Yes, Allan, I remember you mentioned that before. The feeling of shock must
have been a reaction to your American upbringing. The tabula rasa myth was
an imported myth or so, no?

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:

> Gabby you should look into those who signed the American declaration of
> independence as for the Bill of Right is was copied almost verbatim of the
> Dutch ill of rights written a hundred years earlier..  You can imagine my
> shock when I found that out..
> Allan
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chris Jenkins 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Gabby, I hope you approve. I tried my best to follow rule #10:
>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150334273466494.348470.722681493&l=b50118df79&type=1
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Chris Jenkins <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, we all brought garbage bags, and cleaned up after ourselves. As
>>> for finding a job, I've been on the market for over 18 months, with a solid,
>>> industry professional resume, and have found nothing. Meanwhile, many of my
>>> former colleagues have joined my ranks.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:19 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The biased media and comics have been trashing conservatives and
>>>> ridiculing the Tea Party and various candidiates so you have to expect
>>>> some payback.
>>>>
>>>> How do these protestors expect to find a job or stay in school if they
>>>> spend all their time protesting? Who will pay for the clean-up? What
>>>> business would risk hiring these people?
>>>>
>>>> Most loot is not easily transported. :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 6, 9:40 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > I scanned it and agree, a bit bullshitty but one must admire the
>>>> hopeful
>>>> > tone the writer emits. So the Occupiers are all about coming together
>>>> if not
>>>> > completely cogent on their reasons for doing so. Where the Tea Party,
>>>> to me,
>>>> > has mostly been about tax and spending cuts Tthe Occupiers seem, again
>>>> to
>>>> > me(it's a shame it's still so unclear) to be all about political
>>>> corporate
>>>> > favoritism. I would hesitate to label the 99%ers as Class Warriors
>>>> although
>>>> > many of their organizers seem to have this at the top of their agenda.
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm disappointed in the rhetoric from Conservative mouthpieces like
>>>> Limbaugh
>>>> > that are trashing the movement. Ridiculing the protestors and so
>>>> forth. It
>>>> > would make more sense to recognize that there are those that are
>>>> having some
>>>> > tough times and try to help educate those disaffected folks on the
>>>> real
>>>> > problems which isn't rich people per se. It's bad government. By both
>>>> > Republicans and Democrats. In a nutshell, too much wasteful spending
>>>> and not
>>>> > enough pin-pointed economic stimulus spending.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for the link to the Boston Group Arch I'll probably read it
>>>> again
>>>> > soon. These economist make sense but the real problem is going to be
>>>> coming
>>>> > up with something everyone can swallow. We sure don't need our very
>>>> own
>>>> > Reign Of Terror. Nobody wants to give in here. If I was rich I'd be
>>>> tired of
>>>> > being called the bad guy all the time unless I really was the bad guy
>>>> in
>>>> > which case I wouldn't care a fig. I'd take my loot and go somewhere
>>>> else.
>>>> > God help us all.
>>>> >
>>>> > dj
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > There's a take on Occupy Wall Street at
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/10/matt-stoller-the-anti-politics.
>>>> ..
>>>> > > - that sounds like Allan - a bit bullshitty (sorry Al - not you)
>>>> Chris
>>>> > > but an interesting take.
>>>> >
>>>> > > I can't stand any standard politics now.  It's madness.
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Oct 6, 8:36 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > I think there is where the problem lies,,  several decades ago the
>>>> > > > revolution was bassed off ideology differences (the Little Red
>>>> Book)
>>>> > >  this
>>>> > > > really was not a valid reason..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > today I see
>>>> > >
>>>> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/10/matt-stoller-the-anti-politics...differentworld,,
>>>>  especially in the US  also to a
>>>> > > > lesser extent Europe..  in the US there are other problems there
>>>> are
>>>> > > > existing undergrounds outside of police intelligence,,  there are
>>>> massive
>>>> > > > amounts of weapons out of site and out of mind and other than the
>>>> owner
>>>> > > no
>>>> > > > one knows about them..  Even I still have guns and I no longer
>>>> live
>>>> > > there..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > The US is extremely Large,, there is also a large community of
>>>> motor
>>>> > > homes
>>>> > > >  which have the ability move and potentially lower the cost of
>>>> living..
