...and thus the discussion of the nature of Love. I'm sure Hinckley
would have something to contribute to the conversation.

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Love can be a powerful source for murder in the mind of a psycho.
>
> peace & Love
>
> On May 4, 7:02 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...and yet Love can be a powerful source for all these things.
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I would think the 'exploding in the arts' would be better classified
>> > as insight, inspiration or revelation rather than Love.
>>
>> > peace & Love
>>
>> > On May 4, 6:28 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Yes. It explodes in the arts. Have done the whole trip- painting,
>> >> music, needlearts, poetry, gardening, cooking, diplomas. It still
>> >> doesn't cure a lost heart. I am now a hermitess living in a grand
>> >> house. My children are scattered and I was a good mother to them.
>> >> Maybe that is Love.
>>
>> >> On May 4, 5:04 pm, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Love is beauty and pain defined. But in order to experience the pain
>> >> > you must see its beauty. Which often happens unexpectedly. I wish I
>> >> > wasn't one of those people that think with their heart. What is the
>> >> > value of brilliance when the actions of your heart blind you from
>> >> > using it? When I think of love, it's a deep, deep, longing for
>> >> > passion. Perhaps a flight without a plane. Or a swim without water.
>> >> > Maybe even a delicacy tasted without swallowing. It's there but your
>> >> > wary from it, worried about losing it, careful but not capable of
>> >> > determining whether you keep it or not, as love does change. It gives
>> >> > one the ability to things they would never expect.
>>
>> >> > For example: I was able to play a tune on the piano, yet I don't play
>> >> > the piano. No, not expertly, I would post a link to it but would be
>> >> > worried about getting critiqued by experts. I am no expert and don't
>> >> > play the piano, never have, we bought a keyboard about two months ago,
>> >> > yet I managed a whole heart felt tune, I closed my eyes and let my
>> >> > fingers work their own magic. Do you think love gives one
>> >> > abilities?
>>
>> >> > On May 4, 5:46 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > I am one of you- though disappointed and resigned. I look back over my
>> >> > > life as a grief of love. Take my heart but spare me my money. The last
>> >> > > time I heard "jaded" was from my highschool sweetheart who I dated for
>> >> > > a year after he divorced from a 30 year marriage. He was still a jerk
>> >> > > and died soon after I left him. Stuff happens.
>>
>> >> > > On May 4, 3:54 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > Hmmm...I don't know, from what I hear, age is no barrier to love 
>> >> > > > nor lust. ;)
>>
>> >> > > > Glad to have you aboard. Strong opening salvo, though! No soft spot 
>> >> > > > at
>> >> > > > all for us romantics?
>>
>> >> > > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > Thank you for Monday's laugh! One is allowed. Two would be 
>> >> > > > > lethal.// I
>> >> > > > > wasn't sure this thought would get through but I would like to 
>> >> > > > > read
>> >> > > > > along in this group. I am a grandmother so somewhat protected from
>> >> > > > > foolish fancy even in the lusty month of May. I lust after William
>> >> > > > > Safire. :-) Anyway, thanks for the welcome.//
>>
>> >> > > > > On May 4, 10:35 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> 
>> >> > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >> Ah, the voice of the jaded.
>>
>> >> > > > >> Welcome, Rigsy. Care to tell us a story?
>>
>> >> > > > >> [ Attached Message ]From:rigsy03 <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds 
>> >> > > > >> Eye\"" <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 06:16:08 
>> >> > > > >> -0700 (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 8:16 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: 
>> >> > > > >> What is the nature of Love?
>>
>> >> > > > >> Love is a myth and marketing tool.
>>
>> >> > > > >> On May 4, 8:10 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> 
>> >> > > > >> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > >> > Not always, but definitely at least sometimes. There is much 
>> >> > > > >> > healing in a loving touch.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > [ Attached Message ]From:Rosey 
>> >> > > > >> > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
>> >> > > > >> > <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 05:53:04 
>> >> > > > >> > -0700 (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 7:53 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] 
>> >> > > > >> > Re: What is the nature of Love?
>>
>> >> > > > >> > Is affection healing? Can a person kiss and hug the pain away? 
>> >> > > > >> > I
>> >> > > > >> > believe this tactic works. But for some it does not.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > On May 4, 8:41 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > I think I understand and I do appreciate your words here 
>> >> > > > >> > > Vam. We all,
>> >> > > > >> > > each of us, deserve to be surrounded by those that love us
>> >> > > > >> > > unconditionally, and allow us to be who we are as we evolve 
>> >> > > > >> > > and
>> >> > > > >> > > awaken. The key for me has been to provide this to those 
>> >> > > > >> > > around me. I
>> >> > > > >> > > have found that in doing so, I am surrounded by folks who 
>> >> > > > >> > > can love in
>> >> > > > >> > > the same way. This does not mean that I allow myself to be 
>> >> > > > >> > > exploited
>> >> > > > >> > > or abused, because I think that a part of unconditional love 
>> >> > > > >> > > is
>> >> > > > >> > > bringing such behavior by the other to light, and then 
>> >> > > > >> > > moving away
>> >> > > > >> > > from it, allowing the other to learn or not. There are times 
>> >> > > > >> > > when
>> >> > > > >> > > compassion is enough and the relationship becoming 
>> >> > > > >> > > peripheral is in
>> >> > > > >> > > perfect order. Your unconditional love then includes honesty,
>> >> > > > >> > > appreciation and psychological safety for all. These can be 
>> >> > > > >> > > provided
>> >> > > > >> > > through deep intimacy or great distance. There is a grace 
>> >> > > > >> > > that leads
>> >> > > > >> > > the way.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > On May 4, 12:49 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> 
>> >> > > > >> > > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > " Affection, in all forms, is an extremely valuable and 
>> >> > > > >> > > > important part
>> >> > > > >> > > > of the relationship to me ... "
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > And Grace, both while giving to and receiving from ... 
