Re: IPMI SOL setup on FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
At 09:07 AM 1/23/2013, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:52:17, Derek Ragona wrote: DR> I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F DR> motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right. DR> DR> These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI interface. DR> DR> I have both servers configured to use the dedicated IPMI NIC and these DR> NIC's are plugged into a separate unmanaged switch. DR> DR> Both systems boards are set to redirect com1. I changed /etc/ttys to run a DR> getty on /dev/ttyu0. I have com1 configured to 115,200 baud, 8, n, 1, no DR> flowcontrol in the BIOS. I in have /etc/ttys: DR> ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure /etc/ttys: ttyu1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure /boot/loader.conf: hint.uart.0.flags="0" hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" boot_serial="YES" boot_multicons="YES" comconsole_speed="115200" console="comconsole vidconsole" Anton, Thanks for answering. I thought: /etc/ttys: ttyu1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure is for com2? I also thought: hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" Is for com2? you said: hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" Is that for for a serial only console? I read in some posts, to use: hint.uart.1.flags="0x30" for both a local console with a serial console. I could not find much documentation on the uart or sio flags. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fresh installation 9.1
At 08:30 AM 1/23/2013, Polytropon wrote: On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:49:13 +0530, Hrisikesh sahu wrote: > Hi All, > I am facing a strange issue.. > I installed 9.1 release and installation went successful > After boot up i got this error - > > > File system had an unexpected inconsistency. > > ufs : /dev/ada0s1d (/var) > unknown error ; ! Help > Error - Aborting Boot > > Going to single user mode. > > # > > > Please help me if i need to do anything else. It seems that the /var partition has not been unmounted properly. Perform a manual file system check and retry. The command # fsck -yf /dev/ada0s1d should be applied in single user mode, with /var being unmounted. To make sure file systems are clean _prior_ to booting the system, put background_fsck="NO" into /etc/rc.conf; this may lead to longer startup times when something is "strange" regarding file systems, but it will prevent you from booting into a possibly damaged environment (which could cause more trouble and maybe even data loss, which justifies the longer boot time in my opinion). I setup a number of servers with 9.1 and had the same issue. I'm not sure why, all of the installation went with no errors. I ended up with this in rc.conf: fsck_y_enable="YES" background_fsck="NO" force_fsck="YES" After a few reboots I was able to take it out. Also if you have this in /etc/rc.conf: dumpdev="YES" It always does a dump even on reboot, which also marks the filesystems as dirty. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
IPMI SOL setup on FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right. These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI interface. I have both servers configured to use the dedicated IPMI NIC and these NIC's are plugged into a separate unmanaged switch. Both systems boards are set to redirect com1. I changed /etc/ttys to run a getty on /dev/ttyu0. I have com1 configured to 115,200 baud, 8, n, 1, no flowcontrol in the BIOS. I in have /etc/ttys: ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure Using one server, I start an IPMI SOL session to the other server. But all I get is the IPMI SOL output, no login prompt. If I reboot the server I am SOL connected to, I do see the BIOS boot messages, and even the initial FreeBSD boot prompt. I can even make boot prompt changes from the SOL session. Once boot starts the SOL gets no more output. I looked at both servers and the one I am using to initiate the SOL has /dev/ipmi0 and ipmitool working fine. On the server I am trying to connect to has /dev/ipmi1 and ipmitool errors: Could not open device at /dev/ipmi0 or /dev/ipmi/0 or /dev/ipmidev/0: No such file or directory These are identical motherboards. I suspect that because the one system creates /dev/ipmi1 instead of /dev/ipmi0 may be why the SOL output stops right after the boot starts. If I do: ln -s /dev/ipmi1 /dev/ipmi0 ipmitool works fine, until the next reboot. How can I get the one system to make /dev/ipmi0 instead of /dev/ipmi1? In FreeBSD 9.1 do I use hint.uart instead of hint.sio in /boot/loader.conf? Any help would be appreciated. -Derek derek at computinginnovations.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Virtualbox
At 10:49 PM 10/6/2012, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! When I try to start a virtual os in virtualbox i get an error. kldload vboxdrv.ko kldload: can't load vboxdrv.ko: Exec format error Rebuilt VB and still this error 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 12 15:13:06 CET 2012 GENERIC amd64 Check /boot/loader.conf or use kldload to load the module manually. kldstat will list the loaded modules. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: 32 bit to 64 bit
At 08:37 AM 6/27/2012, Tim Kellers wrote: I'm upgrading a 7.3 -STABLE installation to 8.x, then 9- Stable over the next few days. The hardware is a Dell 2950 that is capable of running 64 bit FreeBSD. The original installation was i386 32 bit and that is what it is running now. Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO64 allow a 32 bit installation to build a 64 bit kernel? I'd like to upgrade this machine to 64 bit AMD and I'd prefer not to do it from a DVD if I can do it from source. Has anyone tried this and succeeded (or failed spectacularly) on a remote install/upgrade? Tim Kellers The 2950's are a bit dated, so unless you have in excess of 4GB RAM, you don't need to move to 64-bit. If you do choose to go 64-bit, I agree with the other posts, simply do a fresh install. In doing a fresh install, save off the package list you have on the i386 build and reinstall those packages on the new 64-bit system. Doing a fresh install will also save you time, since you can go right to 9, rather than doing two upgrades. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firewall, blocking POP3
At 07:18 PM 5/30/2012, Robert Bonomi wrote: > From jbiq...@intranet.com.mx Wed May 30 13:48:05 2012 > Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:47:34 -0500 > To: Robert Bonomi > From: Jorge Biquez > Subject: Re: Firewall, blocking POP3 > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Hello. > > Thanks a lot!. Simple an elegant solution. > > I just did that and of course it worked I just was wondering... > what if I need to have the service working BUT want to block those > break attemps? IN this and other services. ? > My guess is that it is a never ending process? I mean, block one, > block another, another, etc? If one knows the address-blocks that legitimate customers will be using, one can block off access from 'everywhere else'. > What the people who has big servers running for hosting services are > doing? Or you just have a policy of strng passworrds, server > up-todate and let the attemps to try forever? There are tools like 'fail2ban' that can be used to lock out persistant doorknob-rattlers. Also, one can do things like allow mail access (POP, IMAP, 'whatever') only via a port that is 'tunneled' through an SSH/SSL connection. This eliminates almost all doorknob rattling on the mail access ports, but gets lots of attempts on the SSH port. Which is generally not a problem, since the SSH keyspace is vastly larger, and more evenly distributed, than that for plaintext passwords. To eliminate virtually all the 'noise' from SSH doorknob-rattling, run it on a non-standard port. This does =not= increase the actual security of the system, but it does greatly reduce the 'noise' in the logs -- so any actual attack attempt is much more obvious. You can use /etc/hosts.allow to list your "friendly" IP's allowed by protocol. This provides an easy way to block all foreign users. You can use wildcards in this file, so if you need to allow users in for POP access from an ISP, you can do that. Also, if you do have wide array of addresses you need to let in, you may want to put the email services in a jail. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD9 fails to install on HP Proliant (crash)
At 08:41 AM 5/31/2012, Ewald Jenisch wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install FreeBSD9 (64bit) on a HP Proliant server (ProLiant DL385 G1). Installation is done via remote-management ("iLO") basically by mounting the Installation-ISO. However a couple of seconds after booting the box crashes. Here's what I tried already: o) Re-download the installation ISO - same checksum - same result o) Instead of booting directly I issued the following two commands on the loader prompt: set kern.eventtimer.periodic=1 set kern.eventtimer.timer="LAPIC" followed by "boot" Neither of these helped. To cross-check I tried booting of a FreeBSD 8 installation media - no problems at all (besides that the machine is running FreeBSD8 currently without problems) Any clue what could be wrong here and what I can do in order to make this box boot from the installation media? Thanks much in advance for your help, -ewald You can try the boot options on the boot menu to try with ACPI disabled. I have experienced some crashes and some hangs when trying to boot different hardware via an ISO virtually mounted and also booting via USB key. I believe the issues come down to timing issues, where in the boot process the kernel expects to have some required /tmp space on physical disk. You may need to create a RAID volume you plan to use for the filesystems first. Also check compatibility with your hardware. While it can be a pain, to debug something like this, I have booted systems at data centers where I have a console connected and using a CD or DVD drive (external USB if no internal device is installed.) -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Swap files and panics
At 10:54 AM 5/29/2012, Warren Block wrote: Recently I rearranged partitions on an SSD. The swap partition was eliminated in favor of a swap file on /usr. This works, allows TRIM support on the swap space, and is easier to resize than a partition. However, sometimes the system panics on shutdown. It happens after "syncing disks", so the filesystems are fine, but it's disconcerting. I suspect but haven't yet managed to prove that it's only when swap is not empty. A race condition involving when the filesystems are unmounted? Or should there be some code in /etc/rc.d/addswap to run swapoff before shutdown? This is on a very recent 9-STABLE amd64, i5 2500K. rc.conf: swapfile="/usr/swap/swap" Did you remove the old swap file entry from /etc/fstab? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Cloud" software ?
At 06:15 AM 5/25/2012, Frank Bonnet wrote: On 05/25/2012 12:10 PM, Dennis Glatting wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 10:11 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello I'm searching for a "cloud software" :-) More precisely we would like to offer to our students and professors a kind of private cloud to access/manipulate their personnal data from almost anywhere and with almost any devices ... ( Personnal PC, Mac, smartphones and tablets ... etc ) There is a couple of cheap ways of doing this. First, download the free version of VMWare ESXi and partition your hardware. Another is to install VirtualBox, a Type-2 HyperVisor. Depending on what you consider a cloud, take a look at Hadoop. Hadoop isn't partitioning hardware but Hadoop and the applications that run on top of Hadoop can give you an interesting view of these technologies and how they can be applied to cloudy data. As for how to get data into/out-of the cloud, let me know how that works. :) Hi Dennis Thank you for that info ! gonna investigate the hadoop way. I have built and managed a couple large hadoop clusters. Contact me directly for more information. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: question about milter software
At 08:21 AM 5/25/2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote: Does anyone know milter software (or maybe anything else) to add to sendmail that can rewrite outgoing mail and add HTML footer automatically? Please do not tell me about how stupid HTML mail is at all - i know it, it is not my idea. thanks I have used milter with sendmail. You can add an outgoing email footer. If you need more information, email me directly. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Cloud" software ?
At 03:11 AM 5/25/2012, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello I'm searching for a "cloud software" :-) More precisely we would like to offer to our students and professors a kind of private cloud to access/manipulate their personnal data from almost anywhere and with almost any devices ... ( Personnal PC, Mac, smartphones and tablets ... etc ) Anyone could help ? Thank you Take a look at OpenStack http://openstack.org/ The latest release which is Essex, includes a web based dashboard. This is OpenSource, and definitely a work in progress but the Essex release should provide most of the "cloud" functionality. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: problems with networking and route command
At 07:07 AM 5/18/2012, David Banning wrote: > > It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that > > can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole > > lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands > > without success. > > You need to implement NAT on this box, since 192.168.0.0/16 is an RFC-1918 unrouteable private network range. I previously connected to the internet using ppp with the -nat option and now my connection has changed - so that makes sense. So I implemented natd. Unfortunately natd does not work as yet. I followed the setup as laid out in "man natd" and also used the layout in; http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipfw.php Here is my natd setup 1. Compiled IPFIREWALL & IPDIVERT into my kernel - went fine. Here is my rc.conf network related entries; natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="rl0" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" gateway_enable="YES" ifconfig_rl0="inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 255.255.255.240" defaultrouter="64.40.244.33" ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" ifconfig_vr0=up ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.1.1" network_interfaces="rl0 vr0 lo0" ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/firewall.rules" firewall_type="simple" firewall_logging="YES" dhcpd_ifaces="vr0" dhcpd_enable="YES" My firewall rules; ipfw add 64000 allow ip from any to any ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via rl0 ipfw add allow tcp from any to 192.168.2.1 139 ipfw add allow tcp from any to 192.168.1.1 139 ipfw add 6000 deny tcp from any to 64.40.244.36 139 ipfw add 6010 deny tcp from any to 64.40.244.36 445 ipfw add deny tcp from any to any 139 My /etc/natd.conf; interface rl0 use_sockets yes same_ports yes My /etc/services includes the line; natd 8668/divert # Network Address Translation socket Output of ifconfig; # ifconfig fwe0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 02:11:d8:b3:0e:43 ch 1 dma -1 vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::16d6:4dff:fe47:88ae%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 14:d6:4d:47:88:ae media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 64.40.244.36 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast 64.40.244.47 inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe66:7162%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 ether 00:11:95:66:71:62 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 >From my initial communication I have swapped the uses of the two network cards - which explains the reversal of entries for devices vr0 and rl0. Still I have server connection to the internet on rl0 and server connection to the network on vr0 - but the network cannot connect to the internet via rl0. If there are any commands that would help collect information leading to the answer I would appreciate any feedback. Try using the examples here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html That freebsddiary article is very old, and many versions ago. Essentially you need to forward the packets from your NAT'd private interface over to the interface on the internet. You can try this using an open firewall, sending all packets to test the setup. Then add rules to lock it down to only the ports you want to allow. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: need help on installing bsd in virtual box
At 05:01 PM 4/27/2012, dhillon sandeep wrote: Hi, I am struggling in installing the bsd in virtualbox i am totally new to unix, but have previously installed Ubuntu linux in my virtual box, i have dounloaded both the images bootonly and release iso, after creating the new virtual machine and starting it for first time and by selecting the iso image nothing is happening or getting installed in the virtual machine. I downloaded the iso images from your BSD website. Please let me know what i am doing wrong or what do i need to do to install bsd. Thanks Sandeep. You need to be specific on which version of virtualbox you are using and which version of FreeBSD. I have had no problem install FreeBSD in virtualbox, and in other virtual environments. I use the disk1 iso and boot that which brings up the FreeBSD installer. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Hardware booting problem
At 03:34 AM 9/15/2011, Doug Hardie wrote: I encountered a situation today that I do not understand. This is a very old i386 PC that does not have a usable CD drive. The existing drive uses a very funky SCSI connector that I have nothing for. The system disk is SCSI and there was one additional PATA drive used for additional storage. The PATA drive failed. It won't even stick around in /dev for more than a couple minutes after boot and there are lots of messages about bad sectors. The data is completely backed up and the that drive is over 5 years old. I removed the old drive and installed a new one. System will not boot. It hangs in the BIOS. Never gets around to installing the SCSI BIOS. My first guess was there was no boot sector on the SCSI drive. That seems unusual since my other systems boot off the SCSI drives just fine. This one used to also before I added the PATA drive. However, if I put the dead drive back in along with the new one, then it boots. This also implies that the boot sector was only on the PATA drive. But the PATA drive is for all intents and purposes dead. So how is it booting? Is there any way to look into the SCSI drive and see if there is a boot sector there? This is more a curiosity item as there are additional failures starting to occur in that computer. We are going to replace it. Its around 10 years old. Depending on your SCSI card BIOS, some allow you to set which LUN it boots. You may want to explore the SCSI settings, and try to set the new drive as the first boot device, then try removing the old drive. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8.0 retires into itself
