Claudio,

I can't guarantee anything on recruiting developers but I can put it out
there on Apple developer lists. I am not a developer myself but I can
test some builds. I have all three platforms running at home (Linux, Mac
and Windows). I have installed the Windows alpha and it is very
promising (Thanks Richard).

Dave

On 5/13/12 6:56 PM, Cláudio Pinheiro wrote:
> I'm interested in a Mac port, and I may help with coding.
> Most of my coding experience involves portable code between Linux,
> Windows, ARM and microcontrollers, and I develop for Mac as a hobby.
> Having said that, I believe the biggest problem I see today in
> Rosegarden is the following mentality:
> "I'm a Linux user and I want a tool to help me making music on
> Linux.". So Rosegarden is chosen because it's the most comprehensive
> DAW for the Linux platform, making the choice to use it subordinated
> to the choice of which operating system one wants to use. As the
> Linux-using musicians demographics is a tiny one is somewhat natural
> to expect that Rosegarden's visibility is minimal. And as Linux-using
> musicians programmers with free time and interest are even rarer,
> things pile up on the TODO queue (111 open bugs and 144 open feature
> requests).
> Let's take the opposite example: Mixxx. Multiplatform, Qt-based,
> low-latency DJ mixing program, runs on Linux, Windows and Mac OS X,
> GPL-licensed, free in App Store, has 800+ reviews (4.5 stars) and a
> thriving community.
> What's the main difference between Mixxx and Rosegarden as end-user
> products? When somebody wants to go into DJ'ing he/she can choose
> Mixxx to do the job as a (better) alternative to the commercial ones.
> When somebody wants to write music with a DAW he/she'll try to use a
> program that fulfills its needs. If he/she uses Linux Rosegarden is a
> choice. Had Rosegarden be multiplatform, the mentality would be "I
> want a tool to help me making music" instead of "I'm a Linux user and
> I want a tool to help me making music on Linux.". When we remove the
> platform from the equation we broaden Rosegarden's target audience
> tenfold? Thirtyfold? If we were able to have iOS and Android ports, oh my.
> Rosegarden needs broad visibility by potential users, so it can
> generate a critical mass that would attract developers that would
> maintain a sustained growth and (even) better codebase and
> documentation. To achieve it Rosegarden must walk the multiplatform
> path. It must be the top priority now for the future's greater good.
> With this in mind, somebody said that would be able to recruit coders
> to work on a Mac port, please do so and ask them to do it in a
> multiplatform way. Somebody said that could help with the homepage.
> Please step up and do something "seksy", atractive. Let's have
> commitment. Let's make Rosegarden reach what no other DAW I'm aware of
> has reached and Mixxx, LibreOffice and others had reached in their
> respective niches. We have lots of success examples all around us, so
> it's time to act upon.
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Ian Gardner <ilgard...@yahoo.co.uk
> <mailto:ilgard...@yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     > For what it's worth, I think it's evident that the test framework
>     > Rosegarden "should" be using is the Qt one. (As least, if it's any
>     > good -- which it is; it's pretty nice.)
>     >
>     >
>     > Chris
>     >
>
>     *raises hand* yes I'm potentially interested in looking at stuff
>     around testing. I'll need to bone up on the Qt test stuff though,
>     never having used it before.
>
>     I'm much more interested in the macro top level testing I was
>     talking about earlier (scripting out composition building by
>     capturing the commands issued) rather than the gnarly micro unit
>     testing of writing tests inside every single class and function in
>     RG. I exaggerate there of course, but hopefully you catch my drift!
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Ian.
>
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Live Security Virtual Conference
>     Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>     threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>     Discussions
>     will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>     malware
>     threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>     _______________________________________________
>     Rosegarden-devel mailing list
>     rosegarden-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:rosegarden-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> - use the link
>     below to unsubscribe
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rosegarden-user mailing list
> Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

Reply via email to