Re: Error while posing newly created or edited file using SVN

2013-05-08 Thread kvr
Thanks that solved the issue.

On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 12:47:06 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> You need to use "svn add" before you create your diff. You don't have to 
> do "svn commit".
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:15 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>> *
>> *
>> I have the similar problem.
>>
>> I want to review the files before adding them to svn repository( I want 
>> to do a pre-commit review for that) since I am getting nothing when I issue 
>> svn diff,how to upload diff in the reviewboard web interface for the newly 
>> created files.
>> Should I run svn add before generating svn diff ?
>> Please help.
>>
>> On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:36:35 PM UTC+5:30, Prashima wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to post two pre-commit reviews using post-review. One review 
>>> contains a newly added, unversioned SVN file and other review contains an 
>>> edited, versioned file. I am able to generate diff for the edited file and 
>>> upload that to a new review request, but not able to post it using 
>>> post-review. For newly added file I am simply not able to do anything 
>>> neither able to generate a diff nor able to use post-review. 
>>>
>>> I know similar 
>>> topic<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/reviewboard/HJa6fJgKkDA>has
>>>  been discussed long back, but things are not working for me at all.
>>>
>>> Following are the errors I am getting - (Please let me know if there is 
>>> any other log which I can attach apart from debug output)
>>>
>>> NEW FILE
>>> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite>**post-review -d src\main\java\edu\kite\**
>>> controller\ActivityController.**java
>>> >>> RBTools 0.5
>>> >>> Python 2.7.4 (default, Apr  6 2013, 19:54:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit 
>>> (Intel)]
>>> >>> Running on Windows-7-6.1.7600
>>> >>> Home = C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming
>>> >>> Current Directory = C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
>>> >>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Bazaar repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Plastic repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
>>> DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
>>> DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: 
>>> svn://www.kite-test.com/kite_**server<http://www.kite-test.com/kite_server>,
>>>  
>>> Base path: /Kite, Supports changesets: False
>>> >>> Finished checking the repository type.
>>> DEBUG:root:Running: svn propget reviewboard:url 
>>> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
>>> >>> HTTP GETting api/info/
>>> DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff src\main\java\edu\kite\**
>>> controller\ActivityController.**java
>>> Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff', 
>>> 'src\\main\\java\\edu\\kite\\**controller\\**ActivityController.java']
>>> ["svn: E15: 'C:\\Workspace\\Kite\\Server\\**
>>> Kite\\src\\main\\java\\edu\\**kite\\controller\\**ActivityController.java' 
>>> is not under version control\n"]
>>>
>>>
>>> EDITED FILE
>>>
>>> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite>**post-review -d src\main\java\edu\kite\**
>>> controller\TestController.java
>>> >>> RBTools 0.5
>>> >>> Python 2.7.4 (default, Apr  6 2013, 19:54:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit 
>>> (Intel)]
>>> >>> Running on Windows-7-6.1.7600
>>> >>> Home = C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming
>>> >>> Current Directory = C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
>>> >>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Bazaar repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
>>> DEB

Re: Error while posing newly created or edited file using SVN

2013-05-08 Thread kvr
Hi Christian,
*
*
I have the similar problem.

I want to review the files before adding them to svn repository( I want to 
do a pre-commit review for that) since I am getting nothing when I issue 
svn diff,how to upload diff in the reviewboard web interface for the newly 
created files.
Should I run svn add before generating svn diff ?
Please help.

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:36:35 PM UTC+5:30, Prashima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to post two pre-commit reviews using post-review. One review 
> contains a newly added, unversioned SVN file and other review contains an 
> edited, versioned file. I am able to generate diff for the edited file and 
> upload that to a new review request, but not able to post it using 
> post-review. For newly added file I am simply not able to do anything 
> neither able to generate a diff nor able to use post-review. 
>
> I know similar 
> topichas
>  been discussed long back, but things are not working for me at all.
>
> Following are the errors I am getting - (Please let me know if there is 
> any other log which I can attach apart from debug output)
>
> NEW FILE
> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite>post-review -d 
> src\main\java\edu\kite\controller\ActivityController.java
> >>> RBTools 0.5
> >>> Python 2.7.4 (default, Apr  6 2013, 19:54:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit 
> (Intel)]
> >>> Running on Windows-7-6.1.7600
> >>> Home = C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming
> >>> Current Directory = C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
> >>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Bazaar repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Plastic repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
> DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
> DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: svn://www.kite-test.com/kite_server, 
> Base path: /Kite, Supports changesets: False
> >>> Finished checking the repository type.
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn propget reviewboard:url 
> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
> >>> HTTP GETting api/info/
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff 
> src\main\java\edu\kite\controller\ActivityController.java
> Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff', 
> 'src\\main\\java\\edu\\kite\\controller\\ActivityController.java']
> ["svn: E15: 
> 'C:\\Workspace\\Kite\\Server\\Kite\\src\\main\\java\\edu\\kite\\controller\\ActivityController.java'
>  
> is not under version control\n"]
>
>
> EDITED FILE
>
> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite>post-review -d 
> src\main\java\edu\kite\controller\TestController.java
> >>> RBTools 0.5
> >>> Python 2.7.4 (default, Apr  6 2013, 19:54:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit 
> (Intel)]
> >>> Running on Windows-7-6.1.7600
> >>> Home = C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming
> >>> Current Directory = C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
> >>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Bazaar repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Plastic repository...
> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
> DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
> DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: svn://www.kite-test.com/kite_server, 
> Base path: /Kite, Supports changesets: False
> >>> Finished checking the repository type.
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn propget reviewboard:url 
> C:\Workspace\Kite\Server\Kite
> >>> HTTP GETting api/info/
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff 
> src\main\java\edu\kite\controller\TestController.java
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info 
> src/main/java/edu/kite/controller/TestController.java
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info src/main/java/edu/kite/controller
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info src/main/java/edu/kite
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info src/main/java/edu
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info src/main/java
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info src/main
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info src
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info 
> src/main/java/edu/kite/controller/TestController.java
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info 
> src/main/java/edu/kite/controller/TestController.java
> DEBUG:root:Running: svn info 
> src/main/java/edu/kite/controller/TestController.java
> >>> HTTP GETting api/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://reviewboard.kitesystems.com/api/info/
> >>> Using the new web API
> >>> HTTP GETting http://reviewboard.kitesystems.com/api/repositories/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://reviewboard.kitesystems.com/api/repositories/1/
> >>> HTTP GETtin