At 06:48 AM 12/3/2009, Igor V. Ruzanov wrote: On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Derek Ragona wrote: |At 04:28 AM 12/3/2009, Igor V. Ruzanov wrote: |> Hello! |> |> I have updated FreeBSD 8.0 sources via cvsup and compiled system. uname -a |> shows: |> |> FreeBSD localhost 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #2: Mon Nov 30 20:15:12 MSD |> 2009 r...@localhost:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HOME-PAE i386 |> |> Machine has 3 physical interfaces: |> - em0 (PCI/Intel PWLA 8390 MT) |> - em1 (PCI/Intel PWLA 8390 MT) |> - fxp0 (PCI/Intel EtherExpress PRO/100) |> |> and 2 VLANs: vlan317 and vlan320. |> |> Also there is one interface built in motherboard: |> - ale0 (PCI-E/Atheros AR8121) |> |> One physical interface (em0) is in trunk mode (802.1Q) to configure these two |> VLANs (vlan317 and vlan320) interfaces. Machine acts as BGP router. It has 3 |> uplinks: |> - vlan317 |> - vlan320 |> - fxp0 |> |> and one backbone interface: |> - em1. |> |> Next, i recompiled all userland and made all necessary configurations after |> which the machine became as production BGP router installed in server room. |> So issue looks like the following: |> |> After 20-30 minutes of stable work, the system starts to "retire into |> itself": any user processes (bgpd, zebra, named) don't respond, For example a |> can't telnet to bgpd control terminal, telnet just dies showing: |> Trying 127.0.0.1... |> Connected to localhost. |> Escape character is '^]' |> |> I even tried to login into system from local console. But when i pressed |> Enter after username was typed, the console just hang. Power button also |> doesn't respond (in usual case pressing on Power button gives the machine is |> going to power off). One interesting thing: after system was booted, top |> command shows: |> |> system eats about 28-30% of CPU time |> interrupts eat about only 6-7% of CPU time |> all user processes eat less than 0-1% of CPU time |> |> On another working machine (same BGP router, but system is FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE |> p4) the picture seems to be different: |> |> system etas 9-10% of CPU time |> interrupts eat 15-16% of CPU time |> |> So my question is the REASONS that cause such system behavior. I read |> UPDATING, so kernel in FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE was largely reworked, in |> particular - SMPng in order to remove all non-MPSAFE driver's locks (netperf |> project). Are there new specific kernel config options to get better |> perfomance of network subsystem? Or should i set some sysctl variables? |> |> My hardware: |> - Motherboard: ASUS P5P43TD (with built in Gigabit LAN Atheros AR8121) |> - Core 2 Quad CPU |> - 4G RAM (2x2048) |> |> kernel compiled with PAE support, ULE-scheduler, with PREEMPTION option. |> If you need whole kernel config, please let me know, i will post it ASAP. |> |> |You need to check your network setups: |ifconfig -a | |You can really only have one NIC on a single network. With multiple NICs if |they are on the same network, you will have arp issues causing routing issues. |You can easily check the arp table before and after you see this behavior |doing: |arp -a |after a reboot, then after the system becomes unresponsive after 30-40 minutes. | |Multiple NICs are necessary if you are using this system as a firewall or |packet filter. | |To narrow down your problem you may want to disable any NICs that are not |necessary and see if the problem persists. | Thank you for reply, Derek! I have different non-overlapped subnets on used network interfaces. Actually, my machine acts as a border rather than just a router. And it needs several network interface cards (NICs) - one of them looks in my network (my Autonomous System with my internal routing), and another ones look to different ISPs with their own ASs. It gives possibility to make a choice of more cheap route to any Internet resource. By the way, when i tested just installed system under traffic load generated with iperf tool, the system worked fine during several days. Configuration was the same except only one NIC was under traffic load. And similar tests with each NIC installed in my machine yielded the same good results. Since it seems tied to load, which NIC is causing the trouble? I'd suspect the motherboard NIC. I have used many Intel NICs without problems. In multi-NIC servers I setup, I usually add a quad-port Intel card and don't use the motherboard NICs. You may want to try using a different NIC in place of the onboard and see if the problem persists. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8.0 retires into itself
At 04:28 AM 12/3/2009, Igor V. Ruzanov wrote: Hello! I have updated FreeBSD 8.0 sources via cvsup and compiled system. uname -a shows: FreeBSD localhost 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #2: Mon Nov 30 20:15:12 MSD 2009 r...@localhost:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HOME-PAE i386 Machine has 3 physical interfaces: - em0 (PCI/Intel PWLA 8390 MT) - em1 (PCI/Intel PWLA 8390 MT) - fxp0 (PCI/Intel EtherExpress PRO/100) and 2 VLANs: vlan317 and vlan320. Also there is one interface built in motherboard: - ale0 (PCI-E/Atheros AR8121) One physical interface (em0) is in trunk mode (802.1Q) to configure these two VLANs (vlan317 and vlan320) interfaces. Machine acts as BGP router. It has 3 uplinks: - vlan317 - vlan320 - fxp0 and one backbone interface: - em1. Next, i recompiled all userland and made all necessary configurations after which the machine became as production BGP router installed in server room. So issue looks like the following: After 20-30 minutes of stable work, the system starts to "retire into itself": any user processes (bgpd, zebra, named) don't respond, For example a can't telnet to bgpd control terminal, telnet just dies showing: Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]' I even tried to login into system from local console. But when i pressed Enter after username was typed, the console just hang. Power button also doesn't respond (in usual case pressing on Power button gives the machine is going to power off). One interesting thing: after system was booted, top command shows: system eats about 28-30% of CPU time interrupts eat about only 6-7% of CPU time all user processes eat less than 0-1% of CPU time On another working machine (same BGP router, but system is FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE p4) the picture seems to be different: system etas 9-10% of CPU time interrupts eat 15-16% of CPU time So my question is the REASONS that cause such system behavior. I read UPDATING, so kernel in FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE was largely reworked, in particular - SMPng in order to remove all non-MPSAFE driver's locks (netperf project). Are there new specific kernel config options to get better perfomance of network subsystem? Or should i set some sysctl variables? My hardware: - Motherboard: ASUS P5P43TD (with built in Gigabit LAN Atheros AR8121) - Core 2 Quad CPU - 4G RAM (2x2048) kernel compiled with PAE support, ULE-scheduler, with PREEMPTION option. If you need whole kernel config, please let me know, i will post it ASAP. Thanks in advance! +---+ ! CANMOS ISP Network! +---+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: ig...@canmos.ru ! +---+ You need to check your network setups: ifconfig -a You can really only have one NIC on a single network. With multiple NICs if they are on the same network, you will have arp issues causing routing issues. You can easily check the arp table before and after you see this behavior doing: arp -a after a reboot, then after the system becomes unresponsive after 30-40 minutes. Multiple NICs are necessary if you are using this system as a firewall or packet filter. To narrow down your problem you may want to disable any NICs that are not necessary and see if the problem persists. Hope this helps. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: how to remove HAL dependencies in gnome2
At 02:01 PM 12/1/2009, Mark Kane wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009, at 12:41:07 -0600, Derek Ragona wrote: > I source upgraded a server from 7.2 release to 8.0 release. In > trying to rebuild all the ports, HAL is broken and won't compile. If > I try to make config on most of those ports there is no HAL in the > config. How do I get rid of these dependencies so I can get the last > of the ports rebuilt? These ports all seem to be part of gnome2. Hi. I'm not sure why it wasn't more clearly announced as being required for the 8.0 upgrade specifically, however following the 20090309 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING (mainly removing the libusb port) should allow HAL to build again. Hope that helps, -Mark Thanks Mark for pointing this out. I had read UPDATING and missed this reference. I even searched through UPDATING for hal and hald references. I'm glad it was something simple, as I have all the ports updated now. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
how to remove HAL dependencies in gnome2
I source upgraded a server from 7.2 release to 8.0 release. In trying to rebuild all the ports, HAL is broken and won't compile. If I try to make config on most of those ports there is no HAL in the config. How do I get rid of these dependencies so I can get the last of the ports rebuilt? These ports all seem to be part of gnome2. -Derek derek at computinginnovations.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: What does one call name server registration?
At 04:52 AM 7/15/2009, Michael David Crawford wrote: Hi, I'm having a problem making myself clear to my domain name registrar's tech support. I have set up djbdns on a couple of my own servers, and want them registered AS name servers with whoever handles such registration. Most registrars allow one to just enter their hostnames and IPs and they take care of it automagically. But my once-beloved registrar HJ Linnen just outsourced all their registration services to NameScout, and they haven't got a clue. When I looked into it in my account page at NameScout, they said to email tech support, so I did. And tech support replied with the end-user instructions for assigning name servers to the domains one has registered with them. That's not what I want. What I have are two pairs in the following format: 1.2.3.4 a.ns.example.com 5.6.7.8 b.ns.example.com I would like a domain to be able to set its name servers to be a.ns.example.com and b.ns.example.com, and then when that domain is resolved the lookup is delegated to either 1.2.3.4 or 5.6.7.8. What is the process called, of registering such name servers? If I can tell NameScout support to do that for me, possibly they can get themselves a clue on my behalf. Thanks! Mike -- Michael David Crawford m...@prgmr.com prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You Are Stupid. Xen-Powered Virtual Private Servers: http://prgmr.com/xen Nameservers are designated PER domain. You tell the registrar for a particular domain that your authoritative nameservers are at whatever fully qualified domain name and IP address. Prior to doing this with your registrar you should have the domain zone file properly setup on those nameservers. Hope this helps. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD on VMware ESXi
At 05:44 AM 5/6/2009, Daniels Vanags wrote: We moved Hard Disk Drives from HP ProLiant DL 385 G2 with 4GB RAM, AMD Opteron processor to HP ProLiant DL 380 G5, 4GB RAM, Intel Xeon processor. Disks contain FreeBSD Virtual Machines running in VMware ESXi Server. When trying to boot, getting error: BTX halted. Please explain, how to start FreeBSD on different hardware. Thanks, Daniel Vanags Information Technology Department IT infrastructure system engineer I'm not sure what exactly you've done from your posting above. I have FreeBSD running in VM's under ESXi. I have moved the FreeBSD VM's from physical server to server without much trouble. The devices presented to the FreeBSD VM are dependent the VM configuration, so I would check there first. You may have selected a different SCSI host adapter in the VM settings for instance. I believe the problem you are experiencing is more to do with your ESXi/VM configuration than FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: isc-dhcpd server, HOSTNAME
At 09:42 AM 5/7/2009, Pieter Donche wrote: FreeBSD7 with isc-dhcp30-server. It hands out an IP address, OK, but the BASH environment variable HOSTNAME is not set. Why? (A DNS server is active on the network and can succesfully be queried from a FreeBSD bash command (nslookup or host) to see the hostname associated with the IP-address) I have a later version of dhcpd running on FreeBSD without problems. If your DHCP scope is setup correctly and your DHCP clients are getting settings that work, I'm not sure what is the problem you are experiencing. You hostname variable can be set in the startup bash (or any other shell's startup scripts) scripts on login. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Snapshots
At 04:00 AM 5/5/2009, Johan Hendriks wrote: Are there no more snapshots of current? The last is from 02-2009 Regards, Johan I downloaded one from this month a couple days ago. You should see a May snapshot available. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
cannot get FreeBSD 7.X to load on HP z400
I cannot get FreeBSD 7.X to load on an HP z400. I have tried 7.1 i386 release, 7.1 amd64 release, 7.2 amd64 RC2, 8.0 amd64 current. In all versions the loader stops just after the message: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/md0 I have tried to simplify the setup of this unit to a single SATA drive, and a single SATA CD/DVD drive. I have tried various BIOS settings, turning on and off cores in the CPU, changing other IO setting, but still the install hangs. The z400 has the IntelĀ® X58 Express chipset and a 4 core W3520 Xeon CPU. This particular unit has 4GB RAM. If I can get the amd64 version to load on it, I'd like to run it with more RAM. But obviously the first hurdle is getting the OS to boot to sysinstall. Any help would be appreciated. -Derek derek at computinginnovations.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Freebsd Built-in vacation program does not auto reply
At 08:16 PM 4/19/2009, lyd mc wrote: Hi derek, Correction on step 4, it should be: \alydio.mc, "|/usr/bin/vacation alydio.mc" thanks, alyd --- On Mon, 4/20/09, lyd mc wrote: From: lyd mc Subject: Re: Freebsd Built-in vacation program does not auto reply To: "Derek Ragona" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 9:07 AM hi derek, It is not also working on my sendmail. May be I overlooked some steps? step 1. login to user # su alydio.mc step 2. initialize vacation db $ vacation -i step 3. create .vacation.msg From: alydio...@mydomain.com Subject: I am on vacation Delivered-By-The-Graces-Of: The Vacation program Precedence: bulk I am on vacation until... step 4. create .forward \klyren, "|/usr/bin/vacation klyren" sendmail log Apr 20 08:21:08 MAIL sm-mta[18102]: n3K0L2Jl018092: to="|/usr/bin/vacation alydio.mc", ctladdr= (1001/0), delay=00:00:05, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=62458, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent ...nothing follows... thanks alydiomc In the log entry above, I see: ctladdr= I suspect this is NOT a deliverable address but that depends on how you have mydomain resolving. Also you might want to try using a user account without a period in the name. The period may be causing a silent parsing problem for sendmail and vacation. -Derek --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Derek Ragona wrote: From: Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Freebsd Built-in vacation program does not auto reply To: alydi...@yahoo.com, "Odhiambo Washington" Cc: "Steve Bertrand" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 9:51 PM At 07:27 AM 4/17/2009, lyd mc wrote: Thanks Odhiambo for your time. Actually i have a working vacation program from freebsd ports (/usr/ports/mail/vacation). I only wondering why the freebsd base vacation behave differently I still want freebsd base vacation... the one from ports is obsolete (as per its maintainer website) and sometime i need to edit its makefile for it to compile Thanks again. I think the base system vacation is the one that is part of sendmail. So using it with postfix as the MTA may be the issue. I have use the base vacation version flawlessly with sendmail. -Derek --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Odhiambo Washington wrote: From: Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: Freebsd Built-in vacation program does not auto reply To: alydi...@yahoo.com Cc: "Steve Bertrand" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 8:10 PM On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, lyd mc wrote: hi, I don't know how to run it in debug mode I already try this one. #/usr/bin/vacation -d alydio.mc but nothing happened... no logs in /var/log/message and /var/log/maillog pertaining to vacation. Okay. I think you need to look again at your MTA logs. Not being an expert with Postfix, I am not sure I can help with it anyway. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." -- Mark Twain ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Freebsd Built-in vacation program does not auto reply
At 07:27 AM 4/17/2009, lyd mc wrote: Thanks Odhiambo for your time. Actually i have a working vacation program from freebsd ports (/usr/ports/mail/vacation). I only wondering why the freebsd base vacation behave differently I still want freebsd base vacation... the one from ports is obsolete (as per its maintainer website) and sometime i need to edit its makefile for it to compile Thanks again. I think the base system vacation is the one that is part of sendmail. So using it with postfix as the MTA may be the issue. I have use the base vacation version flawlessly with sendmail. -Derek --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Odhiambo Washington wrote: From: Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: Freebsd Built-in vacation program does not auto reply To: alydi...@yahoo.com Cc: "Steve Bertrand" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 8:10 PM On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, lyd mc wrote: hi, I don't know how to run it in debug mode I already try this one. #/usr/bin/vacation -d alydio.mc but nothing happened... no logs in /var/log/message and /var/log/maillog pertaining to vacation. Okay. I think you need to look again at your MTA logs. Not being an expert with Postfix, I am not sure I can help with it anyway. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." -- Mark Twain ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: MailScanner & sendmail
At 03:15 PM 4/15/2009, Bob Willcox wrote: I asked this question in freebsd-ports (in a different way as I thought maybe I could clarify the situation some by rewording it) the other day and didn't receive any reply so I thought I try here this time. I have a 7.2-prelease system that I am trying to get sendmail and MailScanner running on and for some reason sendmail isn't listening on *.smtp, though it is listening on localhost.smtp. If I remove MailScanner from the mix and run sendmail in the conventional way (with sendmail_enable="YES" specified in /etc/rc.conf) then things work as expected (except no MailScanner, of course). I currently have a running 6.4-stable system that this new 7.2 system is scheduled to replace that is using the same MailScanner and sendmail configuration files and it is working ok (and has been for a long time). I suspect that I'm simply missing some configuration option here that I've overlooked or that may have changed between 6.4 and 7.2, but don't really know where to look. Any help or tips on things to do/check would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox The trouble with doing something right the first b...@immure.com time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was. Austin, TX -- unknown Bob, I have sendmail with mailscanner running on 7.1 release with no problems. Do you have: mta_type="sendmail" mailscanner_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf? I also have: spamd_enable="YES" in my /etc/rc.conf -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Advise on PCIX dual network card
At 03:28 AM 3/16/2009, Olivier Nicole wrote: Hi, I need to buy a PCI eXtended dual network card, any advise on what brand is supported and work reliabily? TIA, Olivier I use the intel PCI-X cards with multiple OS's. They have 2 and 4 port versions. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Odd problem with DNS and IP change.
