Here's a question I believe Ron came up with as
follows:
The MoQ states Quality is before subjects and
objects, and Ron asked why couldn't subjects and
objects come before Quality.
So, I was trying to wrap my head around this, and
it was difficult for me to get a footing on
understanding this question. Then I came up with this
statement and question. I really don't have a way to
understand this statement or question at this time, if
anybody else wants to approach this, feel free.
If Quality doesn't come before subjects and
objects, then that would mean subjects and objects can
exist without any quality, right? Is this possible?
(To say subjects and objects can have no quality is to
give a quality measurement I would add, correct?)
thoughts?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car
Finder tool.
http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
