> > mozilla.org does not claim that it is. As Simon said, use Netscape
> > newsgroups for bashing Netscape, please :-)
> 
> When Netscape starts acting like they care about something besides marketing
> points, I will more...

So you are saying you are yelling at us because Netscape won't listen?

> > As I have said on this subject before, go away and inhale the specs for
> > HTML4, CSS 1 and 2, the DOM, XML, RDF, IMAP, POP3, FTP, HTTP, etc. etc.
> > When you've done that, go away and study the millions of broken web pages
> > that people will expect Netscape 6 to get right. Then come back and
> > re-express that disbelief :-)
> 
> Dude...it eats RAM, it doesn't support LDAP at all, 

Note LDAP is not on the above list :-)

> the interface is slow,
> buggy, and interface ridden, Helper apps are broken, no secure email.
> Standards support is immaterial until the thing is useable without needing
> 60+ MB of RAM for IMAP and browsing.

Rubbish. If it worked now but had crap standards support, we would have
spent the last two years recoding Netscape 4.x.

> >> I despise Netscape for
> >> blaming anyone else but themselves for the NS6 Debacle.
> >
> > Are they?
> 
> They tend to put out this message of "We only use what Mozilla gives us".

Where, exactly, is this message put out? I have not had this impression at
all.

Gerv

Reply via email to