At 09:40 AM 2/28/2009, Andrei Brezan wrote: Hello list, I have a strange problem and I don't know what to relate it to. My ISP changed my IP from (eg) 10.1.1.1 to 15.1.1.1. I have changed my zone files to reflect that change. "dig -t mx domain.com" results in mail.domain.com 3600 IN A 15.1.1.1 (the new ip). However when i try: "ping mail.domain.com" it tries to get to 10.1.1.1 the old ip and gets time to live exceeded fro an ip along the route. When i try to ping domain.com it gets all ok as it pings the new ip. I've also tried dig @(forwarders in named.conf) and they to got the correct mx dns entry for domain.com. In rc.conf i have hostname="mail.domain.com" (eg), i haven't changed it, i'm thinking it's something related to hostid or hostuid but i don't know where to search for this topic. If anyone has a clue what to try or where to look upon this behavior please shed some light. Thank you. Check /etc/hosts which is used before DNS. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: two ethernet cards
At 06:21 PM 1/2/2009, Stefan Miklosovic wrote: hi i have two ethernet cards on my box uname -a FreeBSD dexter 7.0-RELEASE Freebsd 7.0-RELEASE #5: Fri Jan 2 21:25:21 CET 2009 r...@dexter:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEXTER i386 ifconfig rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX inet 192.168.0.177 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet 100baseTX status: active sk0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=b ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX inet 192.168.0.176 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet 100baseTX (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 when I want to ping sk0 from eth0 on linux box, ping is ok, but this message appears to me in freebsd console Jan 3 01:07:39 dexter kernel: arp: 192.168.0.2 is on rl0 but got reply from XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX on sk0 linux command ping -I eth0 192.168.0.176 linux ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX inet addr:192.168.0.2 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::20a:e4ff:fef3:abb6/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:88 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:180 (180.0 B) TX bytes:11542 (11.2 KB) Interrupt:22 Base address:0x3000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:416 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:416 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:25130 (24.5 KB) TX bytes:25130 (24.5 KB) wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX inet addr:192.168.0.173 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::214:a4ff:fe79:3cbc/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:30030 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:25399 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:32882410 (31.3 MB) TX bytes:3522346 (3.3 MB) mac adres from eth0 on linux machine is same as from the error output on bsd thank you a lot stewe With two NIC's in the same system they need to be on separate and discrete subnets. If these are put into a dumb switch, you will still get arp errors. You need to connect each NIC to a separate network or VLAN. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: strange fsck results
At 06:08 AM 12/28/2008, re...@adeptscience.com wrote: I am running VMware Server 2.0 but see the same results with VMware Server 1.0. The virtual machines are copies that I made by transferring the vmware files for it from another server. As far as I know it did not have any fsck problems on that machine but I don't have access to it any more. I have noticed that there are a lot of failures (corrupted files) when moving VMware appliances with the use of USB memory sticks so I do test them right on the memory stick before I disconnect from the PC. All the host OSs are Windows XP Professional using IDE ATA drives, current hardware is an HP dx2450 AMD Phenom. but I saw the same errors on an Acer. The files systems are: # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass# /dev/ad0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1e /usrufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad0s1d /varufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 Here is a bit from fsck of /var hueysan_vm: {10} fsck /var ** /dev/ad0s1d (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=190413 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=235 MTIME=Dec 27 12:23 2008 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no ... I get about a dozen similar UNREF errors. I am only worried about the errors if they might cause a problem with the use of the virtual server as a development server. I have installed and have running apache, mysql, sendmail, samba, rsync, etc and they all seem to work fine. I am planning on distributing copies of the virtual server to some others who are working on a project with me so I really only need to be fairly sure that no hidden gotchas are going to plague our efforts. Having the virtual server setup is a BIG plus when collaborating with people who only have Windows PCs, before I had a central FreeBSD server for testing etc but that is so much slower then have a local development server. Being able to just send off a memory stick with the VMserver and instructions is fantastic. Thanks to all, Charlie Reese Charlie, I have a number of FreeBSD servers 7.0 running under ESX server 3.5. With FreeBSD 7, it has the background fsck. I checked my servers and did see one with an issue from fsck, but later the background fsck had it fixed. The only issue I've had running the i386 version of FreeBSD, and other OS's under ESX is to be sure to use the vmware tools to copy the VM's once they are properly powered off. You might want to try upgrading one of your VM FreeBSD servers to 7.0 and see if the issue persists. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: strange fsck results
At 12:37 PM 12/26/2008, re...@adeptscience.com wrote: I am running FreeBSD 6.3 as a VMware virtual server and am getting some strange results when I run fsck. When I run it in multi-user mode I get quite a few UNREF FILE errors but when I switch to single user mode fsck does not find any errors. Is this something I need to worry about and if it is how might I try to get fsck to repair them? TIA Charlie Reese You need to give a bit more information: Are you running your VM under esx server or workstation? What is your filesystem layout under freebsd. What is the underlying server and disks you are running vmware on? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: install freebsd from inside another operating system
At 08:17 AM 12/8/2008, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: Robin Becker schrieb: > I'm just wondering if it is possible to install FreeBSD from inside a > bootstrap operating system such as a knoppix or ubuntu preinstall? > > Reason I'm asking is that my boss is asking about getting another > commodity server using a provider that doesn't offer freebsd. We do get > KVM over IP however, and I assume that really clever people might know > how to handle this sort of thing if they have console access. Only KVM or do you have access to a Remote console (IPMI). You can try to boot FreeBSD from a Network but than you need access to the Network from a running server to setup a TFTP and BOOTP Server. Much more easy would it be just to let the Computer Center guys insert a FreeBSD CD into the CD Drive. Thats how I install FreeBSD in remote Computer Centers. It Might work I you generate a Harddiskimage and use your Bootstrap OS to get it from net and write it to the Harddisk at the server. I never done this but theoretically it should work. As I said, the best way to du the install is to have a CD inserted and after install simply change the bootsequence in BIOS. Regards Estartu -- Another option is install FreeBSD under VMWare ESX server. The ESX server is now free. Loading FreeBSD is straightforward using the ISO cdrom. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: what script is whacking root's files
At 11:33 AM 12/4/2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:30:13 -0600, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /root is on /dev/da0s1a > > This particular server is running in a VM on a vmware esx 3.5 server. > The server runs fine, but every so often the dot files disappear for > root. I have not found the behavior to follow a reboot, but some period > of time. Hence my suspicions it was a periodic script. Check your crontab jobs then. * Do you have any local changes to the system crontab in `/etc/crontab'? If yes, what are those changes, and what do the scripts or other commands they run look like? * Do you have a user-specific crontab file for `root' in `/var/cron/tabs/root'? If yes what does it contain? ___ Thank you to everyone who made great suggestions. I found the errant script, and it was running out of a cron entry to clean up old mailscanner files. It seems if the directories in the script didn't all exist, and a cd failed, it left the script running in /root. I have since corrected the script to test for the directories existence first. But this was a case of "can't see the forest for the trees" and I do appreciate all the help and suggestions. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: what script is whacking root's files
At 01:11 AM 12/4/2008, Tim Judd wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Derek Ragona wrote: > >> I have a freshly installed 7.0 release server. The configuration files >> (all dot files including .ssh etc.) in /root keep getting deleted. I >> assume this is from a script running from periodic and can be set NOT to >> delete these files. Can someone point me where I need to make this change. >> I have already combed through the handbook and mailing list archives. >> > > There is no such standard script in FreeBSD. > > Kris > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > I'd make sure there's not something like a tmpfs/mfs filesystem that /root is being used on. If / is on a ramdisk image of any kind, on each reboot, it should disappear. Perhaps you should paste your fstab and current mounted filesystems as an aid to debug. I didn't think it would be from the way the filesystems are mounted, so here's that information: cat /etc/fstab # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass# /dev/da0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1d /usrufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 mount /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/da0s1d on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) /root is on /dev/da0s1a This particular server is running in a VM on a vmware esx 3.5 server. The server runs fine, but every so often the dot files disappear for root. I have not found the behavior to follow a reboot, but some period of time. Hence my suspicions it was a periodic script. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
what script is whacking root's files
I have a freshly installed 7.0 release server. The configuration files (all dot files including .ssh etc.) in /root keep getting deleted. I assume this is from a script running from periodic and can be set NOT to delete these files. Can someone point me where I need to make this change. I have already combed through the handbook and mailing list archives. Thanks, -Derek derek at computinginnovations.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: smbfs 2 GB file size limit
At 09:21 AM 11/20/2008, David Horn wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:50 PM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Derek Ragona > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 12:23 AM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Derek Ragona >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I have FreeBSD 7.0 Release and if I mount_smbfs a network NTFS share I >>> have >>> a 2 GB size limit on files. I checked the handbook and list archives but >>> have not found a solution. >> >> I just ran a quick test, and was not able to reproduce this issue with >> the mount_smbfs from FreeBSD 7.0. I tried against a Windows 2003 >> Server SP2, Windows XP SP3, and Samba 3.0 {on FreeBSD 7} with a 3.5GB >> file. >> >> Was your issue with reading from or writing to a SMB share ? >> >> It was writing to a smb share. >> >> >> What is the server software and OS version ? >> (if Microsoft Windows, please include Service Pack number as well, as >> it might make a difference) >> >> Windows 2003 server 32bit. >> >> How much disk space is left on your server volume ? >> >> Over a terabyte free >> >> Are there disk quotas enabled on the server ? >> >> None >> >> What error message are you getting from your FreeBSD client (if any) ? >> >> No error message, it just stopped writing at 1 Gb. I was doing this using >> scp. > > Whoa, hopefully you just made a few typos here, or we are going down > the wrong path of investigation. > > Did you really mean to say scp or cp ? > scp(1) - secure copy (remote file copy program) > cp(1)- copy files > > If you really meant scp, then the problem is not mount_smbfs, but > instead likely a buggy scp client or server (which does not use smb > for transport, but ssh) > > What is the exact byte count that your write stops at ? You > originally stated 2GB, then 1GB. > >> >> Can you check the smb server logs and see if you are getting any error >> messages there ? >> >> Well I'm just mounting the volume to FreeBSD from the Windows server so >> not >> sure I'll find much in the logs besides the system log, but I will look. >> >> You may want to get a Wireshark trace and see if you can capture the >> SMB error message/error code. >> >> I have heard of people running into similar problems when running >> against older server software (NT 4.0/old samba) when the SMB session >> did not negotiate large file/large write support (a function of the >> SMB server capabilities session negotiation) >> >> I saw posts to that effect and that you needed samba 3.x to support large >> files sizes, and the lfs option. But the mount_smbfs doesn't offer any >> large file option. >> > > Only bother with this next bit if you are morbidly curious as to how > things work rather than just want to solve your problem, as it gets > into the nitty gritty details of smb: > > mount_smbfs will allow for lfs (CAP_LARGE_FILE) automatically by > specifying it's dialect capabilities in the smb negotiation. > > If you umount your smb share, then start a tcpdump you can capture the > smb negotiation "Capabilities" bitmask to see if CAP_LARGE_FILE is > being negotiated - the server specifies this capability. The client > just sends the dialects of smb supported.For example: > > tcpdump -vvv -s 1500 -i em0 host server.example.com | grep Capabilities > > { where em0 is the network interface in use on FreeBSD and > server.example.com is the hostname/ip address of your smb server } > > Then do a mount of the smb share (while tcpdump is running) and you > should capture the Capabilities negotiated. > > For example: > > Capabilities=0x1F3FD > > If you decode the bitmask by using this reference : > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302230.aspx {hint: only > look at the last four bytes of the Capabilities line (e.g. F3FD in my > example)} Or if you have kernel source installed, you can look in > /usr/src/sys/netsmb/smb.h for the details. > >- Capabilities: 0x0001F3FD > RawMode:(...1) Supports > SMB_COM_READ_RAW and SMB_COM_WRITE_RAW (CAP_RAW_MODE) > MpxMode:(..0.) No > Support for SMB_COM_READ_MPX or SMB_COM_WRITE_MPX (CAP_MPX_MODE) > Unicode:(.1..) Supports > Unicode Strings (CAP_UNICODE) &
