I'm aware that plugins, and the windowing system examples, don't get built if CMake doesn't find the dependencies.
My question is specifically aimed at the contents of the binaries that will be posted to the OSG Wiki Web page for users to download. Someone usually builds them and posts them, so I'm just wondering if there is some organization behind this, some minimum contents requirement, so that the binaries for different platforms all have the same set of plugins and examples. I think it would be a bad thing if someone decided to build a set of binaries for distribution on the OSG Wiki, but failed to get the necessary dependencies, and posted a set of binaries for download that was missing some functionality available in the binaries for other platforms. Paul Martz Skew Matrix Software LLC http://www.skew-matrix.com +1 303 859 9466 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sukender Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:44 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: Re: [osg-users] 2.8.0-rc5 VC8 packages available + questions Hi Paul, Yes, pakages contain examples. And as far as I know, plugins depend on what you selected in CMake. So if you disable everything (or if CMake doesn't find the dependencies), then your package will have no plugins. Sukender PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine - http://pvle.sourceforge.net/ Le Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:03:59 +0100, Paul Martz <[email protected]> a écrit: > Just a question regarding the contents of the binary packages... I > assume they contain: > * All of core OSG (osg, osgUtil, osgDB, osgViewer) > * All the NodeKits (osgShadow, osgSim, osgGA, etc.) > * All the applications (osgviewer, osgconv, etc.) > > Questions: > * Do the binaries also contain all the examples? > * What about viewer examples for the various windowing systems (wx, > qt, etc.)? > * And which (if any) plugins were excluded? > > This info is for the new Quick Start Guide. Thanks. > > Paul Martz > Skew Matrix Software LLC > http://www.skew-matrix.com > +1 303 859 9466 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Sukender > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:59 AM > To: OpenSceneGraph Users > Subject: Re: [osg-users] 2.8.0-rc5 VC8 packages available + questions > > Hi JS, > > Well, the 'all' package was just for me. As package maintainers, I > think we should provide separate packages as you say, or averything > ('all' + separated). > > Sukender > PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine - > http://pvle.sourceforge.net/ > > > Le Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:39:52 +0100, Jean-Sébastien Guay > <[email protected]> a écrit: > >> Hi Sukender, >> >>> 1. Both debug and release packages contain generated documentation >>> (So > you have a "Overwrite file?" prompt from the unarchiver une unziping both). > Do you think we should disable the inclusion (or building) of the doc > when in debug, or is it safer to keep as it is? >> >> I would vote for a different approach: upload separate packages >> instead of the -all package. That way people can download what they >> need, and "automatically" the documentation will not be there twice. >> >> But if we really want to keep the -all package as the official one, >> then I would say that only the debug package should contain the docs. >> To do any development on Windows you need both the release and debug >> packages, but if you only want to run osgviewer you will only >> download release, and in that case the docs are of no use to you. >> >>> 2. I saw that "Cygwin" and "nmake" sections on > http://www.openscenegraph.org/projects/osg/wiki/Community/PackageMaint > ainers ... Is there any difference between *binaries* generated from > MinGW-gcc and Cygwin-gcc? And for nmake, I guess it uses the MSVC > compiler, right? So binaries are not different from "pure" MSVC ones, > or am I wrong? >>> This could be confusing: if you use an "nmake" build, will this be a >>> VC7, > VC8, or VC9 one? Moreover, I thought that Cygwin, MinGW and nmake > packages are named against the compiler (it shows "gcc" and "vc" in > the name). So I suggest these sections to be removed, but I just need confirmation. >> >> I'm the one who put those sections, I don't even know if they're needed. >> You could remove them and someone else can add them in the future if >> they're really needed. And yes, someone else (Mattias?) said that >> nmake will use msvc to build so it's the same as msvc, so we can just >> remove that one. >> >> Thanks, >> >> J-S > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph. > org > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph. > org _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
