Jon said:
Pirsig favors dynamic quality, just as the I Ching with its two fundamental 
principles, favors yin, or the change principles.... Moq favors the dynamic 
reality over the static. And this sabotages its rational element even though it 
is often unseen.


dmb says:

Okay, now I'm beginning to think you haven't read Pirsig's books. In ZAMM, he 
says Taoism is an exact match and in Lila he says that static and dynamic 
quality are are both necessary. His emphasis on the dynamic is part of an 
effort to restore a proper balance because that's what's been missing from our 
age of scientific objectivity. That's the blind spot that keeps us out of 
whack, alienated, isolated and divided against ourselves. How does it put it? 
Without dynamic quality nothing can change and without static quality nothing 
can last. It's about having stability without having rigidity. It's about 
having creativity and novelty without having chaos or degeneration. 



Jon said:

...Furthermore, the Enlightenment was not as influential in America's formative 
years. So I'd like to see you present some evidence dmb, for your and Pirsig's 
claim (and Campbell would agree with you) that human rights, democracy, were 
grounded in Enlightenment thought.



dmb says:

There is a mountain of evidence. For starters, plug "Thomas Jefferson" and 
"John Locke" into a search engine and you'll see what I mean. Jefferson's most 
famous phrase from the Declaration of Independence, "life, liberty and the 
pursuit of happiness", is a modification of Locke's "life, liberty and 
property", for example. I think it would even be fair to say that the founding 
fathers lived at the height of the Enlightenment and their political philosophy 
epitomizes the Enlightenment. One can say many things about this period, but I 
think the outstanding feature is the differentiation of art, science and 
religion. (This results in things like the separation of church and state and 
the development of autonomy for each area or domain.) This is not something we 
want to undo, but the problem is that these domains are not just distinct and 
autonomous, they've become hostile to each other. So part of what Pirsig is 
doing with "DQ" is to reunite and reconnect them on a real basic lev
 el. We want beautiful science, intelligent art and a religion that isn't 
threatened by either.                                           
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to