Re: Kernel SMB performance
At 09:08 AM 11/21/2008, Ansar Mohammed wrote: Hello all We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB module? You may want to use FreeNAS which is made for NAS using FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD in VMWare box
At 06:57 AM 11/22/2008, Pieter Donche wrote: If one installs FreeBSD 7.0 in a VMWare box, the answer/choicde for 'install boot manager' is this: Standard MBR ? The PC with WMware is connect to internet. Should one configure Ethernet then. If yes, what static IP parameters must one enter?? You need to be more specific. Are you using ESX server or workstation? As for the boot manager you can use it, or not. Both work. You can have the FreeBSD just use DHCP to get network settings. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: smbfs 2 GB file size limit
At 02:05 PM 11/20/2008, Chris Pratt wrote: On Nov 20, 2008, at 7:21 AM, David Horn wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Derek Ragona No error message, it just stopped writing at 1 Gb. I was doing this using scp. Whoa, hopefully you just made a few typos here, or we are going down the wrong path of investigation. Did you really mean to say scp or cp ? scp(1) - secure copy (remote file copy program) cp(1)- copy files ... What ssh version is running on both of these "other" systems ? What OS are both of these other systems ? So it looks to me like there is some issue with the scp that is within FreeBSD i386 7. As per my previous message, I still suggest running single variable tests to make sure that you know what is causing the failure, but if you just want to jump to a possible solution, you can try updating ssh to the latest in the ports tree (5.0p1). If you have the FreeBSD ports collection installed and updated using portsnap(8) or csup(1) , just do: cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable make install Otherwise, install / update your ports collection using portsnap(8) (fetch update or fetch extract) first, then install openssh-portable. Good Luck. ---Dave I apologize in advance if this has nothing to do with this. I'd ignored this thread completely since it had "SMB" in the subject. Today I noticed the comments shown above that it was apparently actually related to ssh (scp). The fired a synapse of a recent session failure I was having after updating a server to 7.0 that normally accrues about a gig of changes a day. My backup server was running 5.5 and rsyncing the diffs each day. After the upgrade of the application server, the 5.5 client began to hang it's rsync session every day. I updated the 5.5 server to 7.0 (which OBTW replaced the ssh suite) and the problem disappeared. I didn't see in the thread what the actual ssh client OS or rev was but perhaps the client is downrev and there is an issue there. I did no research to figure out why, having my backup server so far downrevved made it's upgrade my first potshot and it worked. Chris, Thanks for the additional input. I am going to try updating openssh from the ports as this appears to be an issue with scp. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: smbfs 2 GB file size limit
At 12:50 PM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:23 AM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Derek Ragona > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have FreeBSD 7.0 Release and if I mount_smbfs a network NTFS share I >> have >> a 2 GB size limit on files. I checked the handbook and list archives but >> have not found a solution. > > I just ran a quick test, and was not able to reproduce this issue with > the mount_smbfs from FreeBSD 7.0. I tried against a Windows 2003 > Server SP2, Windows XP SP3, and Samba 3.0 {on FreeBSD 7} with a 3.5GB > file. > > Was your issue with reading from or writing to a SMB share ? > > It was writing to a smb share. > > > What is the server software and OS version ? > (if Microsoft Windows, please include Service Pack number as well, as > it might make a difference) > > Windows 2003 server 32bit. > > How much disk space is left on your server volume ? > > Over a terabyte free > > Are there disk quotas enabled on the server ? > > None > > What error message are you getting from your FreeBSD client (if any) ? > > No error message, it just stopped writing at 1 Gb. I was doing this using > scp. Whoa, hopefully you just made a few typos here, or we are going down the wrong path of investigation. Did you really mean to say scp or cp ? scp(1) - secure copy (remote file copy program) cp(1)- copy files If you really meant scp, then the problem is not mount_smbfs, but instead likely a buggy scp client or server (which does not use smb for transport, but ssh) What is the exact byte count that your write stops at ? You originally stated 2GB, then 1GB. > > Can you check the smb server logs and see if you are getting any error > messages there ? > > Well I'm just mounting the volume to FreeBSD from the Windows server so not > sure I'll find much in the logs besides the system log, but I will look. > > You may want to get a Wireshark trace and see if you can capture the > SMB error message/error code. > > I have heard of people running into similar problems when running > against older server software (NT 4.0/old samba) when the SMB session > did not negotiate large file/large write support (a function of the > SMB server capabilities session negotiation) > > I saw posts to that effect and that you needed samba 3.x to support large > files sizes, and the lfs option. But the mount_smbfs doesn't offer any > large file option. > Only bother with this next bit if you are morbidly curious as to how things work rather than just want to solve your problem, as it gets into the nitty gritty details of smb: mount_smbfs will allow for lfs (CAP_LARGE_FILE) automatically by specifying it's dialect capabilities in the smb negotiation. If you umount your smb share, then start a tcpdump you can capture the smb negotiation "Capabilities" bitmask to see if CAP_LARGE_FILE is being negotiated - the server specifies this capability. The client just sends the dialects of smb supported.For example: tcpdump -vvv -s 1500 -i em0 host server.example.com | grep Capabilities { where em0 is the network interface in use on FreeBSD and server.example.com is the hostname/ip address of your smb server } Then do a mount of the smb share (while tcpdump is running) and you should capture the Capabilities negotiated. For example: Capabilities=0x1F3FD If you decode the bitmask by using this reference : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302230.aspx {hint: only look at the last four bytes of the Capabilities line (e.g. F3FD in my example)} Or if you have kernel source installed, you can look in /usr/src/sys/netsmb/smb.h for the details. - Capabilities: 0x0001F3FD RawMode:(...1) Supports SMB_COM_READ_RAW and SMB_COM_WRITE_RAW (CAP_RAW_MODE) MpxMode:(..0.) No Support for SMB_COM_READ_MPX or SMB_COM_WRITE_MPX (CAP_MPX_MODE) Unicode:(.1..) Supports Unicode Strings (CAP_UNICODE) LargeFiles: (1...) Supports large files with 64-bit offsets (CAP_LARGE_FILES) NTSMBs: (...1) Supports SMB NTLM 0.12 dialect commands (implies CAP_NT_FIND) (CAP_NT_SMBS) RPCRemoteAPIs: (..1.) Supports remote API requests using RPC over named pipe connections (CAP_RPC_REMOTE_APIS) NTStatus: (.1..) Can respond with 32-bit NT status codes in Status (CAP_NT_STATUS) LevelIIOplocks: (1...) Supports Level II oplocks ( CAP_LEVEL_
Re: smbfs 2 GB file size limit
At 12:50 PM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:23 AM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Derek Ragona > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have FreeBSD 7.0 Release and if I mount_smbfs a network NTFS share I >> have >> a 2 GB size limit on files. I checked the handbook and list archives but >> have not found a solution. > > I just ran a quick test, and was not able to reproduce this issue with > the mount_smbfs from FreeBSD 7.0. I tried against a Windows 2003 > Server SP2, Windows XP SP3, and Samba 3.0 {on FreeBSD 7} with a 3.5GB > file. > > Was your issue with reading from or writing to a SMB share ? > > It was writing to a smb share. > > > What is the server software and OS version ? > (if Microsoft Windows, please include Service Pack number as well, as > it might make a difference) > > Windows 2003 server 32bit. > > How much disk space is left on your server volume ? > > Over a terabyte free > > Are there disk quotas enabled on the server ? > > None > > What error message are you getting from your FreeBSD client (if any) ? > > No error message, it just stopped writing at 1 Gb. I was doing this using > scp. Whoa, hopefully you just made a few typos here, or we are going down the wrong path of investigation. Did you really mean to say scp or cp ? scp(1) - secure copy (remote file copy program) cp(1)- copy files If you really meant scp, then the problem is not mount_smbfs, but instead likely a buggy scp client or server (which does not use smb for transport, but ssh) What is the exact byte count that your write stops at ? You originally stated 2GB, then 1GB. This problem occurs under the following scenario: I have a windows share mounted on a FreeBSD 7.0 release (i386) using mount_smbfs. I was trying to scp from another server on the LAN to this share a 30GB file. The scp only copied 2 GB of that 30 GB file. This was using the scp on FreeBSD 7.0. I will try another scp application to determine if it is the scp, or mount_smbfs. I know the server I was coping from via SCP is not an issue. I was able to transfer that 30 GB file from that source server to another *nix server on the LAN. > > Can you check the smb server logs and see if you are getting any error > messages there ? > > Well I'm just mounting the volume to FreeBSD from the Windows server so not > sure I'll find much in the logs besides the system log, but I will look. > > You may want to get a Wireshark trace and see if you can capture the > SMB error message/error code. > > I have heard of people running into similar problems when running > against older server software (NT 4.0/old samba) when the SMB session > did not negotiate large file/large write support (a function of the > SMB server capabilities session negotiation) > > I saw posts to that effect and that you needed samba 3.x to support large > files sizes, and the lfs option. But the mount_smbfs doesn't offer any > large file option. > Only bother with this next bit if you are morbidly curious as to how things work rather than just want to solve your problem, as it gets into the nitty gritty details of smb: mount_smbfs will allow for lfs (CAP_LARGE_FILE) automatically by specifying it's dialect capabilities in the smb negotiation. If you umount your smb share, then start a tcpdump you can capture the smb negotiation "Capabilities" bitmask to see if CAP_LARGE_FILE is being negotiated - the server specifies this capability. The client just sends the dialects of smb supported.For example: tcpdump -vvv -s 1500 -i em0 host server.example.com | grep Capabilities { where em0 is the network interface in use on FreeBSD and server.example.com is the hostname/ip address of your smb server } Then do a mount of the smb share (while tcpdump is running) and you should capture the Capabilities negotiated. For example: Capabilities=0x1F3FD If you decode the bitmask by using this reference : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302230.aspx {hint: only look at the last four bytes of the Capabilities line (e.g. F3FD in my example)} Or if you have kernel source installed, you can look in /usr/src/sys/netsmb/smb.h for the details. - Capabilities: 0x0001F3FD RawMode:(...1) Supports SMB_COM_READ_RAW and SMB_COM_WRITE_RAW (CAP_RAW_MODE) MpxMode:(..0.) No Support for SMB_COM_READ_MPX or SMB_COM_WRITE_MPX (CAP_MPX_MODE) Unicode:(.1..) Supports Unicode Strings (CAP_UNICODE) LargeFiles: (...
