Thread: EVD:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00142.html JA:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00143.html
Peircers, I had a lot of trouble with the first paragraph of my last post. Among other things, pace Cat Stevens and Rod Stewart, I decided that in this case the first cut is probably the shallowest, and that was just the least of its problems, so here is the rewrite I posted on my blog, where I believe I managed both to clarify and generalize the criterion rather succinctly: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/03/24/pragmatic-theory-of-truth-%e2%80%a2-7/ Viewing the normative science of logic and its object, truth, in the medium of a triadic sign relation, the first cut among notions of truth divides those that take the object domain into account in a fundamental way from those that regard truth as a predicate of signs alone. Regards, Jon -- inquiry into inquiry: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ academia: https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey oeiswiki: https://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
