I guess my original 1-5 hours after the fact joke should have been 1-5 weeks...
_____________ Brian Guralnick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Reagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 5:25 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,butt....I am having reservations > Ian > > I have been using 2004 for about three weeks and have found three global > edits that the "new and improved" method can not handle. In 99SE I could > create a net class called AD. If I wanted to show only the RATS nets for > that class I could edit net ADO change the name to AD* and check unhide. > All of the nets beginning with AD would show. The net class would now be > avaliable for viewing. This can not be done in either DXP or 2004. > > Another lost feature: If you want to edit the text size in a selected group > of components..... it also cant be done. There are hoops and games you can > play but it cant be done easily > > And I ....will post the third one this evening after I verify it on 2004. > Stay tuned. > > > All this said 2004 is much better than DXP. Next week I am going to post an > objective list of lost features between 99se and 2004. There are a host > of bugs still in the program that are "dangerous". These bugs exist in 99 > and are still in 2004 > > The SPECTRA output is great! IT now exports net classes. This is big > time! > > Mike Reagan > EDSI > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John A. Ross [RSDTV] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 4:59 PM > To: 'Protel EDA Forum' > Subject: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Protel Hell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:32 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great, > > > > productivity, productivity, productivity > > > > those are the three things that need improvement in DXP > > Do you have suggestions how? > > You could help by posting what you like, do not like, or what you see as > non-productive with your proposed solution, any other constructive comments > here or to > > The dxp mailing list at > > http://forums.altium.com > > Or at > > http://www.proteluser.com/bbs/forumdisplay.php?f=10 > > John > > > >From: "Brooks,Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: 'Protel EDA Forum' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great, > > >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:01:07 -0800 > > > > > > > >My advice to Altium, Improve our productivity through the > > use of smart > > >tools, not more complexity. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar FREE! > > http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/ > > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
