On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:54:44PM +0200, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > To me it sounds like some people have not fully understood how Razor > works and why it actually (even version 1) works. One major reason why > there are not many false positives is that a message which arrives at > my mailbox and which is falsely reported to Razor is unlikely to > arrive in someone else's mailbox.
Unless it's legitimate mailing list mail that spamassassin tags as spam. Then if there are enough dimwits auto-reporting spamassassin-tagged mail, lots of people will report the same legitimate mail. People who use razor are free to use spamassassin also if they wish. People who use razor may also want to use razor *instead* of spamassassin. What you're saying is, "I'm using spamassassin, and I'm going to make sure you do too." > Anyway, Matt and Jeffrey and fellows, you won't be able to stop people > from reporting non-spam messages (just by shouting out STOP!). You > will have to find a way to deal with real stupid users and with people > like me. Change the program, change your own thresholds or whatever. "I'm intent on poisoning the razor database, so you'd better deal with it." > BTW, I am auto-reporting and I am revoking falsely reported messages. I hope they revoke your ID. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