>>>> > > > and organize.. the police are not unsympathetic either as they
>>>> often
>>>> > > times
>>>> > > > in the same or similar situation..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > I do believe co-op-s will become more plentiful, underground work
>>>> will
>>>> > > > become more prevalent..  it will change,,  I think the start is in
>>>> > > > eliminating the political corruption that is so embedded..
>>>> > > > sigh
>>>> > > > Allan
>>>> >
>>>> > > > I hate change ..  but greed is so wide spread.. a tremendous lose
>>>> > > > of spirituality  ,,  but fundamentalism  may have some perks in
>>>> the end,,
>>>> >
>>>> > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Chris Jenkins <
>>>> > > [email protected]>wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > I see BoA as an infinitely powerful entity, and can't imagine
>>>> the
>>>> > > behemoth
>>>> > > > > falling.
>>>> > > > > On Oct 5, 2011 10:18 PM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > Pruning ain't the metaphor I'd choose Chris. Dexia Bank has
>>>> just gone
>>>> > > > > > belly-up - it was 'worth' more than Belgium's GDP. The 'money'
>>>> in the
>>>> > > > > > banking scam is at factors of ten in comparison with the world
>>>> of
>>>> > > real
>>>> > > > > > work. My view is that it's in the way of capitalism and
>>>> democracy.
>>>> > > > > > The informed guess is they've been lending to crooks on a
>>>> scale
>>>> > > vastly
>>>> > > > > > bigger than the barrel-loads of dollars gone in Iraq and
>>>> Afghanistan
>>>> > > > > > without securing any 'mineral rights'. The kleft stick is that
>>>> they
>>>> > > > > > can only make money through the same old scams, so whatever we
>>>> put
>>>> > > > > > back in (and I mean we) just does it all over again. In an
>>>> > > > > > oversimplified way, much of the debt is like you owing me $2
>>>> million,
>>>> > > > > > Don owing 'Francois' $5 million, me owing Molly (etc.) in an
>>>> equation
>>>> > > > > > in which, if we cancelled out we're all solvent and I owe Orn
>>>> a beer
>>>> > > > > > he won'r drink. What goes in the cancelling is the banks - the
>>>> debts
>>>> > > > > > are so networked it's almost like the $2 million you owe me is
>>>> > > > > > balanced by $1.99 million I owe to people who owe you. I've
>>>> been
>>>> > > > > > teaching the EU figures if anyone is interested (they just
>>>> tell this
>>>> > > > > > story between EU countries).
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > We've finally seen some reporting here. A Wall Street guy came
>>>> on and
>>>> > > > > > said he was amazed more people weren't protesting as he
>>>> thought true
>>>> > > > > > unemployment was at 15% - which is what I reckon here. The
>>>> real issue
>>>> > > > > > to me is jobs and wages. A key figure for me is that the
>>>> bottom 50%
>>>> > > > > > back in 1980 had 14% of liquid assets (cash more or less) and
>>>> that's
>>>> > > > > > down to 1% now. Wages have fallen. The debt problem starts
>>>> around
>>>> > > > > > 1965 and it's similar in form to similar ones around gold
>>>> rushes in
>>>> > > > > > history. Most people I've seen on television or met in
>>>> Manchester
>>>> > > > > > don't know much of the economics but are sick of the lack of
>>>> > > > > > opportunity.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > I was left a house when my cousin died and had to drop the
>>>> price by a
>>>> > > > > > fifth to sell. There's no decent unskilled or engineering work
>>>> around
>>>> > > > > > here and jobs are being lost at some rate. Just up the road we
>>>> have
>>>> > > > > > 64 years of UK energy supply as shale gas about to be
>>>> exploited. I
>>>> > > > > > worked on the survey 25 years back. You'd think we'd have a
>>>> plan
>>>> > > > > > around this but there isn't one.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > Political blather is just about getting the economy moving,
>>>> our
>>>> > > people
>>>> > > > > > working. It's all dross. Interestingly, our Republicans
>>>> couldn't
>>>> > > > > > even fill the seats for the Prime Minister's speech. He's not
>>>> a half-
>>>> > > > > > wit like Palin but he's claiming his government has dealt with
>>>> the
>>>> > > > > > banks - yet two of the one's we bailed out are still making
>>>> the kinds
>>>> > > > > > of losses they were before 2008. One of them,HBOS, was running
>>>> a
>>>> > > > > > criminal scam that closed many small companies and is not
>>>> cooperating
>>>> > > > > > with the limited police enquiries.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > I don't think most people know how bad it all is yet. The
>>>> collapse of
