On Tue, 2 Oct 2001 20:17:53 +0200, "Steve Lhomme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I really don't understand why you're so concerned that some data are written >in a binary file, as long as these audoi data are played and not modified. >Being LAME or whatever other name. Do you spend your life looking at your >binary files for funny data ? > >I don't think itshould be added to the lame CVS, because, as previously >mentionned the ONLY thing that would really change is make life easier to >license breakers. I find this attitude stupid. Here you guys are... using an ILLEGAL product (or did you pay the legally required licensing fees?), then bitching, because someone wants to remove the branding. I don't get it. Sounds like thieves complaining they got robbed. BTW, no, I prefer the branding in the files, as it makes knowing what encoder used easier to detect when downloading from file sharing services. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at: http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/
