Andre,
I agree with you. No-body and no-thing, how did it ever seem otherwise...
Marsha
At 01:07 PM 6/5/2009, you wrote:
Hi Marsha and John,
Krishnamurti felt that truth is a 'pathless land' and when asked who he (K)
was, he said: 'nobody'. I think this is significant.
SOM forces us to differentiate/ define/ enclose/ name etc, etc. The concept
of 'I' has come about (IMHO) through our individual (meaning analogies upon
analogies) relationship to DQ. This is the intellectualisation that occurs
after the experience. There is no self, no ego IN experience. Only
afterwards we think that we are so special in having this special
relationship with this special ineffable concept.
Bullshit! It is open to everyone and made use of by everyone...and when it
come right down to it (Melanie) we share lots of the analogues as well.
All the sages of the world, when pressed, have denied their own 'I'.
I found it interesting to see on this discuss,that when I introduced the
'I' as a non-existent concept, some started to have difficulty with this
and, once again, using all sorts of SOM logic to justify the existence of
'themselves' . Curious isn't it?
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
_____________
The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and
interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual,
static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
