Dear Veeresh,

Nusli Wadia is an Indian citizen (now). After a prolonged legal battle
in the SC (longer than Sonia Gandhis') he established his
Indian-"ness" (sorry for the poor pun). 

Sarbajit

"Jinnah must be rolling in his grave

Author:
Publication: The Friday Times (Pakistan)
Date: November 17, 2000

Nusli Wadia may be the grandson of Pakistan's founder Mohammad Ali
Jinnah, the Quaid-i-Azam, but he lives in India, and is proud to be an
Indian, according to British journalist David Gardner who interviewed
Wadia in Bombay recently

Not only that, says Gardner, but Wadia is also on the friendliest of
terms with the government of the Hindu revivalist Bharatiya Janata
party (BJP), the self-styled nemesis of the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, with which India has been in conflict since Nehru and Jinnah
went their separate ways in 1947.  The Quaid-i-Azam (Great Leader), as
Jinnah was known to his followers, must be rolling in his grave,
writes Gardner.

Across the Indian subcontinent, dynasties dominate the socio-political
landscape - the Nehrus and Gandhis in India, the Bhuttos of Pakistan,
the Bandaranaikes in Sri Lanka.  But one dynasty that never became
established was that of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan,
mainly because his only daughter, Dina, stayed on in India after
partition in 1947.  His only grandson, Nusli Wadia, still lives in Bombay.

But Wadia, an urbane textiles baron, has a much more complex and
interesting subcontinental identity than any mere dynast.  And after
nearly three hours at table with him, I would hazard an unchivalrous
guess that he is a better lunch companion than Benazir Bhutto, Sonia
Gandhi or Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga.

Part of the identity is the religious melange.  Jinnah was a Shi'ite
Muslim who married a Parsi - Zoroastrian Persians who fled Islam to
settle in India.  Yet he refused to speak again to his daughter Dina
when she married a Parsi, albeit one of part-Irish descent and hence a
Christian convert.

To convolute matters further, Nusli Wadia, born a Christian, decided
to convert back to Zoroastrianism, settling back into the industrially
wealthy Parsi community of Bombay: old money and old economy.  Thus,
it was about the "new" economy we spoke first, he sipping his Virgin
Mary, me nursing my Merlot.

We were in the Zodiac Grill atop the turn of the century Taj Mahal
hotel, which offers a panoramic sweep from the Arabian Sea and the
nearby Gateway to India, across the garish forest of Bombay billboards
where Bollywood vies for space with the mushrooming dotcoms, all the
way to the slums, interstitial tissue of India's commercial capital.

'The infrastructure is simply not there to justify all this investment
in websites,' he says.  In the US, the e-commerce Industry is
struggling and they do have infrastructure; here, there are 'no
consumers, no connectivity [of telephones or bandwidth], and the
retail industry is not aggregated as it is in the west.  It's not even
where the west was 20 years ago with your local grocer [since] it's
just as likely to be a handcart.  The whole thing's totally fragmented
with no logistics.'

In any case, he says, shooting an elegant cuff and reminding me of his
grand-father's reputation as a dandy, 'how many cricket portals and
lifestyle sites can you have with 1.4m internet users'?

All this makes robust sense amid the relentless hype about India's
booming info-tech services industry, based primarily on western
outsourcing of 'software solutions' to India and importing of software
engineers from India.  'It's really about the export of Indian human
skills, whether from India or outside India,' he says, because
'despite everything, we've got an education infrastructure which can
produce the sort of people for this business'.

Even so, the software industry's projections are that it will employ
2.2m people by 2008, by when India's population will have reached
about 1.1bn.  Widespread and windy talk among Indian politicians that
this amounts to a 'paradigm shift' which obviates the need for an
'old' economy is pure fantasy.  Wadia wonders, moreover, if there will
be a big market for software 'applications' to raise productivity and
make India more competitive.  'If you don't have an old economy, where
do you apply your applications?' he asks.

But pillar of the old economy that he is, his flagship company, Bombay
Dyeing, came under siege after our lunch, as the target of a hostile
takeover bid, a rare occurrence in India.  The contest, still
unresolved, recalled a bitter dispute in the 1980s between Wadia and
the Ambanis, the family behind Reliance, the big petrochemicals group
that rules the corporate roost in Bombay.

As he moves from salmon to pomfret, and I pass from asparagus to lamb,
I ask him whether he thinks these things happen in part because of his
ancestry.

'When they want to get at me, yes, of course.' Wadia pauses a second
and then tries that again: 'When somebody wants to get at me, and
says, 'yes, but he's Jinnah's grandson', my answer is always, 'Yes,
and I'm very proud of it'.

But that has nothing to do with Pakistan, he empahsises.  'I'm very
much an Indian and very proud to be an Indian.'

But the spat with the Ambanis pales beside Wadia's 1987-89 feud with
the dynasty - then personified by Rajiv Gandhi - towards the end of a
premiership that the end of a premiership that began amid a
Camelot-like aura and finished in scandal.

The feud began improbably, with the Central Bureau of Investigation
arresting Wadia for 'misdeclaring citizenship'.  The hotel staff where
he was staying had filled in his registration form as an Indian
citizen whereas, at the time, Rugby-educated Wadia had a British
passport.  But why was he targeted, I ask?

Seemingly because of his association with opposition figures,
including some from the BJP, and a close connection with the Indian
Express newspaper, which, uncomfortably for Gandhi, was introducing
investigative journalism to India.

At any rate, the government instituted tax inquiries going back 16
years, tying Wadia up in the courts for two years.  They confiscated
his passport and, in 1989, issued him with a deportation order.

The experience clearly still rankles but, after 42 court hearings and
2,500 pages of interrogation, Wadia won.  'Thank God for the Indian
courts,' he says, with feeling.

His relationship with the BJP, he resumes gingerly, goes back to 1966
when it was a marginal organisation known as the Jana Sangh, and he
counts Atal Behari Vajpayee, the prime minister, and Jaswant Singh,
the Rajasthani aristocratic foreign minister with whom he shares a
taste for good claret, among his friends.

Not only this, but Wadia has only once been to Pakistan, aged 10.  He
got stuck there at an airport on one of his vividly remembered long
journeys home from boarding school in England.

'I was whisked out of the airport to see Fatima [Jinnah's late sister
and political soulmate].' Since then, despite frequent temptation, he
has scrupulously refused to visit Pakistan for fear of being used as
an endorsement by rival dynasties.

It's hard to get away from dynasties but Wadia tries, having another
stab at explaining his BJP attachments.

'Here I am, Jinnah's grandson, my background is Muslim, Christian and
Parsi....it's a contradiction isn't it?'

Well, yes, but perhaps in part explainable in terms of his
undercurrent of loathing for the Nehrus and the Gandhis.  I ask him if
he fears the BJP and its allies' episodic stoking of anti-Muslim and
anti-Christian animosity.

'It's the political system that is keeping Hindu Muslim antipathy
alive,' he says.  The Congress party and some of the caste-based
parties that emerged in the 1990s are exploiting and fanning the
grievances of Muslims "who have lived here for centuries, just to get
their votes.

'Nehru did it, and Mrs.  Gandhi continued to do it,' he says, before
retreating to make the charge a bit more general.  'It's the
politicians who are continuing to partition India, really'. "

--- In [email protected], "Veeresh Malik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Well, it seems that Mr. Nusli Wadia has not had any problems filing and 
> getting responses from IndGovt, regardless of his citizenship and/or 
> passport.
> 
> 


Reply via email to