>> >> > > > >> > > > But, valuable
>> >> > > > >> > > > and important as they are, these are still the 
>> >> > > > >> > > > atmospherics. The
>> >> > > > >> > > > crucial part is the quality of ' being ' individuals sense 
>> >> > > > >> > > > within
>> >> > > > >> > > > themselves, and the opportunity they have to ' be ' 
>> >> > > > >> > > > themselves, to
>> >> > > > >> > > > grow and evolve and continue to transform the ' I - Space 
>> >> > > > >> > > > ' within to
>> >> > > > >> > > > greater sense of strength, happiness, freedom and self - 
>> >> > > > >> > > > discovery.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > We are all striving for that rich and pregnant ground of ' 
>> >> > > > >> > > > I - space '
>> >> > > > >> > > > in which our finitude dissolves. The others are important 
>> >> > > > >> > > > to us, in
>> >> > > > >> > > > this context, for the atmospherics they cause or 
>> >> > > > >> > > > contribute to. It can
>> >> > > > >> > > > aid or mar the ' awakening.'
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > We each love the other, for the love of our Self !
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > ( I waited long before punching the ' Send ' button, 
>> >> > > > >> > > > wondering if what
>> >> > > > >> > > > I'm posting makes any sense. Even, if it is appropriate ? )
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > On May 4, 7:57 am, Chris Jenkins 
>> >> > > > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > I think (a very necessary disclaimer in topics such as 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > these) that the secret may be to only require commitment 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > from your partner, to continue to freely be who you are, 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > and expect the same from them, and to strive for the 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > happy balance of compromise and acceptance in the places 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > where friction inevitably occurs. Sometimes we align 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > ourselves with partners who have drastically different 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > life goals, and that's simply not possible. Other times 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > our partners, or we ourselves, are in a self destructive 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > place which is simply not conducive to a healthy 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > relationship. If, however, we are both aligned 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > similarly, and both committed to that goal, then a zen 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > state of love, where it is not questioned, but simply 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > is, seems to me to be the path to a long term bliss.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > If everyday, despite the day I've had, I make the effort 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > to express some portion of Eros energy to my partner, 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > even if in no other form than text message, I've "been", 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > in the zen sense, affirmed the love, made it be by being 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > it. When that is affirmed in reply, that circle is 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > completed. The actual physical expenditure of the ritual 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > is miniscule, yet the effect is powerful.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > Affection, in all forms, is an extremely valuable and 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > important part of the relationship to me, which Is just 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > one of the many ides of Love I inherit from my Father. 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > He's still married to my Mom, and from all appearances, 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > still in love with her in an Eros kind of way. :-D It's 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > a strong archetype to have in your head of what a long 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > term love can be. I can't imagine the idea of my Father 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > being unfaithful to my Mom. It's inconceivable to me.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > It strikes me Neil that one of the problems with Love is 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > that most of the wisdom about it doesn't come until our 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > later years, and many of us either don't have a proper 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > Sage around, or are a bit too damn fool hardy in our 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > youths to listen if we do.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:archytas 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > <[email protected]>Date:Sun, 3 May 2009 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > 18:30:21 -0700 (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 6:30 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the nature of Love?
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > There is some thinking that love is over-stated and 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > leads to over-
>> >> > > > >> > > > > expectation, perhaps rather strangely making loving 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > relationship more
>> >> > > > >> > > > > difficult than it needs to be. Raising any of us 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > fallible humans to a
>> >> > > > >> > > > > golden pedestal is to put whoever it is before a fall. 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > One can
>> >> > > > >> > > > > certainly be loving and it appears this can be 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > reciprocal, though I'd
>> >> > > > >> > > > > expect this to be less than perfect or bound in mutual 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > illusions.
>> >> > > > >> > > > > Freedom from exploitation seems key to me, along with 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > some form of
>> >> > > > >> > > > > understanding on equality. I can say that I wish I had 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > been better
>> >> > > > >> > > > > able to enjoy sex earlier in my life through some decent 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > education
>> >> > > > >> > > > > about it.
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > On 4 May, 01:07, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > >> > > > > > Exactly, trust is essential to the bond, it is the 
>> >> > > > >> > > > > > adhesive quality
>> >> > > > >> > > > > > that transforms two into one. The
>>
>> ...
>>
>> read more »
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to