On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andreas Schamanek wrote: # I have been asking this list here whether to auto-report or not to # auto-report. And I was told to not report to Razor1 but to report # to Razor2. That's what I am doing. And, I am reviewing the whole # process. Falsely reported messages get revoked. # # If an official developer thinks that this is a bad idea I will stop # it immediately.
I think a clear distinction needs to be made between the automation of the _decision_ process vs. the automation of the _reporting_ process. It's okay to automate the SPAM reporting process. Usually this means various flavours of bouncing mail to an auto-report address, running an automated tool to report the spam for you, etc. There's no reason why interacting with the Razor2/SpamNet network should be painful. It is _not_ okay for the SPAM decision process to be automated. Razor2/SpamNet is about human determination _only_. No bots, no machines, no algorithms. No message SPAM or otherwise should find its way into the network without a human being specifically putting it there. Bearing in mind this distinction, please address your reporting process accordingly. Sorry for the confusion, I think we'll update our FAQ with this. Best, --jordan ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