Re: smbfs 2 GB file size limit
At 12:23 AM 11/18/2008, David Horn wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have FreeBSD 7.0 Release and if I mount_smbfs a network NTFS share I have > a 2 GB size limit on files. I checked the handbook and list archives but > have not found a solution. I just ran a quick test, and was not able to reproduce this issue with the mount_smbfs from FreeBSD 7.0. I tried against a Windows 2003 Server SP2, Windows XP SP3, and Samba 3.0 {on FreeBSD 7} with a 3.5GB file. Was your issue with reading from or writing to a SMB share ? It was writing to a smb share. What is the server software and OS version ? (if Microsoft Windows, please include Service Pack number as well, as it might make a difference) Windows 2003 server 32bit. How much disk space is left on your server volume ? Over a terabyte free Are there disk quotas enabled on the server ? None What error message are you getting from your FreeBSD client (if any) ? No error message, it just stopped writing at 1 Gb. I was doing this using scp. Can you check the smb server logs and see if you are getting any error messages there ? Well I'm just mounting the volume to FreeBSD from the Windows server so not sure I'll find much in the logs besides the system log, but I will look. You may want to get a Wireshark trace and see if you can capture the SMB error message/error code. I have heard of people running into similar problems when running against older server software (NT 4.0/old samba) when the SMB session did not negotiate large file/large write support (a function of the SMB server capabilities session negotiation) I saw posts to that effect and that you needed samba 3.x to support large files sizes, and the lfs option. But the mount_smbfs doesn't offer any large file option. > Supposedly there is an smbmount as part of the > standard samba, but that doesn't seem to install from any of the samba > ports. smbmount is not included in the FreeBSD port of samba, as it is Linux kernel specific. mount_smbfs(8) is the correct userland app. You could always try the samba smbclient(1) to access SMB shares using an FTP-like environment. I saw that as an option. I may try that to test this issue. > > Any help would be appreciated. Sorry I do not have a good solution for you. Perhaps someone else will give you better advice. Thanks for the help! -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
smbfs 2 GB file size limit
I have FreeBSD 7.0 Release and if I mount_smbfs a network NTFS share I have a 2 GB size limit on files. I checked the handbook and list archives but have not found a solution. Supposedly there is an smbmount as part of the standard samba, but that doesn't seem to install from any of the samba ports. Any help would be appreciated. -Derek derek at computinginnovations.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: High load - lost network
At 06:45 AM 11/10/2008, Christer Solskogen wrote: I have a server with a em interface. Whenever the server has a high load (compiling world for instance) the network connectivity is lost. dmesg tells me this: em0: link state changed to DOWN em0: link state changed to UP em0: link state changed to DOWN em0: link state changed to UP em0: link state changed to DOWN em0: link state changed to UP em0: link state changed to DOWN em0: link state changed to UP em0: link state changed to DOWN em0: link state changed to UP Do anyone have a tips for how to workaround this or is the server just junk? The server is running FreeBSD 7.0 (i386) with latest patches from freebsd-update. -- chs Check your switch and the wiring. I use em drivers and hardware without issues. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Shutting down help
At 02:48 PM 10/23/2008, Juan Ortega wrote: I'm using FreeBSD amd64 8-0-Current I set up window maker to start by "startx" command, but when I exit the window maker the screen just turns black nothing works so I'm force to unplug the power each time. This happens "sometimes" other times the terminal shows up and I can shutdown manually. Since I'm using a snapshot version of FreeBSD is this a bug? I'm not sure what logs to copy and paste here for more information. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Use: ctrl+alt+backspace to kill your x server. I suspect you have the wrong program starting in your startx. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Apache aliased directory invisible
At 10:16 PM 10/20/2008, David Karapetyan wrote: FreeBSD office19.resnet.nd.edu 7.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Wed Oct 1 10:10:12 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Hello all. I would like to make aliased directories in apache visible from the directory root. An example: When I visit http://myserver.com/, I would like to see the 'icons' folder (suppose that in my document root I have directories 'bobo' and 'gogo', but that /icons is actually an alias for /usr/local/share/icons). Bobo and gogo show up in the directoroy listing when I access http://myserver.com, but not /icons. How can I remedy this? add a symbolic link: ln -s /usr/local/share/icons [path to your doc root]/icons typically for apache22 this would be: ln -s /usr/local/share/icons /usr/local/www/apache22/data/icons -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 7 and ESXi
At 10:54 PM 10/13/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm facing some problems trying to install a FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-amd64, on a Dell PE 2950III, dual Xeon Quad core, 8GB RAM. After (FBSD) boot menu count down, it shows a dump of the CPU registers and a message: BTX Halted. No matter what is changed in VM setup. It does not happen with i386 version. Which is the best release to install in this box? Should I go ahead with i386? Thank you, - Marcelo I have multiple VM's running the i386 version under ESXi. I think you need to examine what purpose you are running the FreeBSD VM, and then choose what version to run. The amd64 64-bit version can address more resources, but if you are not going to dedicate those resources in excess of 32-bit to the VM, you don't need to run the 64-bit version. Also there are a lot less ports in the 64-bit version. -Derek On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Todor Genov wrote: |I have ran FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0 in ESXi and haven't bumped into any |problems so far. | | When they say "supported" they are referring to service level |agreements and technical support should something go wrong, so if you |plan to use this in a production environment you need to do some prior |testing on your own. | |Regards, | |Todor Genov |Systems Operations | |Verizon Business South Africa (Pty) Ltd | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Tel: +27 11 235 6500 |Fax: 086 692 0543 | | | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |> HI all, |> |> I'm planning to virtualize a FreeBSD server on a Dell PowerEdge with |> embedded hipervisor VMware ESXi 3.5. |> Fbsd isn't listed as supported as guest OS for ESX(i), since version |> 4.x. |> Is there any report about problems or impossibility doing that? |> |> |> - Marcelo |> |> ___ |> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list |> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions |> To unsubscribe, send any mail to |> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" |___ |freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list |http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions |To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" | - Marcelo ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Multiple NICs routing question
At 06:26 AM 10/9/2008, Konrad Heuer wrote: Hello, I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets: NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network NIC3: local unrouted network NIC4: local unrouted network In the current configuration I use a default gateway (and no routing daemon) in the subnet addressed by NIC1. Now of course, if a client in an arbitrary different class c subnet contacts the server using the ip address of NIC2, it gets a reply from NIC1. How can I cange this? I'd like the server to answer via the interface the client uses when connecting. Maybe that's a silly question, but thanks for any reply! Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can have only one default gateway, that should be to where all other traffic should go. Add static routes to your specific subnets, public or private for the routing of that traffic. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Running cron jobs as nobody
At 10:11 AM 10/2/2008, DAve wrote: Good morning all, We have a cronjob we need to run as nobody from /etc/crontab and it seems to be not working. The job runs, but not as user nobody. I noticed two things, 1) the job to update the locate DB runs as nobody, because the script uses su to become nobody. echo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb | nice -5 su -fm nobody || rc=3 2) nobody, as expected, has no shell or home dir in /etc/password. I searched around for an answer but didn't see anything concerning this other than a patch to cron to check if setuid fails. Is setting the user to nobody in /etc/crontab not possible? Thanks, DAve I've done this two different ways: One is to use sudo and have your script su - to nobody. You will need to test your script first before trying it through cron. Create a cronjob for nobody using: crontab -e -u nobody Hope this helps. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PXE real life use
At 02:04 PM 10/1/2008, Chris Papageorgiou wrote: Dear Derek, First Id like to thank you for your reply. Yes I've read the handbook and lots of other technical articles on this particular subject, what concerns me is the overall 'worth' of this technique just to install OS's on customer's computers through PXE and not by the traditional way. Best Regards, Chris Chris, This is best used as a way to boot a client into an OS. You can then control the OS used for these clients, AND have just one place to worry about updates. It also gives you control on what applications you make available to the users. While you can use PXE,, bootp, or tftp to provide a boot and then load an OS to a local drive, that is usually more trouble than it is worth. -Derek Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 03:03 AM 10/1/2008, Chris Papageorgiou wrote: > >>Hello all, >>I'd like to point a subject on PXE server usage on a daily basis such as a >>service department. >>Im thinking of developing such system to load OS's(not strictly *NIX) >>installations through LAN than using a CD each time. >>What would be the cons,pros to such system and what are the limits? >> >>Looking forward for your replies. >> >>Best regards, >>Chris Papageorgiou > > Chris, > > Have you read the handbook on diskless clients? That will give you some > good background on the subject. > > The reason to use diskless clients is simplified support, where you only > need to update the diskless client boot to update all the clients that use > that boot. > > As for issues, bandwidth can be problematic, depending on the number of > clients, and if they all boot at the same time. > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PXE-real-life-use-tp19756184p19767056.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PXE real life use
At 03:03 AM 10/1/2008, Chris Papageorgiou wrote: Hello all, I'd like to point a subject on PXE server usage on a daily basis such as a service department. Im thinking of developing such system to load OS's(not strictly *NIX) installations through LAN than using a CD each time. What would be the cons,pros to such system and what are the limits? Looking forward for your replies. Best regards, Chris Papageorgiou Chris, Have you read the handbook on diskless clients? That will give you some good background on the subject. The reason to use diskless clients is simplified support, where you only need to update the diskless client boot to update all the clients that use that boot. As for issues, bandwidth can be problematic, depending on the number of clients, and if they all boot at the same time. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Who is anyone using for consulting or support?
I am working with a firm here in the Chicago area and they are interested in using FreeBSD, but would like to know of other outside support resources. I have checked the links on the FreeBSD.org website but have not gotten much response from firms on that list, which seems to be out of date. So if you know of a firm that offers support and consulting on FreeBSD in the continental US, please post back. Thanks. -Derek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Configure 2 gateways on a freebsd box for 2 interfaces
At 12:05 PM 9/10/2008, The Noob wrote: Hello all, I have a small question. I have two interface in two vlans. The first interface 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 The second interface: 10.228.44.1 255.255.255.0 The gateway for the first interface must be 192.168.0.254 and the second interface must be 10.228.44.254 How can I configure them? In rc.conf we have just defaultrouter but we can't specify the interface. Thanks for your help Best Regads TheNoob You can only have one default gateway by definition. You will need a static route to pass traffic from interface/subnet to the other. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problem using multiple monitors with gnome on FreeBSD 7
I did a new install of 7.0 on a system equipped with an nvidia 4 video port card with just two monitors attached. Xorg --configure worked fine, and setup xorg.conf correctly for both monitors. When I bring up X with gnome as root, both screens get used just fine. However when I bring up X with gnome as a regular user only one screen is used. So the problem appears permission related but I'm sure could be a configuration error as well. So if anyone has any advise on how to fix this, or where to look, I'd appreciate any guidance. Thanks, -Derek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Virtual machines hosted on FreeBSD 7
At 12:27 AM 9/9/2008, Alain G. Fabry wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:21:56PM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 7 release I wanted to use as a host for virtual > machines. What software is anyone else using to host virtual machines > under FreeBSD? > I use Qemu and run XP, Solaris, Gentoo, and FreeBSD as guests. Speed is not super, but workable for me since it is just to play with. Did you install qemu just from the ports? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Virtual machines hosted on FreeBSD 7
At 04:17 AM 9/9/2008, Albert Shih wrote: Le 08/09/2008 Ć 23:37:38-0400, Michael a Ć©crit > > > Derek Ragona wrote: > > I have a FreeBSD 7 release I wanted to use as a host for virtual > > machines. What software is anyone else using to host virtual machines > > under FreeBSD? > > > > I'd just like to here what has worked, or what has not worked. I find > > it easier to find a solution asking for real world experiences. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > -Derek > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >> In my honest opinion, there aren't many good ways of doing what I > think you're wanting. > VMware is a no go for now, or probably any time soon. I don't think > virtualbox is running on freebsd yet. You could use jails, for just > other freebsd installs, not really a VM so to speak. Well, depend what's you going to do with virtual machine, but jail is something very fine for apache/php server, databases etc... because you don't slow down the I/O (like vmware did). > bochs is crap for this purpose, simics doesn't run on it worth a crap > either. If I were you, I would use something else. say a hypervisor > running on bare hardware, ie: VMware ESX, or similar. I would say xen if > it was ready, but I don't think it is. And just for information VMware ESX is free now. I thought that the VMware ESX is just a trial version that quits running after a few weeks. But if I am wrong about that, let me know. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: {Spam?} Re: Virtual machines hosted on FreeBSD 7
At 10:37 PM 9/8/2008, Michael wrote: Derek Ragona wrote: I have a FreeBSD 7 release I wanted to use as a host for virtual machines. What software is anyone else using to host virtual machines under FreeBSD? I'd just like to here what has worked, or what has not worked. I find it easier to find a solution asking for real world experiences. Thanks for your help. -Derek [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> In my honest opinion, there aren't many good ways of doing what I think you're wanting. VMware is a no go for now, or probably any time soon. I don't think virtualbox is running on freebsd yet. You could use jails, for just other freebsd installs, not really a VM so to speak. bochs is crap for this purpose, simics doesn't run on it worth a crap either. If I were you, I would use something else. say a hypervisor running on bare hardware, ie: VMware ESX, or similar. I would say xen if it was ready, but I don't think it is. Cheers Mate, Mike Mike, Thanks for the quick response. I had seen that there are a lot of non-working virtual machine implementations. It seems a shame that as well as FreeBSD runs there are no ways to run a VM on it. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Virtual machines hosted on FreeBSD 7
I have a FreeBSD 7 release I wanted to use as a host for virtual machines. What software is anyone else using to host virtual machines under FreeBSD? I'd just like to here what has worked, or what has not worked. I find it easier to find a solution asking for real world experiences. Thanks for your help. -Derek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Cron Question
At 10:45 AM 9/2/2008, ElihuJ wrote: Hi all. I have a question about cron jobs that seem to be running to long or with multiple copies of itself. For example, I have a backup script that I run that seems to make multiple copies of itself. If I view the running processes I see numerous instances of the same cron job. Is there something I can do to limit this from happening? When it does, it drains my CPU and some of my other processes are non responsive. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cron-Question-tp19272656p19272656.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. For longer running jobs I do a couple things. I use a file to be sure only one instance is running, but I also add signal handling. The following is written for ksh, but can be adapted to sh if needed: = #!/usr/local/bin/ksh # uncomment the following line for debugging #set -x RUNNING_FILE=RUNNING_FILE=/tmp/my_cronjob_running LOGFILE=LOGFILE=/tmp/my_cronjob.log [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAIL=/usr/bin/mail TOUCH=/usr/bin/touch RM=/bin/rm # Print an epilog string and clear the RUNNING_FILE function epilog { echo "We are all done scanning." >> $LOGFILE $MAIL -s "MyCronjob Report" $SENDTO < $LOGFILE if [ -f $RUNNING_FILE ]; then $RM $RUNNING_FILE; fi } function got_signal { echo "Got a signal" >> $LOGFILE epilog exit } # Here pointers to signal handling subroutines are set trap got_signal TERM HUP INT QUIT if [ -f $RUNNING_FILE ]; then echo "mycronjob is already running" else $TOUCH $RUNNING_FILE $RM $LOGFILE $TOUCH $LOGFILE # add your job to be done here . . . # epilog fi = ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: /etc/hosts
At 08:53 PM 9/1/2008, Tom Marchand wrote: I am trying to resolve the 192.168.2.3 address. ::1 localhost.local localhost 127.0.0.1 localhost.local localhost 72.15.233.132 host.local host 72.15.233.132 host.local. 192.168.2.3 test On Sep 1, 2008, at 8:10 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote: Tom Marchand said the following on 9/1/08 7:52 PM: Hi, I've got an issue where hosts defined in my /etc/hosts are not being resolved. I've looked at resolv.conf, host.conf and nsswitch.conf and everything looks ok. It's my understanding that with the below configurations, /etc/hosts should be used first then DNS. Correct? This is a 6.1 system. Can we see your /etc/hosts file? Best, --Glenn What error are you getting from ping? Is it not able to ping the ip 192.168.2.3? Or is the ping unable to route to that network and host? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: /etc/hosts
At 06:52 PM 9/1/2008, Tom Marchand wrote: Hi, I've got an issue where hosts defined in my /etc/hosts are not being resolved. I've looked at resolv.conf, host.conf and nsswitch.conf and everything looks ok. It's my understanding that with the below configurations, /etc/hosts should be used first then DNS. Correct? This is a 6.1 system. host# cat resolv.conf local domain nameserver x.x.x.x cat host.conf # Auto-generated from nsswitch.conf, do not edit hosts dns host# cat nsswitch.conf group: compat group_compat: nis hosts: files dns networks: files passwd: compat passwd_compat: nis shells: files Check your /etc/rc.conf and look that the correct IP and hostname are set in there. You may have a typo. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: nvidia 32bit driver
At 03:59 PM 9/1/2008, DĆ”nielisz LĆ”szlĆ³ wrote: Hello! I just install my new FreeBSD7.0 system, everything its up tu date, but when I try to install /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver I always got the following error message: ===> Building for nvidia-driver-173.14.12 ===> src (all) "/usr/share/mk/bsd.kmod.mk", line 12: "can't find kernel source tree" *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-173.14.12. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver. Do you have any idea what the problem could be? Do you have the full source tree? Check that /usr/src is properly populated. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: MTA advice ??
