We see here the carrying out of the ZAMM program into metaphysics.
Wholly in keeping with the opening epigraph of ZAMM. : )
On 11/25/2013 4:09 AM, MarshaV wrote:
"Phædrus remembered Hegel had been regarded as a bridge between Western and Oriental
philosophy. The Vedanta of the Hindus, the Way of the Taoists, even the Buddha had been
described as an absolute monism similar to Hegel's philosophy. Phædrus doubted at the
time, however, whether mystical Ones and metaphysical monisms were introconvertable since
mystical Ones follow no rules and metaphysical monisms do. His Quality was a metaphysical
entity, not a mystic one. Or was it? What was the difference? He answered himself that
the difference was one of definition. Metaphysical entities are defined. Mystical Ones
are not. That made Quality mystical. No. It was really both. Although he'd thought of it
purely in philosophical terms up to now as metaphysical, he had all along refused to
define it. That made it mystic too. Its indefinability freed it from the rules of
metaphysics."
On Nov 24, 2013, at 10:19 AM, "Michael R. Brown" <[email protected]> wrote:
The Buddha who can be missed isn't the Buddha.
The misser who misses the Buddha, though, probably is the misser.
There's the rub!
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
