At 10:10 PM 7/21/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > I actually think he has a point that we should strive to create one good
> > framework for PHP. This is very much like PEAR trying to give people good
> > framework/class solutions.
>
>If you had read my message you would have seen that I suggested it may fit
>within PEAR.  He was asking for cmf.php.net though which I just don't see
>happening.
>
>And frankly, looking at the quality of his site compared to other content
>management frameworks out there, I don't see his being at the top of the
>heap.  That doesn't mean it couldn't be one day.  But if you are seriously
>suggesting saying "yes" at this point and setting up cmf.php.net for him
>and basically framing his system as *the* PHP content management system,
>then please say so.

I don't think we need to say "no" before the PEAR guys take a look at it 
and maybe discuss it in more detail with the author. I just didn't 
understand the rush of you saying "no" without waiting for others to 
respond and discussing it in more details. We might come to the conclusion 
that it's a lousy idea but I prefer coming to that conclusion hearing other 
opinions too. We might come to a conclusion that if a zillion things are 
changed it might be nice to have. Or the discussion might spawn a new Pear 
framework.

Andi


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to