On Monday, 5 February 2018 00:55:34 CET Unman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 08:14:57PM +0100, 'Tom Zander' via qubes-users 
> > * Having nothing but python APIs for your operating system is something
> > that makes no sense. Python was never meant for servers, or even big
> > applications. Finding a full-stack python developer is more rare than
> > finding a Bitcoin C++ developer.
> I'm not sure how much of this is just trolling.

It is not trolling.

> You obviously dont mean uses like Google, DropBox, YouTube, Reddit etc.
> Perhaps you dont know about Eve Online? Mercurial? Blender?

Absolutely none of these use python for anywhere near the same percentage of 
components as Qubes does.
Google is a good example, for instance they shipped proto-buffers. Which 
have bindings in a long list of languages (20 or so).

Check wikipedia for those examples, reality is much more sobering that you 

> There are exceptional developers working in many companies -Google,
> NASA, Astra Zeneca, to name a few, all using python. The fact that
> you arent comfortable with it is fine, but not a reason to reject it.

Thats moving the goalpost. Naturally there are many experienced python 

Let me re-state the point for your benefit;

Having nothing but python bindings and having practically all your 
components written in python is without a doubt very realistically limiting 
the amount of people you can get hacking on Qubes. Add on top of that the 
content matter, which is highly complex and in many cases includes 
networking or cross-VM communication or hard-core linux components and you 
limit the amount of people even more, to the extend I mentioned above.

Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to