On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Masayuki Hatta <mha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, thanks for comment! > > 2017-08-10 5:02 GMT+09:00 Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com>: > > >> Basically I made them for my own convenience, and still need to be > >> polished, but I think those are ok quality. I'm a Debian developer, so > I > >> can upload them to the official Debian archive if you want. > > > > Wow. That would be .. not sure. Good and bad, mostly because we are not > that > > stable, and do not use version numbers ... > > Yes, that's what I meant "if you want". OK, yes, I think I want that. The positives outweigh the negatives. > I can put them into > "experimental", but I guess most suitable way for now is setting up a > PPA(personal package archive). Then we can do "apt-get install > opencog". I can setup one at my own server, but if you want I can > help setting up it somewhere under opencog.org. > Whatever is easiest... > > Building opencog & friends is quite complicated for newbies like me, > so setting up an official PPA would help them a lot. > Yes, that is one of the big positives to having a package. > > BTW, many software in Debian these days doesn't have version numbers > or the concept of "release" (simply uses Git repo snapshot), so that's > ok. > OK. We are constantly fixing bugs or adding features, so if someone complains "this doesn't work" , our standard answer is "use the latest". > > > https://github.com/opencog/moses/pull/49 > https://github.com/opencog/cogutils/pull/80 > > I'm not sure these fixes are appropriate, so please review carefully. > Nil merged them. They looked OK to me. > > >> Also I killed BackwardChainerUTest in atomspace for now. > > > > Hmm. That always passes for me on the current Debian stable, always. I'm > > guessing now that maybe it is a guile-2.0 vs guile-2.2 bug. I bet it > will > > pass with guile-2.2 > > > > https://github.com/opencog/atomspace/issues/1318 > > Yes, as I said in that thread, I'm still using guile 2.0.13. Now > guile-2.2 packages are entering into Debian unstable (still in NEW > queue), so I will try it later. > OK. Tell the Debian folks that 2.2 really is much better than 2.0. I've been using it for 2+ years now, from when it was 2.1.x and it was consistently better in just about every way. (I can also tell you where its broken, but that's a different matter). --linas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA34YWyPNE-L%3DzrcAuz%3DWXkZ9e-grTam%2B4LEKn%3DBiG0CZqA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
