the ability to import gerber files is extremely useful, not just for
checking the gerber.
as others have suggested, using Protel for checking gerber suffers from the
problem that errors in intepreting the gerber standards may be duplicated
in the import routines. They could *not* be considered to have been
developed independently.
the Protel octagon problem stems from an ambiguity in the original RS-274
(or RS274X, perhaps) specification. An octagon is plotted as a polygon with
8 sides. What is rotation zero? Most of us would pick the wrong answer,
i.e., a different answer than the people who dreamed up the gerber spec
decided was right. This is because we think of an octagon as being
unrotated when the flats are aligned with the x and y axes. However, the
polygon command is a generic regular polygon, and the only reasonable way
to define rotation zero in that case is with a vertex on one of the axes. I
think it is the y-axis, but I'm not sure. You had to read the specification
very, very carefully to get this right. It was later revised to make the
matter a little more clear, but by then the damage had been done. Protel
then faced the problem of whether or not to change it. If they changed it,
existing designs might end up incorrect.
They did not do the right thing, I think; they should have, as soon as the
problem was discovered, created, at least, a warning message whenever
octagonal apertures were used. Perhaps a text file could have been written
to the gerber plot set explicitly stating what interpretation was being
used. In that case, it would have been okay to go ahead and correct the
program. Instead, they did nothing, and this problem continues to bite
users from time to time. I don't know how DXP deals with this, I suspect
that it does nothing, but I'd love to be wrong.
Importing gerbers has two options: batch and single file import. Batch
import brings the files back in to the presumed original layers used. There
can be some problems with this, but for quick gerber viewing, this would be
the choice. Single file import takes the file into the current active
layer. This is extremely useful for exploding, for example, a polygon to
primitives. I've used it to make assembly drawings, plotting the silkscreen
text and bringing that back, merged with pads, to a mech layer.
Protel gerber import was designed to import its own gerber, it does not
necessarily work with gerber from other CAD systems even though they are
RS-274X compatible. However, it is usually possible to massage such gerber
into a form that Protel can import; this can be very useful in CAD conversion.
As to CAMtastic, it was developed completely independently from Protel, so
unless they have monkeyed with it since buying it to make it more
"protel-compatible" -- which I doubt -- it would be fine for checking gerber.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Alfonso Baz
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Bevan Weiss
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Tony Karavidas
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Alfonso Baz
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Norbert Hoppe
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Jon Elson
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing gerber files rlamoreaux
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing Gerber Files Steve Smith
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing Gerber Files Harry Selfridge
- Re: [PEDA] Viewing Gerber Files Phillip Stevens