Quoting Andreas Schamanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jeffrey Taylor wrote: [snip] > > looks like it is turning Razor into a duplicate of SpamAssassin. > > This is something I just don't understand. SA and Razor follow 2 > completely different concepts. Razor can never be a mirror of > SpamAssassin. > Anyway, SpamAssassin (even without the integration of Razor) works > very well at our site. So, even if Razor would be a mirror, it stil > would work ;)
If a large number of sites auto-report SpamAssassin tagged output (as opposed to auto-reporting unused/honeypot/spam-trap accounts), then the Razor database is almost entirely a dated duplicate of SA. > > > Since I am already paying the cost of running SA, running Razor is > > starting to look like a waste of CPU cycles. > > Then just don't use it. If auto-reporting overwhelms the people reported and revoked entries, i.e., there is precious little intelligence in it, I won't use it. But I would prefer it to be a database of human intelligence. There are other sources for machine intelligence, SpamAssassin, SpamBouncer, the various Bayesian filters, etc. > > > Quoting Andreas Schamanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Get out your flame throwers! Here is one of these "blatantly ignorant > > > users": I *am* auto-reporting. And guess what: If Razor (and the other > > [full quote of my own message removed. please, do not send full quotes.] > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
