How can Unity be 'controlled by spin and promotion'?

On Apr 17, 11:53 pm, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> ahh Sherif   we do not get much time to talk  ,, other topic are more
> pressing  but he never fails to bring me cookies (traditional fancy type  hm
> m good, lip smacking type)
>
> I think every generation has an understand of unity,  unfortunately today it
> is controlled by spin and promotion.
> Allan
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:49 AM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Allan, again we agree on the apparent lack of practicality when it
> > comes to ancient Egyptian religious practices and their use today.
> > I've heard it said that they clearly knew 'the Unity' and by most
> > standards, this appears to have been the case.
>
> > So, of what 'use' is their theology today...very little that I can see
> > too.
>
> > Their use of math and trig and a possible observatory was a new and
> > unique presentation for me and one that I greatly appreciated. Is this
> > actually what the Great Pyramid was used for?...no, I don't know for
> > sure either. It just looks like a very good possibility... based on
> > the physical evidence.
>
> > Perhaps you would share some stories about Sherif here some day? It
> > might be of interest to many...
>
> > On Apr 17, 9:42 am, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Well Orn
> > > The greatest answer I have ever heard is 'I don't know.'
> > > I looked into the Egyptian 'spirituality?' many years ago and found it
> > for
> > > me to be of very little value.
>
> > > I know Egypt has been photographed every which way but loose so finding
> > them
> > >  really does not surprise me. american universities are well known for
> > their
> > > research ..   and there are always possibilities. The acid test for me
> > comes
> > > down to of what real value does it have for me today? Sadly for me these
> > > wild and fantasy ideas that are being promoted lack real substance. but
> > to
> > > each his own.
>
> > > as for your amazon reference..  I am looking at the few books I keep in
> > my
> > > desk I see one that I have had for years ,, actually I have two copies of
> > > it,, memory tells me I paid $4.95 for each copy which normally sold for
> > > $12.95  recently a  person asked me about it,, and the amazon price used
> > is
> > > $150.oo .  Today  it is even on line and now has a whole cult following..
> > >  When it comes to books prices all I can say is a fool and his money is
> > soon
> > > parted and looking it ,, now it has been photocopied on line.
>
> > > if I really want to get down into the Egyptian thing I Ii will sit down
> > and
> > > discuss it with my friend Sherif over coffee.
>
> > > There are people whose knowledge and wisdom really dazzle me..  mean
> > while
> > >  'I don't know.'
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 2:24 PM, ornamentalmind
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > Oh, I take almost *all* writings ‘with a grain of salt’ Allan. I give
> > > > a critical eye to those who present their opinions about others who
> > > > have actually done some research too!
>
> > > > However, in the particular, the majority of the first part of Peter’s
> > > > book is but a compilation of the available written history about the
> > > > Pyramid. The middle part about its probable use as an observatory is
> > > > only one of the countless possibilities presented about its possible
> > > > function. I read this part with a skeptical eye. And, even with this
> > > > skepticism found that the physical structure actually supports this
> > > > particular theory and is used as the main source for this possible
> > > > use. Here I’m talking about exact measurements including comparisons
> > > > of measurements previously made at different points of time during its
> > > > continual decline.
>
> > > > The other sections about its construction, how the passages were
> > > > plugged etc. too are presented using only its own physical shape and
> > > > measurements as primary evidence. Admittedly, this is the part where
> > > > projected understandings can be involved as is the case with most
> > > > things. Yet, assuming the very carefully documented measurements are
> > > > all accurate (I haven’t personally measured them.), what he presents
> > > > is very persuasive. Very!
>
> > > > The one chapter about ‘Secret Initiation’ is mostly speculation and is
> > > > presented as such. This is the part I said that I personally wish were
> > > > the case but need not be at all.
>
> > > > A list of the contents was found in my previous post.
>
> > > > Without going into depth, there are many scholarly papers about the
> > > > ancient Egyptians and astronomy too. See:
> > > >http://roger.homelinux.org/temp/40000577.pdf
> > > > for but one.
>
> > > > As an aside, about 35 years ago or so while browsing in a University
> > > > library in Mississippi, I ran across a handful of oversized books that
> > > > were almost entirely photographs. One of these books included photos
> > > > of most parts of the Temple at Karnack (biggest temple in Egypt, built
> > > > over 1,300 years and whose area is said to be the largest ancient
> > > > religious site in the world).