>>>> > > > > > Soc. Gen. and Bank of America should do it - B o A could even
>>>> end up
>>>> > > > > > Chinese. There are underlying questions on how we get fed if
>>>> it all
>>>> > > > > > collapses - after all, we're still growing the food.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > On Oct 5, 9:43 pm, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >> Great time to live,, revolution is always exciting.  Maybe if
>>>> the
>>>> > > > > bankers
>>>> > > > > >> and stock market wake up.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> Do corporations still agree obey the laws of the state and
>>>> the
>>>> > > United
>>>> > > > > >> state..  and if they don't do they lose their corporate skirt
>>>> > > > > >> Allan
>>>> > > > > >>  On Oct 5, 2011 7:37 PM, "Chris Jenkins" <
>>>> > > [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> > Citizens United was one of the worst rulings in the entire
>>>> history
>>>> > > of
>>>> > > > > the
>>>> > > > > >> > Supreme Court.
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Comm.
>>>> > > > > ..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> > Restricting unions while empowering corporations in
>>>> political
>>>> > > speech
>>>> > > > > is one
>>>> > > > > >> > of the root problems that Occupy hopes to address.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, ornamentalmind <
>>>> > > > > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > >> > > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> It looks like the unions are entering into the fray. No
>>>> doubt
>>>> > > this
>>>> > > > > >> >> will accelerate the attacks on them… such as the proposals
>>>> to
>>>> > > greatly
>>>> > > > > >> >> limit and/or not allow political contributions. Perhaps if
>>>> they
>>>> > > > > >> >> incorporated….
>>>> >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/5/as_unions_students_join_occupy_.
>>>> > > ..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> On Oct 5, 8:02 am, Chris Jenkins <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >> >> > And thus the need for education. CDO Swaps and other
>>>> bits of
>>>> > > > > banking
>>>> > > > > >> >> > nastiness that prune money from the system while
>>>> contributing
>>>> > > > > nothing to
>>>> > > > > >> >> it
>>>> > > > > >> >> > are part of the problem.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:35 PM, archytas <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > We have Occupy here too - a few tent cities so far -
>>>> people
>>>> > > also
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > making the point they ain't left-wing loonies.  I went
>>>> to the
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > Manchester one yesterday to ask a few people 'why'?
>>>>  I'm not
>>>> > > sure
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > heard much that was accurate.  Might have a look at
>>>> Greece
>>>> > > nearer
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > Xmas.  Most peopleI met yesterday didn't know what
>>>> > > collateral-
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > derivative fractional banking was.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > On Oct 4, 2:40 pm, Chris Jenkins <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > Well then, reckon we should all grab shovels, yes?
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > On Oct 4, 2011 9:03 AM, "archytas" <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > I guess my picture of normal, Chris, would be of
>>>> an
>>>> > > ostrich
>>>> > > > > with
>>>> > > > > >> >> its
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > head in the sand - these being the people not
>>>> doing
>>>> > > > > occupation.
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > On Oct 4, 8:41 am, Allan H <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> It is good to see you again Chris and Don..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> I was thinking (I know a rare event) last night
>>>> only to
>>>> > > have
>>>> > > > > the
>>>> > > > > >> >> topic
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> return this morning..
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> After watching all the demonstrations some thing
>>>> emerged
>>>> > > > > that
>>>> > > > > >> >> does not
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > make
>>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> sense to me nor do I understand. maybe some one
>>>> can
>>>> > > > > straighten me
>>>> >
>>>> > ...
>>>> >
>>>> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
>>>> >
>>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
>
>

Reply via email to