At 01:06 PM 8/24/2008, pete wrote: I have a hosted domain that recently changed their mail filtering. I am not happy with the new setup and am considering setting up my own. Looking for tips on setting up something on my freeBSD 6.1 box. My ISP is cablevision IO. Not sure what they allow, ie: whether I can have my hosted domain set to use my cable IP as a MTA, or if I have to do some kind of end run around cablevision to get a MTA set up locally. Also looking for advice on which software would serve me bet in this instance. TIA Pete C You will need either a static IP, or subscribe to a service that will update your DNS entry as your IP changes. I prefer to use a static IP, but you need to see if your ISP will give you one. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: space char shell script problem
At 05:19 AM 8/23/2008, David Banning wrote: I am running into a problem with the space character in filenames. For instance, If I want to run the script; for x in `ls` do echo $x done then filenames that have a space in them ie: "john smith.jpg" are processed by my script as two names, "john" and "smith.jpg". What is the best way to deal with this type of space problem in the shell? I know that file names in quotes solves some problems but I can't tranfer that to my script. Depending on what your script is doing, I would use an intermediate file and awk. Something like: ls >/tmp/mytempfile cat /tmp/mytempfile | awk '{ print $0 }' if you are looking for something special add grep to the mix: cat /tmp/mytempfile | awk '{ print $0 }'|grep -i [some name pattern] rm /tmp/mytempfile You can save the results to another temporary file for more processing, or use awk more to create commandlines to execute in another script file such as: cat /tmp/mytempfile | awk '{ print $0 }'|grep -i [some name pattern] | awk '{printf"cp %s /backup/backupdir\n", $0)}' >/tmp/mycopyscript chmod +x /tmp/mycopyscript /tmp/mycopyscript So depending on what your original script was doing, this method may work for you. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: OT: Clamd error
At 11:17 AM 8/21/2008, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: Hi all, Sorry for cross-posting but it seams that the members from the other list went on vacation- and I'm in a jam I run exim 4.69 clamav .93 and spamassassin on a freebsd box - basically it gets my smtp traffic, checks for spam virus etc,, then forwards it to my mailserver- Suddenly last night it stopped working , I check the paniclog and all I see is 2008-08-21 09:44:26 1KWASY-EF-PB malware acl condition: clamd: unable to connect to UNIX socket /var/run/clamav/clamd (No such file or directory) 2008-08-21 09:44:34 1KWASh-EZ-Pq malware acl condition: clamd: unable to connect to UNIX socket /var/run/clamav/clamd (No such file or directory) 2008-08-21 09:45:09 1KWARf-EG-En malware acl condition: clamd: unable to connect to UNIX socket /var/run/clamav/clamd (No such file or directory) 2008-08-21 09:45:38 1KWATZ-EG-9e malware acl condition: clamd: unable to connect to UNIX socket /var/run/clamav/clamd (No such file or directory) I unistalled clamav "make deinstall" Then "&& make clean" Then "make install clean" And I still get the same errors- the weird part is that when I do "top" clamd IS running- 22089 clamav 1 40 62132K 61616K accept 0:00 0.00% clamd Any help would be greatly appreciated as im rerouting my mail now- and getting bombarded with spam Thx If restarting the clam services doesn't fix this, edit your conf files and make sure you have the same names for the socket file. -Derek ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ
At 08:24 AM 8/21/2008, Marcel Grandemange wrote: On a different dilemma, I have a FreeBSD proxy server with what looks like a failing drive. The drive ONLY holds cache so is not critical for system operation however id still like to try something. It seem that no matter how many times I run fsck it still comes up with same result, is there a way to isolate the bad sectors and use the replacement ones on drive? Or even just isolate so that I can continue using the drive for now. su-2.05b# fsck -y /dev/ad1s1d ** /dev/ad1s1d ** Last Mounted on /mnt/cache ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes CANNOT READ BLK: 15430784 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CONTINUE? yes THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 15430836, 15430837, 15430838, 1543 0839, 15430840, 15430841, 15430842, 15430843, 15430844, 15430845, 15430846, 1543 0847, ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 366612 files, 8044663 used, 1423024 free (125376 frags, 162206 blocks, 1.3% frag mentation) * FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY * * PLEASE RERUN FSCK * su-2.05b# fsck -y /dev/ad1s1d ** /dev/ad1s1d ** Last Mounted on /mnt/cache ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes CANNOT READ BLK: 15430784 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CONTINUE? yes THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 15430836, 15430837, 15430838, 1543 0839, 15430840, 15430841, 15430842, 15430843, 15430844, 15430845, 15430846, 1543 0847, ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 366612 files, 8044663 used, 1423024 free (125376 frags, 162206 blocks, 1.3% frag mentation) * FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY * * PLEASE RERUN FSCK * Sounds like the media has failed. You can try running diagnostics from the hard drive manufacturer and test the disk, but you likely need to replace it. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sendmail secondary server routing to alternate port
At 12:16 PM 8/19/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: Greetings, I recently had to rebuild my brother's all in one box to get a SATA controller working. It is now running 7.0 release and was previously using courier and the mail system. With this rebuild, I have switched him over to sendmail and most things are working, but I discovered a small issue with sendmail that I am having trouble working out. As well as being his own primary email server, he acts as secondary for a couple of my domains, the tricky part is my ISP shut off port 25 access to me (no, I am not a spammer) so I use port 587 for handling mail. With courier, I was able to specify specific ports to communicate with on a per domain basis. For example, if I was relaying for example.org on port 2345, I would specify example.org:2345 and that is the port it would use to talk to example.org. Now that I have switched to sendmail, I don't see a way to set the destination port on a per domain basis, only on an all or nothing basis. Am I missing some piece of the documentation or is this an actual limitation of sendmail? If you do nothing special, sendmail will handle both ports 587 and 25. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
{Disarmed} Re: best website for used thinkpads?
At 05:06 PM 8/16/2008, Gary Kline wrote: It's time to think about replacing my old 600E that died last March with a faster (Mhz >= 1.8 || Mz <= 2.2 ), and drop in a large drive and max out the RAM. I'm already begun googling around, but figured that the ThinkPad folks here might have a preferred website. Any favorite? tia, gary lenova sells refurbished ones from their website. -Derek -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
{Disarmed} Re: {Spam?} {Disarmed} Re: Sendmail email delays
At 07:49 PM 8/15/2008, Tom Stuart wrote: I have tried doing the forwarding via /etc/mail/aliases and it worked identically as it was with the /root/.forward. The mail does go through but gets delayed 5+ minutes, however when I send mail interactively using mailx or mail commands the receiving mailserver receives the message instantly. I'd also like to add that if I restart sendmail via /etc/rc.d/sendmail restart the mail gets instantly received also...Thanks for the help thus far Check your sendmail options in /etc/rc.conf and if you don't have any there, check the defaults. Usually you are running two versions of sendmail. Check the sendmail flags you are using for something like -q5m. If you see this, try changing the value and see if that effects your delivery time. -Derek On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Derek Ragona <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 03:49 PM 8/15/2008, Tom Stuart wrote: I've been having trouble sending email that was sent via a process(swatch). I can send emails fine via command-line and receive immediately to the forwarded address. However when sent via swatch it can take 5-10 minutes. These entries appear in /var/log/mailllog. Note this is all relating to the same email and notice the 11 minute delay. Thanks in advance for any help. Aug 15 14:35:12 firewall-1 sendmail[72747]: m7FKZCXf072747: from=username, size=155, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ocalhost Aug 15 14:35:12 firewall-1 sendmail[72747]: m7FKZCXf072747: to=root, delay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30155, stat=queued Aug 15 14:43:18 firewall-1 sendmail[72762]: m7FKhHx8072762: from=username, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aug 15 14:46:03 firewall-1 sm-mta[72794]: m7FKk3wc072794: from=< <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=512, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=Daemon0, relay=localhost [<http://127.0.0.1>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:<http://127.0.0.1> 127.0.0.1] Aug 15 14:46:03 firewall-1 sm-msp-queue[72793]: m7FKZCXf072747: to=root, ctladdr=username (1001/1001), delay=00:10:51, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=120155, relay=[<http://127.0.0.1>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:<http://127.0.0.1> 127.0.0.1 ] [<http://127.0.0.1>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:<http://127.0.0.1> 127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (m7FKk3wc072794 Message accepted for delivery) Aug 15 14:46:03 firewall-1 sm-mta[72795]: m7FKk3wc072794: to= <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1001/1001), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:0 0:00, mailer=relay, pri=30809, relay=<http://smtp.xxx.com>smtp.xxx.com. [<http://10.0.0.2>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:<http://10.0.0.2> 10.0.0.2], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent ( <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Queued mail for delivery) I think its important to know these details: firewall-1# uname -a FreeBSD <http://firewall-1.xxx.com>firewall-1.xxx.com 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #2: Tue Feb 5 07:10:05 MST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FIREWALL-1 i386 There is a .forward file in /root to forward root's mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is to be sent via smarthost. I have the smarthost "DS" parameter in /etc/mail/<http://sendmail.cf>sendmail.cf configured to use <http://DSsmtp.xxx.com>DSsmtp.xxx.com /etc/hosts contains localhost <http://127.0.0.1>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:<http://127.0.0.1> 127.0.0.1 firewall-1 <http://firewall-1.xxx.com>firewall-1.xxx.com <http://smtp.xxx.com>smtp.xxx.com <http://10.0.0.2>MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:<http://10.0.0.2> 10.0.0.2 Have you tried changing the alias for root to the forwarded address in /etc/mail/aliases? You can make the change there and rebuild the aliases file. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: RES: RES: Very Slow Samba
At 09:37 AM 8/15/2008, Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria wrote: Hi Derek, I didn't have any Intel boards here for spare, but i Found a HP PCI-Express 1x Giga Ethernet here. It's a broadcom chipset, I did replace the card but still with the same problem. I also did a very deep research in google and found more people with the same problem and everyone of them without a solution. I guess that it's a issue between Samba and FreeBSD. I do say that 'cuz on Linux+Samba (Debian Kernel+Samba.deb) this issue does not appear. Anyway, If you have another idea. BTW, this box was the same box that used to run Windows 2003 with SQL Server. Thank you for the support. Best Regards, Mauro Ribeiro Mauro, I'd look at your samba configuration and DNS configuration. If you have samba running on another *NIX OS faster I'd compare the samba, authentication, and dns configurations. I'd still suggest you buy a new intel ethernet. These are not expensive and I know they work well under any load. For a test, you could also try FreeNAS instead of FreeBSD+Samba. It is essentially the same but all "packaged" for file sharing. -Derek -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Derek Ragona Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2008 17:39 Para: Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Assunto: Re: RES: Very Slow Samba At 03:22 PM 8/14/2008, Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria wrote: >Hi Derek, > >I don't use authentication on this server, no internet connection. Only 1 >share and on this share everyone must have write permissions. > >re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > >options=399bT,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC> > ether 00:e0:4c:10:c9:75 > inet 192.168.0.254 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) > status: active > >It's a realtek gigabit pci card. 8169 chipset. First thing I'd do is replace the realtek. They are terrible especially under any load. Replace with a gigabit card from intel. Then see how it works. -Derek >-Mensagem original- >De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Derek Ragona >Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2008 14:17 >Para: Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria; >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Assunto: Re: Very Slow Samba > >At 10:21 AM 8/14/2008, Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria wrote: > >Hi All, > > > > > > > >I had migrated a Windows 2003 Server to a Samba Server (only for file >share) > > > > > > > >We share only the company system. That's a 3mb Delphi .exe and a 1,5mb > >libmysql.dll. > > > > > > > >BTW, the system loads 4 .jpg files from the server. > > > > > > > >On our old Windows Server the system was very fast on Samba is damn slow. > >About 2 mins to load. > > > > > > > >I have no clue on what to do. > > > > > > > >Server Specs: Pentium 4 3.0Ghz 1GB RAM, FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE and Samba > >3.0.28a. > > > > > > > >Here's is my smb.conf > > > > > > > >[global] > > > >workgroup = CLASS > > > >server string = Class Data Server > > > >security = share > > > >hosts allow = 192.168.0. > > > >load printers = yes > > > >printing = cups > > > >log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > > >max log size = 150 > > > >socket options = TCP_NODELAY > > > >interfaces = 192.168.0.0/24 > > > >dns proxy = no > > > >veto oplock files = /*.exe/*.dll/*.jpg/*.pdf/*.gif/ > > > >oplock break wait time = 1 > > > >debug level = 10 > > > > > > > >[Class] > > > > Comment = Class > > > > Browseable = Yes > > > > Writeable = Yes > > > > Force User = root > > > > create mask = 0777 > > > > path = /dados/samba/Class > > > > Guest ok = Yes > > > > fake oplocks = yes > > > > > > > > > > > >Best Regards, > > > >Mauro Ribeiro > > > > > >What network card is in this server? > >What are you using for authentication? > > -Derek > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > >___
Re: Sendmail email delays
At 03:49 PM 8/15/2008, Tom Stuart wrote: I've been having trouble sending email that was sent via a process(swatch). I can send emails fine via command-line and receive immediately to the forwarded address. However when sent via swatch it can take 5-10 minutes. These entries appear in /var/log/mailllog. Note this is all relating to the same email and notice the 11 minute delay. Thanks in advance for any help. Aug 15 14:35:12 firewall-1 sendmail[72747]: m7FKZCXf072747: from=username, size=155, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ocalhost Aug 15 14:35:12 firewall-1 sendmail[72747]: m7FKZCXf072747: to=root, delay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30155, stat=queued Aug 15 14:43:18 firewall-1 sendmail[72762]: m7FKhHx8072762: from=username, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aug 15 14:46:03 firewall-1 sm-mta[72794]: m7FKk3wc072794: from=< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=512, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=Daemon0, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Aug 15 14:46:03 firewall-1 sm-msp-queue[72793]: m7FKZCXf072747: to=root, ctladdr=username (1001/1001), delay=00:10:51, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=120155, relay=[127.0.0.1 ] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (m7FKk3wc072794 Message accepted for delivery) Aug 15 14:46:03 firewall-1 sm-mta[72795]: m7FKk3wc072794: to= [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1001/1001), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:0 0:00, mailer=relay, pri=30809, relay=smtp.xxx.com. [10.0.0.2], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent ( <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Queued mail for delivery) I think its important to know these details: firewall-1# uname -a FreeBSD firewall-1.xxx.com 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #2: Tue Feb 5 07:10:05 MST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FIREWALL-1 i386 There is a .forward file in /root to forward root's mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is to be sent via smarthost. I have the smarthost "DS" parameter in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf configured to use DSsmtp.xxx.com /etc/hosts contains localhost 127.0.0.1 firewall-1 firewall-1.xxx.com smtp.xxx.com 10.0.0.2 Have you tried changing the alias for root to the forwarded address in /etc/mail/aliases? You can make the change there and rebuild the aliases file. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Another No disks found during Install
At 04:29 PM 8/14/2008, Bernard Lecuire wrote: Hello, I have a problem with the installation. I choose country, keyboard and then I can not continue installation, because it says "No disks found! Please verify that your disk controller is being..." Hardware: Acer Aspire M1641,Intel Pentium Dual Core E2180, nVidia GeForce 7050, sata-500 Here is what i get during boot sequence: (...cut...) hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Feb 24 2008 10:34:18) (...cut...) atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 8.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] (...cut...) I tried to install without success FreeBSD 7.0, 8.0, OpenBSD, NetBSD, and 4-5 Linux distros. Anyone an idea? Bernard Did you try creating a raid array first? Most raid controllers will operate in RAID or pass through mode. Choose the mode you want, and create an array if you want before trying the install. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: RES: Very Slow Samba