>
> > > > Besides the fascinating drawings found there like the vault with the
> > > > Sky Goddess, Nut depicted over its entire ceiling, there was one room
> > > > with an entry at both ends and it had what can only be called a moat
> > > > around all four sides with a central area … all carved out of stone.
> > > > I’ve never seen a room like this and can only project its possible
> > > > use. However, I will note that it doesn’t come up readily when one
> > > > Googles Luxor.
>
> > > > Again, I’m not attempting to be evangelical here. I only suggest that
> > > > prior to rejecting some of the well documented scientific findings
> > > > about such ancient things out of hand based upon a few people’s
> > > > written opinions of those who present them…like Tompkins, to look a
> > > > little further personally.
>
> > > > One simple current day ‘test’ of such things often can be found at
> > > > Amazon.
>
> >http://www.amazon.com/Secrets-Great-Pyramid-Peter-Tompkins/dp/0883659573
>
> > > > Here critics from all walks of life review other people’s words. The
> > > > average, nay, even the vast majority of the reviews in this particular
> > > > case differ from what you have apparently read Allan.
>
> > > > Anecdotally, an acquaintance of mine who is a trained, degreed
> > > > archaeologist and has visited the areas in question holds similar
> > > > views. Even though we both have studied hieroglyphics (and both reject
> > > > Budge’s interpretations equally), we remain open minded…just have
> > > > reached certain conclusions based upon what evidence we have found so
> > > > far.
>
> > > > So, in conclusion, "fact"?... "fiction"?... "fantasy"? Yes, all are
> > > > possible. I appreciate all three and do my best at differentiating
> > > > between them. 'Fame'?, 'Fortune'?... yes, both can be motivators for
> > > > being 'creative' in a deceptive way. Yet, I don't automatically assign
> > > > such untruthful attributes to all authors.... most of whom clearly
> > > > must possess a tad of the drive for both ... fame & fortune.
>
> > > > On Apr 17, 1:28 am, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I think there are groups of people who read into things (in the
> > broadest
> > > > > sense) to fit their theories. Over the years people have given
> > > > > it mystical powers far beyond reality,, mixing fact with fiction and
> > > > > fantasy.
>
> > > > > the truth be known the writings of Peter Tompkins need to be taken
> > with a
> > > > > grain of salt ,, They may be interesting reading,,  from what I read
> > of
> > > > his
> > > > > writings  they were done for fame and fortune.
> > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:04 PM, ornamentalmind
> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > In an attempt at returning to the original topic:
>
> > > > > > “what does evryone think about the great pyramid , what was its
> > > > > > purpose , why no hylogriphics,  EVRY tumb other than the great
> > > > > > pyramid
> > > > > > has hylogriphics “ - TTS
>
> > > > > > There are numerous beliefs and theories about the Pyramid of
> > Cheops.
> > > > > > Personally, I didn’t feel that grounded in any of them until I read
> > > > > > Peter Tompkins’ book, “Secrets of the Great Pyramid”. One can find
> > > > > > much about this book online. Just as an overview, here is a list of
> > > > > > its contents:
> > > > > >http://greatpyramid.org/aip/tompkins.htm
>
> > > > > > While one can argue that *any* belief about it is but a personal
> > > > > > projection of some sort, the physical correspondences found with
> > the
> > > > > > pyramid associated with the mathematics presented as being what was
> > > > > > being codified in stone (also presented in an earlier link I
> > provided
> > > > > > in this topic), seem to be the very best explanation grounded in
> > > > > > *rational* thinking I’ve found.
>
> > > > > > Now, on a personal note, I’ve heard different mystical stories
> > about
> > > > > > how it was used for self advancement that I would like to believe
> > are
> > > > > > true; however, the evidence just isn’t there and the associated
> > ideas
> > > > > > do not need the existence of that specific physical structure to be
> > of
> > > > > > note either.
>
> > > > > > Over the decades that I’ve studied this particular structure, the
> > > > > > ideas about who and how it was built have evolved from the long
> > > > > > standing use of ‘slaves’ and a lack of clarity as to how it could
> > have
> > > > > > been built to a fairly clear and backed by engineers and historians
> > > > > > view of an entire culture supporting the vision and working on
> > it…not
> > > > > > as slaves but as willing and actually deeply involved participants.
> > > > > > Again, the archeological evidence points to well kept people living
> > in
> > > > > > a fairly comfortable setting under the given conditions as well as
> > > > > > being fed well and consideration given to family ties too…all
> > striving
> > > > > > to produce/manifest this one great vision.
>
> > > > > > Yes, there
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Reply via email to