> It is not like I am breaking any laws. If I remember right, LAME is GLP, > that means that I can do whatever I want as long as I make the source > available. The LAME project should know this more than anyone as they > were just a patch until just recently. (Okay, someone can knock my use of > recently too if you want -- recent for me).
Yes, Lame is LGPL and so you are free to modify it if you make your changes publically available. I will certainly sound harsh to you but I'd even suggest this extreme thing: Adding a restriction to the Lame licence stating that it's forbidden to make any change to libmp3lame that would prevent it from adding the "LAME" string into padding. Regards, ---- Gabriel Bouvigne www.mp3-tech.org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at: http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/