At 03:22 PM 8/14/2008, Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria wrote: Hi Derek, I don't use authentication on this server, no internet connection. Only 1 share and on this share everyone must have write permissions. re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=399b ether 00:e0:4c:10:c9:75 inet 192.168.0.254 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) status: active It's a realtek gigabit pci card. 8169 chipset. First thing I'd do is replace the realtek. They are terrible especially under any load. Replace with a gigabit card from intel. Then see how it works. -Derek -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Derek Ragona Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2008 14:17 Para: Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Assunto: Re: Very Slow Samba At 10:21 AM 8/14/2008, Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria wrote: >Hi All, > > > >I had migrated a Windows 2003 Server to a Samba Server (only for file share) > > > >We share only the company system. That's a 3mb Delphi .exe and a 1,5mb >libmysql.dll. > > > >BTW, the system loads 4 .jpg files from the server. > > > >On our old Windows Server the system was very fast on Samba is damn slow. >About 2 mins to load. > > > >I have no clue on what to do. > > > >Server Specs: Pentium 4 3.0Ghz 1GB RAM, FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE and Samba >3.0.28a. > > > >Here's is my smb.conf > > > >[global] > >workgroup = CLASS > >server string = Class Data Server > >security = share > >hosts allow = 192.168.0. > >load printers = yes > >printing = cups > >log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > >max log size = 150 > >socket options = TCP_NODELAY > >interfaces = 192.168.0.0/24 > >dns proxy = no > >veto oplock files = /*.exe/*.dll/*.jpg/*.pdf/*.gif/ > >oplock break wait time = 1 > >debug level = 10 > > > >[Class] > > Comment = Class > > Browseable = Yes > > Writeable = Yes > > Force User = root > > create mask = 0777 > > path = /dados/samba/Class > > Guest ok = Yes > > fake oplocks = yes > > > > > >Best Regards, > >Mauro Ribeiro > > What network card is in this server? What are you using for authentication? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" __ NOD32 3351 (20080813) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Migrate harddisk with FreeBSD into new machine
At 01:26 PM 8/14/2008, C.M. Burns wrote: Hi list, I have a problem. A faulty machine was running freeBSD with a two harddisk software raid. now these two disks should be put into a new machine, but of course it won't boot because it is new hardware. Kernel just reports: cannot mount root device from /dev/mirror/gm0s1a (or sth like this). question is now, how can i add the correct driver into the initial ramdisk (if there is such a thing on bsd) so the machine finds the two drives? second question: how can i afterwards remove the software mirror and only use one harddisk from that moment on? any help is very welcom, as i have no idea about bsd. i am a linux guy ;) thanks! What I would do, is install FreeBSD onto a new separate hard disk. Disks are cheap. Once you get the boot disk installed you can create a custom kernel if necessary to support the RAID. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Very Slow Samba
At 10:21 AM 8/14/2008, Mauro Ribeiro - Class Consultoria e Assessoria wrote: Hi All, I had migrated a Windows 2003 Server to a Samba Server (only for file share) We share only the company system. That's a 3mb Delphi .exe and a 1,5mb libmysql.dll. BTW, the system loads 4 .jpg files from the server. On our old Windows Server the system was very fast on Samba is damn slow. About 2 mins to load. I have no clue on what to do. Server Specs: Pentium 4 3.0Ghz 1GB RAM, FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE and Samba 3.0.28a. Here's is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = CLASS server string = Class Data Server security = share hosts allow = 192.168.0. load printers = yes printing = cups log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 150 socket options = TCP_NODELAY interfaces = 192.168.0.0/24 dns proxy = no veto oplock files = /*.exe/*.dll/*.jpg/*.pdf/*.gif/ oplock break wait time = 1 debug level = 10 [Class] Comment = Class Browseable = Yes Writeable = Yes Force User = root create mask = 0777 path = /dados/samba/Class Guest ok = Yes fake oplocks = yes Best Regards, Mauro Ribeiro What network card is in this server? What are you using for authentication? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Best SMTP Gateway Program and Reporting Tools
At 03:22 PM 8/12/2008, Josh Kidd wrote: I just wanted to pose this question to the list on people's opinions as to what the best SMTP Gateway program (ie. Sendmail, Postfix, etc) is and what the best log analysis tool for that SMTP program is. We are currently using Symantec Mail Security for our outgoing SMTP Gateway but want to employ an open-source solution instead. My problem is our main requirement is to have a way to view the logs on a web based interface that will allow our system administrators when a customer complains they didn't receive an email to be able to go into the logs and search by date/time and view the activity for that period to determine if the mail went through our system or if it was blocked and if so why. I've heard of and read about a few different programs like SMA and Anteater and pflogstats, but I don't know if these will have the functionality I need to allow admins to search logs for a specific date/time and/or specific phrase/address on a web based interface. I appreciate any help, advice in making this decision. Josh Josh, I use sendmail and sma. But I don't these fit your needs. In fact, I doubt you will find an opensource solution that does. For those types of features you need to spend some money and buy a commercial product. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd
At 01:32 AM 8/11/2008, AAH wrote: Hi, Can someone give me the correct settings to configure an att/sbcglobal 2wire 1800 gateway(it's a modem, router/gateway)to work with FreeBSD? I have been told my other users of FreeBSD that this router/gateway does work with FreeBSD. (Freebsd 6.3). However, the values given to me by att techs have not worked. This is why I am email you all for some assistance. The error message is that network/server is unknown or cannot be found. Thanks AAH The default setting for this router/gateway is to have the client systems on the LAN use DHCP for configuration. You should set your system up to use DHCP. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: BIND won't resolve my IPs (not upstream or something?)
At 05:41 AM 8/9/2008, Redd Vinylene wrote: I got this FreeBSD server called mother (80.252.2.2). On it, I've made two jails, camel (80.252.2.3) and box (80.252.2.4 through to 80.252.2.127). The problem is that reverse lookups for any of the IPs preceding .4 on box fails. If I connect to IRC with .5 for instance, it times out and reverts back to .4, whose lookup works just fine. BIND runs on camel. Maybe the problem is that BIND is not upstream for all those IPs? (I don't know what that means, a friend just told me) Or that I haven't configured the reverse for any of the other IPs? I would really like to keep BIND running on camel, as its dedicated to all my vital network services, whereas box is the home of all my users, and thus expendable ;) Is there any way to modify BIND on camel, or must I set up an additional one on box? My (hopefully) relevant configuration files can be found here -- http://pastie.org/250469 -- much obliged, and thanks! You need to check that you have zone files for both forward and reverse lookups, and those zones are defined in named.conf -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: BIND won't resolve my IPs (not upstream or something?)
At 06:55 AM 8/9/2008, Redd Vinylene wrote: I'm pretty sure I do, though my apologies if I'm wrong, did you check my pastie? On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 05:41 AM 8/9/2008, Redd Vinylene wrote: > > I got this FreeBSD server called mother (80.252.2.2). On it, I've made > two jails, camel (80.252.2.3) and box (80.252.2.4 through to > 80.252.2.127). The problem is that reverse lookups for any of the IPs > preceding .4 on box fails. If I connect to IRC with .5 for instance, > it times out and reverts back to .4, whose lookup works just fine. > BIND runs on camel. Maybe the problem is that BIND is not upstream for > all those IPs? (I don't know what that means, a friend just told me) > Or that I haven't configured the reverse for any of the other IPs? I > would really like to keep BIND running on camel, as its dedicated to > all my vital network services, whereas box is the home of all my > users, and thus expendable ;) Is there any way to modify BIND on > camel, or must I set up an additional one on box? My (hopefully) > relevant configuration files can be found here -- > http://pastie.org/250469 -- much obliged, and thanks! > > You need to check that you have zone files for both forward and reverse > lookups, and those zones are defined in named.conf > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. Well, I never let my read of these files suffice. You should check them with the tools from bind: named-checkconf nemed-checkzone If they pass those tests, then check the resolution using just a single ip that is NOT jailed on this server using dig or nslookup. If those are working then adjust your jails. If you go step-by-step you will quickly get it working. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no boot/loader
At 07:11 PM 8/8/2008, acmeinc wrote: Excellent! I will try this among the other things mentioned when I get back home. Final note, what would this BIOS MBR setting look like normally, or an idea of where to look in the CMOS. THanks A lot of BIOS's have a setting for boot virus prevention, or it will just be to enable or disable the boot area being written. Most BIOS's have just a few pages of settings, so look through them all. -Derek Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 07:00 PM 8/8/2008, acmeinc wrote: > >>Check things? Which things should I be checking for? And where should I be >>checking them, to be more specific, which optoin should I choose within >>sysinstall to check the things? >> >>I am reading on another forum the installation is incorrect and to try >>again, however I have tried many times. Do you think the minimun install is >>not enough to allow for bootup? > > Before you exit sysinstall, go to the emergency shell I believe alt+F4 > will > get you there. Then do: > mount > > The output from mount will show where the new filesystems are mounted. > You > can check that /boot is populated and that you have a kernel in > /boot/kernel/kernel. To check those you'd type: > > ls -al [fill in the root mount point]/boot > > and > > ls -al [fill in the root mount point]/boot/kernel/kernel > > Check your BIOS settings. It is likely you have a setting in the BIOS > preventing the boot area being written. > > -Derek > > > > >>Derek Ragona wrote: >> > >> > At 04:42 PM 8/8/2008, acmeinc wrote: >> > >> >>No /boot/loader >> >>no /boot/kernel/kernel >> >> >> >>I isntalled FreeBSD 7.0 with the defaults for partiioning. I am using >> one >> >>hard drive in which I followed with the ASQ (auto, tag for boot, quit) >> >>command. I choose the standard boot loader option. I installed through >> the >> >>master freebsd site via ethernet. Upon the congratulation screen is >> asks >>for >> >>a reboot, and to remove the boot disk, I resart to the error message >>above. >> >>I believe it is because a boot loader is not installed, however, it >> should >> >>be. Is it not in the set up, it is one of the first steps. >> >> >> >>Following the errors I am in put into a boot prompt: >> >> >> >>boot: >> >> >> >>Are there any commands I can run from this prompt to manually boot? How >>can >> >>I make the boot work? Will I need to install my own boot loader? How >> can I >> >>install a manul boot loader? How can I check if the boot loader is >> >>installed, but just not loading properly? >> > >> > You would do well do try the install again, but check things BEFORE you >> > allow sysinstall to exit and reboot. Also check that your BIOS has any >> > anti-virus settings not allowing the boot area of the hard disk to be >> > written, turned off. >> > >> > -Derek >> > >> > -- >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> > believed to be clean. >> > >> > ___ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> > >> > >> >>-- >>View this message in context: >>http://www.nabble.com/no-boot-loader-tp18899421p18900779.html >>Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>___ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/no-boot-loader-tp18899421p18900844.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no boot/loader
At 07:00 PM 8/8/2008, acmeinc wrote: Check things? Which things should I be checking for? And where should I be checking them, to be more specific, which optoin should I choose within sysinstall to check the things? I am reading on another forum the installation is incorrect and to try again, however I have tried many times. Do you think the minimun install is not enough to allow for bootup? Before you exit sysinstall, go to the emergency shell I believe alt+F4 will get you there. Then do: mount The output from mount will show where the new filesystems are mounted. You can check that /boot is populated and that you have a kernel in /boot/kernel/kernel. To check those you'd type: ls -al [fill in the root mount point]/boot and ls -al [fill in the root mount point]/boot/kernel/kernel Check your BIOS settings. It is likely you have a setting in the BIOS preventing the boot area being written. -Derek Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 04:42 PM 8/8/2008, acmeinc wrote: > >>No /boot/loader >>no /boot/kernel/kernel >> >>I isntalled FreeBSD 7.0 with the defaults for partiioning. I am using one >>hard drive in which I followed with the ASQ (auto, tag for boot, quit) >>command. I choose the standard boot loader option. I installed through the >>master freebsd site via ethernet. Upon the congratulation screen is asks for >>a reboot, and to remove the boot disk, I resart to the error message above. >>I believe it is because a boot loader is not installed, however, it should >>be. Is it not in the set up, it is one of the first steps. >> >>Following the errors I am in put into a boot prompt: >> >>boot: >> >>Are there any commands I can run from this prompt to manually boot? How can >>I make the boot work? Will I need to install my own boot loader? How can I >>install a manul boot loader? How can I check if the boot loader is >>installed, but just not loading properly? > > You would do well do try the install again, but check things BEFORE you > allow sysinstall to exit and reboot. Also check that your BIOS has any > anti-virus settings not allowing the boot area of the hard disk to be > written, turned off. > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/no-boot-loader-tp18899421p18900779.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: no boot/loader
At 04:42 PM 8/8/2008, acmeinc wrote: No /boot/loader no /boot/kernel/kernel I isntalled FreeBSD 7.0 with the defaults for partiioning. I am using one hard drive in which I followed with the ASQ (auto, tag for boot, quit) command. I choose the standard boot loader option. I installed through the master freebsd site via ethernet. Upon the congratulation screen is asks for a reboot, and to remove the boot disk, I resart to the error message above. I believe it is because a boot loader is not installed, however, it should be. Is it not in the set up, it is one of the first steps. Following the errors I am in put into a boot prompt: boot: Are there any commands I can run from this prompt to manually boot? How can I make the boot work? Will I need to install my own boot loader? How can I install a manul boot loader? How can I check if the boot loader is installed, but just not loading properly? You would do well do try the install again, but check things BEFORE you allow sysinstall to exit and reboot. Also check that your BIOS has any anti-virus settings not allowing the boot area of the hard disk to be written, turned off. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: memory allocation with malloc
At 01:16 AM 8/5/2008, Shyamal Shukla wrote: Hi All, I am trying to validate my understanding of how malloc works by means of the below C program which tries to corrupt essential information maintained by malloc for free() operation. The program allocates 4, 12 byte blocks (internally 16 bytes are allocated for each 12 byte block). Hence the total allocated space was 48 bytes. As malloc maintains the (length of allocated block + 1), 4 bytes before the returned pointer (from malloc), I have manipulated this length for the first block and set it to 49 with the goal that a single free shall release all these 4 blocks and a subsequent malloc of 15 bytes shall be from the address of first block. However, this does not happen. Can someone please correct my understanding and provide me with a reference to the working of malloc() and free()? #include int main(void) { char * ptr,* ptr1, *ptr2, * ptr3, * ptr4; int * i; int n,q,p; int loop = 0; ptr1 = (char *)malloc(12); i = (int *)(ptr1 - 4); printf("\n ptr1 = %p,%d \n",ptr1,*i); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[-4],ptr1[-3],ptr1[-2],ptr1[-1]); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[0],ptr1[1],ptr1[2],ptr1[3]); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[4],ptr1[5],ptr1[6],ptr1[7]); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[8],ptr1[9],ptr1[10],ptr1[11]); *i = 49; ptr2 = (char *)malloc(12); i = (int *)(ptr2 - 4); printf("\n ptr2 = %p,%d \n",ptr2,*i); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr2[-4],ptr2[-3],ptr2[-2],ptr2[-1]); ptr3 = (char *)malloc(12); i = (int *)(ptr3 - 4); printf("\n ptr3 = %p,%d \n",ptr3,*i); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr3[-4],ptr3[-3],ptr3[-2],ptr3[-1]); ptr4 = (char *)malloc(12); i = (int *)(ptr4 - 4); printf("\n ptr4 = %p,%d \n",ptr4,*i); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr4[-4],ptr4[-3],ptr4[-2],ptr4[-1]); free(ptr1); printf("\n ANALYZE-\n"); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[-4],ptr1[-3],ptr1[-2],ptr1[-1]); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[0],ptr1[1],ptr1[2],ptr1[3]); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[4],ptr1[5],ptr1[6],ptr1[7]); printf("\n %d:%d:%d:%d\n",ptr1[8],ptr1[9],ptr1[10],ptr1[11]); ptr = (char *)malloc(15); i = (int *)(ptr - 4); printf("\n ptr = %p,%d \n",ptr,*i); return; } Thanks and Regards, Shyamal I'm not quite sure what it is you want to accomplish with this program. However, malloc and free work on the program's given data area. This data area can be increased should there be a need for more memory. You should NEVER assume that memory blocks are contiguous. There are many reasons why they would not be contiguous among them compiler optimizations. If you really want to delve into how a program is executed, have the compiler output the assembler code and look at that. The assembler code will show exactly how and where the variables are allocated. With such small amount of data used in your program, it is possible the variables are all just on the stack. You may want to check out the brk and sbrk man pages as they will give you some information into how memory management was originally done as these functions are lower-level than malloc and free. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IBM eServer x225 - LSI 1030 SCSI - BTX Halted / infinite loop
