsy03 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> 06:16:08 -0700 (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 8:16 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the nature of Love?
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Love is a myth and marketing tool.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> On May 4, 8:10 am, Chris Jenkins 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > Not always, but definitely at least sometimes. 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > There is much healing in a loving touch.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > [ Attached Message ]From:Rosey 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > 05:53:04 -0700 (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 7:53 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the nature of 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > Love?
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > Is affection healing? Can a person kiss and hug the 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > pain away? I
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > believe this tactic works. But for some it does not.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > On May 4, 8:41 am, Molly Brogan 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > I think I understand and I do appreciate your 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > words here Vam. We all,
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > each of us, deserve to be surrounded by those 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > that love us
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > unconditionally, and allow us to be who we are as 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > we evolve and
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > awaken. The key for me has been to provide this 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > to those around me. I
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > have found that in doing so, I am surrounded by 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > folks who can love in
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > the same way. This does not mean that I allow 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > myself to be exploited
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > or abused, because I think that a part of 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > unconditional love is
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > bringing such behavior by the other to light, and 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > then moving away
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > from it, allowing the other to learn or not. 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > There are times when
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > compassion is enough and the relationship 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > becoming peripheral is in
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > perfect order. Your unconditional love then 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > includes honesty,
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > appreciation and psychological safety for all. 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > These can be provided
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > through deep intimacy or great distance. There is 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > a grace that leads
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > the way.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > On May 4, 12:49 am, Vamadevananda 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > " Affection, in all forms, is an extremely 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > valuable and important part
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > of the relationship to me ... "
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > And Grace, both while giving to and receiving 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > from ... But, valuable
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > and important as they are, these are still the 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > atmospherics. The
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > crucial part is the quality of ' being ' 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > individuals sense within
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > themselves, and the opportunity they have to ' 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > be ' themselves, to
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > grow and evolve and continue to transform the ' 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > I - Space ' within to
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > greater sense of strength, happiness, freedom 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > and self - discovery.
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > We are all striving for that rich and pregnant 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > ground of ' I - space '
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > in which our finitude dissolves. The others are 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > important to us, in
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > this context, for the atmospherics they cause 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > or contribute to. It can
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > aid or mar the ' awakening.'
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > We each love the other, for the love of our 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > Self !
>
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > ( I waited long before punching the ' Send ' 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > button, wondering if what
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > I'm posting makes any sense. Even, if it is 
> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> > > > appropriate ? )
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to