Hmmm - here's an alternate possibility:
1. Set up a folder for each client volume to be backed up
2. Set each folder as a volume using the subvolume option in Retrospect
3. Create a duplicate script for each of these. Using the duplicate
function with replace entire HD, you will get a mirror of each volume on
the server - retrospect is smart enough to do an incremental duplicate
so these should run pretty quickly
4. Then backup the server locally to a handy tape device.
This will require more active management and tracking as you won't be able
to use Retrospect's advanced search features by client name since it will
all be one data source, but if you organize your server structure carefully,
you should be OK. You also won't be able to use the smarts of the backup
server scripts and will be stuck with scheduled ones (not critical for a
smaller backup group tho').
NB - this only works if you have a clear controlled client group that you
know exactly the available capacity and can ensure that you have sufficient
space on the server.
Ancillary issues are that if you have a mix of Windows and Mac clients there
are some naming issues that may arise since the Mac can't handle names over
32 characters, and if you decide to try this from a Windows box, you'll need
to ensure that you have things set up to properly handle MacOS resource
forks. Sigh - nothing's ever as simple as it first looks.
> From: Wade Masshardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:47:23 -0600
> To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination
>> Reply to: RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination
>> Up until Mac OS 9, the maximum file size was 2 GB. Now that Apple has
>> lifted that limit, we need to change Retrospect to reflect that new
>> capability. We'll probably be doing this in our next release.
> That will be great. Any idea when this release might be forthcoming?
> In the meantime, the method described, namely using a bunch of file
> backup sets (11 in my case) as the destination for a backup should
> work, right? My main concern (I haven't actually tried it yet,
> tonight is the first night) is that Retrospect will automatically
> move on to the next file backup set when the first one is full and so
> one (I have about 14 gigs worth of data that gets backed up when I do
> a recycle backup.) If this is what happens, then everything should
> be peachy. If not, I'll have to find an alternative, like making 11
> 2GB Diskcopy images and using those as the target.
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]