I also agree with Peter. Is it possible that we all (that is, all who participated in this discussion of falsifiability & fallibilism) are in agreement? If that is indeed so, it might represent a kind of first here! Best, Gary
>>> Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[email protected]> 8/5/2011 2:22 PM >>> I agree with Peter. Steven On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Skagestad, Peter wrote: > Gary, > > I agree that falsifiability entails the fallibility of scientific knowledge. > But the fallibilty of perceptual judgements, which is affirmed by both Peirce > and Popper, appears to me to be an independent conclusion, not entailed by > the falsifiability of hypotheses. > > Peter > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L listserv. To remove yourself from this list, send a message to [email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the message. To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]
