The above addresses only your pil32 problem. I had no idea re pil64 on Android so glad you sorted it :)
On 3 February 2017 at 13:06, dean <deangwillia...@gmail.com> wrote: > >the future of PicoLisp is dark. > That sounds about right...I run openbsd and they've just made v6.0 > Linux- incompatible because they don't like the way it's going. > Pil64 compiles fine on the latest openbsd BTW. > > Assuming that Wine packages are more numerous than Picolisps...you could > do a native Windows version in Powerbasic for Wine. Not only would this up > your linux exposure but Linux is only 2% of the desktop market whilst > Windows has about 80%, > > I smiled when I saw your reasons for moving from C to asm because > Powerbasic does ALIGN etc in it's stride without needing to drop down to > it's industrial strength built in assembler. It also runs on win95 to 10 > and produces exes for the same, both without any dependencies. How about > that for stable. It also has very fast dynamic arrays. > > I'd prefer to work in 64 bit asm but would be very happy to assist you in > any way I can to see Picolisp do well as I'm sure others would be. Whatever > you decide just let us know how we can help. I'm very new to Picolisp but > can already see that it's much too good not to do well. > > > On 3 February 2017 at 08:41, Lindsay John Lawrence < > lawrence.lindsayj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I hope it is not dark. >> I am just starting on my adventure using PicoLisp and having a wonderful >> time of it. >> >> Having said that, I have never used any of the distribution packages. >> Picolisp is simple to compile with minimal dependencies. Thank you for >> that as well Alex. >> >> On my laptop machine I have just been compiling the latest download >> whenever it is available. >> It also runs extremely well in a minimal TinyCore Linux image. >> Tinycore+Picolisp+core system utils makes for a great sandbox in a few >> tens of megabytes as either a virtualbox or as a bootable stick >> >> I think I also compiled it on Android a few months ago (in Termux) >> without issue. I'll have to try it again there. >> >> Keep the light on :) >> >> /Lindsay >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the future of PicoLisp is dark. I'm not sure if it can survive in >>> packaged >>> distribution. >>> >>> Ubuntu doesn't support it any more, probably due to the PIE (position >>> independent executable) on x86-64. >>> >>> And at least on Android they seem to demand switching to Clang. The >>> 32-bit >>> versions of PicoLisp (pil32 and mini) which are written in C cannot be >>> compiled >>> on Clang, because Clang doesn't support dynamically allocated arrays, >>> which >>> pil32 depends on. As far as I notices, pil64 also has trouble on >>> Clang/Android. >>> >>> :( Alex >>> -- >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >>> >> >> >
