On 3 Dec, 22:10, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> One more point regarding the "Moral High Ground":
>
> Mohammed married Aisha when she was six years old, and consummated that
> marriage when she was nine years old.
>

She was betrothed at about age six, but was 'married' at about age
ten.  The consummation wasn't for another 2 to 4 years--certainly
after menarche. She came to his chamber and asked for him to come to
hers.  Therefore, SHE instigated the consummation.  He would not have
had it any other way.  So, if your wife asks for sex, are you to
refuse her?  If she wants it, she'll find it; and if you don't give it
to her, you force her to commit adultery.

> Now, tell me again about the moral high ground part, while I meditate on the
> example of pedophilia Mohammed set.
>

Your example is out of context, not fully educated ON the subject and
is rife with Islamophobic predispositions.  As you don't tell the
WHOLE story (you can't, as it wouldn't back up the conclusions you
prefer), you're quite content with your ignorance.  Marrying young was
rather traditional in those days.  In fact, in the pagan-Arabs, it was
often the case that children would be betrothed before they were
born.  Aisha had every opportunity to not agree to the marriage (i.e.,
the marriage was not a forced marriage), as the Prophet requires that
women have the right to refuse to marry if they feel they would be
unhappy and he ended the practice of betrothal before birth among the
Arabs.  Aisha was the daughter of Abu Bakr, Muhammed's closest friend,
and had known Muhammed all her life and loved him because he was a
kind and caring man who had always treated her with great care and
respect.  For several years, they didn't even live under the same
roof, with Aisha in Mecca and Muhammed in Medina (Yathrib).  Once she
had moved to Medina, she had her own quarters which Muhammed would not
enter without her request.  So, this 'pedophilia' you mention is just
ignorant Islamophobia and, in human terms, about as uncommon as 14-
year old girls falling pregnant in today's world.  With the exception
that the modern girl probably isn't married and, therefore, has no
legal way of protecting the provision for such children.  Meditate on
THAT, if you're fair.

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 2 Dec, 16:57, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Muslims will be conquered by the Chinese, perhaps. The only other
> > > solution is to level their countries like we did Germany and Japan-
> > > who, at least, were industrialized. The only thing Islam has going for
> > > it are oil deposits in various countries. But we have water.
>
> > "The only thing Islam has going for it are oil deposits in various
> > countries."
>
> >      I take it, from that, that you have never read the Qur'an.  The
> > main gist of it (Islam/the Qur'an) is that mankind should not oppress
> > one another and that we should care for the orphans and elderly and
> > the poor and treat all individuals with respect.  Much of the
> > remainder is outlining examples of previous peoples who did NOT act
> > that way and reminding the reader of how those peoples were
> > destroyed.  Also, there's a fair amount of instructions on how to
> > maintain women's rights to inheritance and their right to be heard--
> > things that, in the West, women didn't get until the latter part of
> > the 19th Century/early 20th century.  I.e., the Qur'an was, with
> > respect to women's rights, some 1300 years ahead of its time.
> >   The problems come in when Western society demands its right to be
> > intoxicated and irascible to the point of outright destructive
> > behaviour afterwards and the duty to oppress one another through usury
> > and other ways (in the name of 'Survival of the Fittest', a euphemism
> > for maintaining that animal instincts are the way forward!!) and
> > Muslims don't understand why Western, supposedly civilised people,
> > demand the right to act like idiots, screw up the environment and take
> > as much as is possible from those who have the least.  Muslims don't
> > view that as civilised behaviour.
> >     With respect to the oil, it won't always be there, as the West is
> > using it up and fouling the Earth with its waste products.  After the
> > oil is gone, what Islam will be left with is what they have had for
> > 1400+ years...the moral high ground.
>
> > > On Dec 2, 10:45 am, fran the man <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > In a referendum last Sunday, 57.5% of the Swiss voted to ban minarets.
>
> > > > As right-wing populists cheered and liberal multi-culturalists were
> > > > shocked, the Swiss decision reflects a deep problem for western
> > > > democracies, particularly in Europe. How do you integrate a religious
> > > > culture into a pluralist society, which has mutual tolerance as one of
> > > > its basic principles, when significant groups in that culture reject
> > > > many principles of that society which is trying to integrate them? Is
> > > > this a signal that the meeting between western societies and Islam
> > > > leads to irreconcilable differences? Or is the Swiss vote basically,
> > > > or partly, an expression of deep-seated racism and subjective views of
> > > > cultural superiority?
>
> > > > Some background:
>
> > > >http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,664231,00.html
>
> > > > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to