> [SA previously]
> Ron, earlier during this thread I mentioned to you
> that endurance as
> an indicator of static quality, and endurance also
> as a measure of how
> much a static pattern is dynamicly receptive and
> that decay and growth
> are static patterns but to focus only on decay or
> growth is to take away
> their dynamic quality for now you've locked a static
> pattern into an it
> must be either/or. What do you think of this?
> [Ron]
> (simplified) yes I agree, focusing too much on any
> one concept is locking it into a Either/or situation
> as I stated before,even in the understanding of it,
> it begins to be locked into this.
Into the understanding of what? it is locked into
what? Static patterns that are open to dynamic
quality are not stuck, hung-up, or dead.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
