Drop them if they are proving to be of low-value, and it's not just about what you're over.
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:01 PM, gav wrote: > > should we drop 'truth', 'the market', 'freedom', 'america' as well then > > it's a fucking word > > meaning is contextual > > jesus i am so over this shit > > > --- On Tue, 9/3/10, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: MarshaV <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [MD] The Level of Intellectual Quality >> To: [email protected] >> Received: Tuesday, 9 March, 2010, 1:25 PM >> Greetings, >> >> Definition, connotation and history are intricately >> involved with patterning, and since the definition, >> connotation and history of the God-pattern is associated >> with "an evil social suppression of intellectual and >> Dynamic freedom" it should be dropped. Quality as >> presented in the Moq is a much better (untainted) >> label. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> On Mar 8, 2010, at 5:05 PM, gav wrote: >> >>> hiya, >>> >>> "In the third stage, that of 'absolute religion', the >> selfconscious subject and its object, Nature, are seen as >> distinct yet essentially related, and at the same time as >> grounded in an ultimate unity. And God is conceived 'as the >> Being who is at once the source, the sustaining power, and >> the end of our spiritual lives'. This does not mean, >> however, that the idea of God is completely indeterminate, >> so that we are forced to embrace the agnosticism of Herbert >> Spencer For God manifests Himself in both subject and >> object, and the more we understand the spiritual life of >> humanity on the one hand and the world of Nature on the >> other, so much the more do we learn about God who is 'the >> ultimate unity of our life and of the life of the >> world' <<<<<The MOQ would >> add a fourth stage where the term “God” is completely >> dropped as a relic of an evil social suppression of >> intellectual and Dynamic freedom. The MOQ >> is not just atheistic in this regard. It is >>> anti-theistic. >>>>>"" >>> >>> >>> gav: so the term 'god' is dropped but the concept >> remains? ie there is an ultimate unity of our life and the >> world but we don't call it god we call it quality or dynamic >> quality or tao or becoming or nagual or some other word? >>> >>> i am confused - seems like a cop out to me...what >> difference what we call it? maybe that's why the indians >> have hundreds of names for it.... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
