Hi Marsha and John, Krishnamurti felt that truth is a 'pathless land' and when asked who he (K) was, he said: 'nobody'. I think this is significant. SOM forces us to differentiate/ define/ enclose/ name etc, etc. The concept of 'I' has come about (IMHO) through our individual (meaning analogies upon analogies) relationship to DQ. This is the intellectualisation that occurs after the experience. There is no self, no ego IN experience. Only afterwards we think that we are so special in having this special relationship with this special ineffable concept. Bullshit! It is open to everyone and made use of by everyone...and when it come right down to it (Melanie) we share lots of the analogues as well.
All the sages of the world, when pressed, have denied their own 'I'. I found it interesting to see on this discuss,that when I introduced the 'I' as a non-existent concept, some started to have difficulty with this and, once again, using all sorts of SOM logic to justify the existence of 'themselves' . Curious isn't it? Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