At 04:56 AM 8/6/2008, underligast wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Derek Ragona wrote: > Obviously it is the SCSI card or drives. Have you tried changing the > BIOS settings on the SCSI? You might want to try changing the SCSI BUS > speed. You may also want to try turning off hyperthreading. > > -Derek > Disabling Hyperthreading didn't do anything, and i cannot find many options for the SCSI. I'll try lowering the speed and i will also try another drive if i can find one. I also tried 8.0-current bootcd and that lists the dvd-rom and the floppy but none of the disks. There's another four x225:s at work but they all have lsi-controllers. I was really looking forward to using the hotswap.. Thank you for your replies, i hope you can help me fix this eventually It sounds like your controller either it isn't recognized or supported. You can try a different SCSI card or see if your SCSI has a firmware that is update-able and try different firmware version. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IBM eServer x225 - LSI 1030 SCSI - BTX Halted / infinite loop
At 01:42 PM 8/5/2008, underligast wrote: I'm trying to install FreeBSD 7.0 on my "new" server, an IBM eServer x225 (8647-5CG) The server/drives runs fine under windows 2003 and ubuntu server but the FreeBSD installation just halts. So far i've tried: CD: disk1 from 6.2, 7.0, CD: bootonly from 7.0 Floppys: 7.0 They all end the same, cds with an infinite loop of numbers, floppys with BTX Halted and a lot of numbers. int=000derr=efl=00010006eip=000219b2 eax=000219acebx=ecx=c080edx=000587d8 esi=0003e007edi=ebp=0008fcbcesp=00099c88 cs=0008 ds=0010 es=0010 fs=0010 gs=0010 ss=0010 cs:eip=0f 32 0d 00 01 00 00 0f-30 0f 20 e0 83 c8 30 0f 22 e0 b8 00 c0 03 00 0f-22 d8 0f 20 c0 0d 00 00 ss:esp=90 95 00 00 00 80 fc 00-00 90 fc 00 07 e0 03 00 00 00 00 00 07 d0 03 00-00 00 00 00 cc 87 05 00 BTX halted The only difference is when i boot from 7.0-STABLE-200804-i386-bootonly.iso, then i see BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.02 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS CD is cd0 BIOS drive A: is disk0 Then it stops. If i remove both the harddrives i can boot into the freebsd installer, but as there are no drives, there is nowhere to install. Atleast when i started with the floppys it detected drive1 and 2 before BTX halted.. I dont know what to do anymore, there is just no way to get freebsd to install on this thing. Is it the LSI controller, it should still be initiated when there are no drives in it, and the installation starts fine then. Is it the Motherboard, the bios, the cpu, the ram? what? The disks, having just one in doesn't work, switching positions doesn't work? Does anyone have any idea on how i can proceed once i'm in the installation, can i mount the drives and install somehow? The hardware is: 1x Xeon 2.8GHz(512KB), 2x 2048MB PC2100 DDR SDRAM (ecc), 2x 74GB 10K rpm U320 HDD, Ultra320 SCSI, 48x CD-ROM, Broadcom NetXtreme 10/100/1000 Integrated Ethernet, ATI Rage XL Obviously it is the SCSI card or drives. Have you tried changing the BIOS settings on the SCSI? You might want to try changing the SCSI BUS speed. You may also want to try turning off hyperthreading. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Controlling read access
At 04:16 PM 7/31/2008, John Almberg wrote: I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I do provide a small number of users ftp access. Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home directories have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log in as one user, I can read and even download the contents of other users home directories. I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this? Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way? Thanks: John I've used vsftp from the ports. It is very configurable to the point you can even specify which ftp commands to allow. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter
At 10:08 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > At 05:45 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > > > > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 > > > > -Derek > > > > /var/mail is at 775, so that's not it... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ stat /var/mail > 89 47105 drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 188185 512 "Jul 30 03:01:51 2008" "Jul 30 > 16:35:18 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Feb 24 12:49:40 2008" 4096 4 0 > /var/mail > > > > I would kick up the logging on sendmail to see better what is going on and > where the failure really is. You can add: > -O LogLevel=80 > To your sendmail options in /etc/rc.conf > > Since root can send mail but regular users cannot, it sounds like a > permission problem somewhere. > > -Derek > It turns out that FreeBSD wasn't happy with its host name. I changed it to a host name that resolves properly, and sendmail began to work as expected. Thanks for looking at this. -Andy Andy, Sendmail is VERY dns dependent as you found out. Glad all is working fine. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array?
At 07:53 PM 7/30/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! I created the array in the Adaptec BIOS and confirmed it with an XP installer disk, which gave me the option to install to the array as I had named it. I have to apologise for not having the actual dmesg handy but identifies the disks much like the example below, but with Seagate disks. It does not identify any striping or make any differentiation between the discs other than the target id. . da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) da1 at ahd0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) Regards Are you seeing any aacd drives in the dmesg? This would be the device name for an advanced adaptec raid drive. -Derek Derek Ragona wrote: At 07:14 PM 7/30/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Derek, As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS (SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and states that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as the NIC adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could find a USB key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors to consider. Regards What does dmesg show for da0 and da1? Did you actually create the array in the Adaptec RAID BIOS? If you did, with a stripped array I'd expect dmesg to only report da0 as the stripped compendium of both disks. -Derek Derek Ragona wrote: At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am fighting the following hardware: MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on the channels to 160mb. If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see ahd0 in fdisk. There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to install to and I only have da0 or da1. Thanks for your time Have you defined an array? If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP)
At 07:35 PM 7/30/2008, Andrew Falanga wrote: Hi, I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3 (I use dovecot). At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for this. As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see authid= in the mail log (I'm using TLS with sendmail). One of the pastor's told me the error he's seeing is "timeout." They are using Outlook, I'm not sure of the version. What problems do people here usually encounter with Outlook mail clients and their SMTP servers? At this point, I'd just like to have some leads. Any ideas what might be keeping them from sending? They can all log in and receive e-mail POP3. Thanks, Andy Andy, These errors can be some of the hardest to track down. I would go to one of the problem users and try sending email with their client as you watch the maillog from a ssh window. Outlook and Outlook express send mail a bit differently so you will need to know which client they are using. Also, if sending mail was working, and just stopped, I'd suspect some microsoft patch as the culprit. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: {Spam?} Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array?
At 07:14 PM 7/30/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Derek, As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS (SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and states that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as the NIC adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could find a USB key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors to consider. Regards What does dmesg show for da0 and da1? Did you actually create the array in the Adaptec RAID BIOS? If you did, with a stripped array I'd expect dmesg to only report da0 as the stripped compendium of both disks. -Derek Derek Ragona wrote: At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am fighting the following hardware: MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on the channels to 160mb. If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see ahd0 in fdisk. There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to install to and I only have da0 or da1. Thanks for your time Have you defined an array? If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter
At 05:45 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 > > -Derek > /var/mail is at 775, so that's not it... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ stat /var/mail 89 47105 drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 188185 512 "Jul 30 03:01:51 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Feb 24 12:49:40 2008" 4096 4 0 /var/mail I would kick up the logging on sendmail to see better what is going on and where the failure really is. You can add: -O LogLevel=80 To your sendmail options in /etc/rc.conf Since root can send mail but regular users cannot, it sounds like a permission problem somewhere. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter
At 07:52 AM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: Sendmail is running & DNS is working. See the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/andy]# /etc/rc.d/sendmail status sendmail_submit is running as pid 71703. sendmail_clientmqueue is running as pid 675. [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/andy]# ping gmail.com PING gmail.com (64.233.161.83): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=0 ttl=239 time=19.943 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.096 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.568 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=19.368 ms ^C --- gmail.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 19.368/20.994/22.568/1.364 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/andy]# mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test This is a test!! EOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/andy]# exit exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Another test!! Test sent from a normal user EOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /home/andy/dead.letter... Saved message in /home/andy/dead.letter Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size
At 11:04 PM 7/29/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer to use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that the peer will never try to send a packet larger than that? I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In case it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and I've been unable to find a way to limit its packet size directly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Just as an FYI, you might want to do: man setsockopt ro man getsockopt Each tcp conversation can have it's own size set along with a bunch of other params. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array?
At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am fighting the following hardware: MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on the channels to 160mb. If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see ahd0 in fdisk. There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to install to and I only have da0 or da1. Thanks for your time Have you defined an array? If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: {Spam?} Re: Sendmail local LAN delivery
At 03:49 PM 7/27/2008, Bruno Joho wrote: Hi Derek thanks for the reply. My intention was to deliver the mails between the workstations on the LAN directly. Every Workstation on the LAN would have an appropriate cf file which forwards mails with a destination on the WAN - to the WAN-Smarthost, any mail going to a destination from inside the LAN would be delivered directly to the destination host without involving a (LAN) smarthost. Is that possible somehow? Thanks for your help Bruno That scenario is possible, but you may still need DNS MX records to point to the smart host as well. You can have multiple MX records for a domain (or subdomain) where the value field is higher for a farther away mail server, or for a secondary mail server. Sendmail uses DNS to figure routing along with the internal configuration file UNLESS you specify to sendmail to NOT use DNS. So you have some choices in how you configure sendmail and/or DNS. Also it may help you to test things on one system and bump up the sendmail logging so the /var/log/maillog file has more information. Use the option: -O LogLevel=80 Or some other value than 80. You can add these options to your sendmail flags in /etc/rc.conf -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Sendmail local LAN delivery
At 06:30 AM 7/24/2008, Bruno Joho wrote: Hi folks we have a inside the Lab (Class B Net, eg: bnet.ourdomain.com) several workstations (eg: host1.intra015.bnet.ourdomain.com) in different Class C Net (eg.intra015.bnet.ourdomain.com). There is a Mail Hub outside the Class B Net which communicates with the Internet and delivers the mails sent by the workstations. All workstations have a "Smarthost" entry in the cf file. Incoming mails are collected by the mailhub, which provides IMAP and POP access for all workstations. No mail coming from the Internet will be delivered directly to the workstations. Everything works fine, exept one (small) problem. How can I configure the sendmal.cf from the local workstations to send the mail addressed to a neighbour workstation (eg. from host1.intra015.bnet.ourdomain.com to host2.intra016.bnet.ourdomain.com) directly. Sending it to the mailhub and then sending it back to the Intranet is no option due to firewall restrictions. I apreciate any help, thanks Bruno Bruno, If I understand your question correctly, you will need to smarthosts, one on the LAN side, and one on the WAN/internet side. You will have to setup the LAN smarthost to forward mail to the WAN smarthost that it cannot deliver. You will have to enable the LAN smarthost and WAN smarthost to be able to pass mail through your firewall. Sendmail uses DNS for most host resolution, so you will need to setup MX records for the various LAN hosts to go to the LAN smarthost. Hope this helps. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Repeating Mail
At 10:47 PM 7/15/2008, lyd mc wrote: Hi guys, Some of my mail users receive repeating mail. I am using sendmail and my user uses MS Outlook to send/receive. Is there any way to solve this problem? Thank you. Best regards, alyd Check the user's outlook setup. It is likely they are leaving email on the server and it is not being deleted from the server, so it is sent down to the client again. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem with sendmail and su
At 05:44 AM 7/9/2008, Nicolas Letellier wrote: Hello. I use FreeBSD 7 with sendmail. I have a problem for sending email. More precisely, with the sender of the mail. When I'm logged to my machine in root, the mail is sent with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with sender. OK, no problems. When I'm logged to my machine in nicolas, the mail is sent with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with sender. OK, no problems. However, when I'm logged in nicolas to my machine, and if I do a "su root" or "su - root", and I send a mail, the sender will be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". It's a problem, because I done a "su" to be logged as root. I don't have this problem with a FreeBSD/Postfix. Thanks for your advices and helps. I don't understand this problem. Regards, -- - Nicolas. That is exactly working as designed. The reason sendmail sends the mail as your actual login user is so you cannot spoof so easily. If you have certain emails like system reports you are sending and want them sent as root, add them to roots crontab file. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: quota and sendmail accepts <10k mail size
At 08:14 PM 7/7/2008, lyd mc wrote: Greetings, I setup my mail server on freebsd7.0R and it is working great! However, I have a problem on quota. It suppose to block any incoming message to specific user which is under quota. But sendmail can still send to the user under quota if the mail size is ~ less than 10k. Quota only works when the mail size is greater than 13k. Is there any way to correct this problem? Please help. By the way, i disable the grace period via quota.h. #define MAX_IQ_TIME (0) /* seconds in 1 week */ #define MAX_DQ_TIME (0) /* seconds in 1 week */ And my mail users authenticate via ldap. Thank you and more power. I don't fully understand what you are trying to limit, most sendmail size limits are set either globally, or by protocol. The General setting is set in you .mc file with: confMAX_MESSAGE_SIZEMaxMessageSize [infinite] The maximum size of messages that will be accepted (in bytes). Otherwise read through the page on the options here and you can refine the size limit by the protcol/mta: http://www.sendmail.org/documentation/configurationReadme -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Reconfiguring network interfaces
At 09:06 AM 7/6/2008, David Allen wrote: I need to make several wholesale changes to a few different systems, and I'd prefer to do it over SSH without losing connectivity where possible. I know I can use ifconfig, or edit /etc/rc.conf directly and reboot, but is there a canonical way to make the changes in /etc/rc.conf and "reload" those changes to ensure everything is in a known state? From what I can determine, running netif stop/start would work, but would require I do that locally. You pretty much need to be on the console rather than ssh'd in to make those changes interactively. You can do them remotely via a cron job or at job, but any mistake will require a trip to the console. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"