Hi Jean-Sébastien, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay < jean-sebastien.g...@cm-labs.com> wrote: > > I would prefer to add it to the description string of the node(s) on which > a material is applied, since a model might have multiple materials on > different nodes... i.e. your way would work if the model was made using a > texture atlas so the same texture applies to the whole model, but if that > isn't the case and multiple textures need to be applied to different parts > of the model then we can't just put the material at the root node...
The exporter applies the material statesets to the osg::Drawable object, which does not support description strings. I can add the description to the parent osg::Geode. However, keep in mind that the geode can contain multiple drawables, where each drawable has a unique material applied. So you could still have multiple descriptions applied to the geode. So would you prefer adding the descriptions to the geode or root node? > The format seems fine to me. Your separator is space, which seems more > readable to me than the vertical bar we were discussing before, but it means > parsers will have to handle the case where the filename is quoted and has > spaces in it. Plus do any map names have spaces in them? In your list in a > previous post, there was "Specular Level" that has a space... If you output > it as Specular_Level for example, that's perfect I think. > Actually, I've decided on using the tab character. This should avoid conflicts with filenames and seems more readable to me. Cheers, Farshid
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