Re: Reviewboard 1.7.7.1 - getting error while accessing admin page

2013-04-25 Thread kvr
Try commenting widgets at admin/widgets.py

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:10:16 AM UTC+5:30, Prashima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> (Apologies if this is duplicate post, I don't see my previous post on the 
> group)
>
> I have recently installed reviewboard. Things were going fine, with my 
> site up and running. I was even able to make some admin configurations, but 
> soon I started getting the standard "Error 500 somehting is broken!" error 
> while accessing the admin page. Since then I haven't been able to access 
> the admin page. I am able to access all other pages.
>
>
> OS : CentOS 6.3
> Python : 2.6.6
> Django : 1.4.5
> Browser : tested with Firefox, Chrome, IE
>
>
> Attached the relevant error log. Please let me know if any other 
> information is required. 
>
> Partial trace:
>
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] too many values to unpack
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] Traceback (most recent call last):
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py",
>  
> line 111, in get_response
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] response = callback(request, 
> *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/admin/views/decorators.py",
>  
> line 16, in _checklogin
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return view_func(request, *args, 
> **kwargs)
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.7.1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/views.py",
>  
> line 33, in dashboard
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] 'secondary_widgets': 
> secondary_widgets,
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/shortcuts/__init__.py",
>  
> line 20, in render_to_response
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return 
> HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args, **kwargs), 
> **httpresponse_kwargs)
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/loader.py",
>  
> line 171, in render_to_string
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return t.render(Context(dictionary))
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error]   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg/django/template/base.py",
>  
> line 140, in render
> [Wed Apr 24 09:07:51 2013] [error] return self._render(context)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Prashima
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-24 Thread kvr
I have tried with http:// and my port is a default port(80).
I am running behind proxy,is this the cause?

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:28:28 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>
> My server's IP address,xxx.xxx.xx.xx.
> Tried with prefixing http:// also, but no use.
>
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:26:42 PM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>
>> That's odd...
>>
>> In the settings, what do you have as the Review Board base URL?
>>
>> - Kiro
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:35 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>
>> I am also getting just spinning icon.
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:50:55 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Kiro, it worked.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's not in the Chrome Web store yet.
>>>>
>>>> But, you can install it by downloading the *.crx* file at 
>>>> https://github.com/krisk/rbn/blob/master/package/rbn.crx, open 
>>>> chrome://extensions on your browser, and drag the *.crx* file into it.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you encounter any problems.
>>>>
>>>> - Kiro
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, 22 April 2013 03:58:14 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How to get it?
>>>>> I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kiro,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very cool!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are the icons in the upper right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey everyone!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  *Features:*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, 
>>>>>>>whether they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship 
>>>>>>>it*
>>>>>>>- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>>>>>>>- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>>>>>>>- Configurable via the settings page
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Screenshots:*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JIBwdna5Pso/UXHMoITr7eI/G0o/3QNhzGqN1po/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+3.54.03+PM.png>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Lz-NmhJCzPA/UXHNSGlCA7I/G04/fB8AWAAchRU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+4.03.15+PM.png>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-24 Thread kvr
My server's IP address,xxx.xxx.xx.xx.
Tried with prefixing http:// also, but no use.

On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:26:42 PM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>
> That's odd...
>
> In the settings, what do you have as the Review Board base URL?
>
> - Kiro
>
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 4:35 AM, kvr > wrote:
>
> I am also getting just spinning icon.
>
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:50:55 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Kiro, it worked.
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not in the Chrome Web store yet.
>>>
>>> But, you can install it by downloading the *.crx* file at 
>>> https://github.com/krisk/rbn/blob/master/package/rbn.crx, open 
>>> chrome://extensions on your browser, and drag the *.crx* file into it.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you encounter any problems.
>>>
>>> - Kiro
>>>
>>> On Monday, 22 April 2013 03:58:14 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How to get it?
>>>> I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Kiro,
>>>>>
>>>>> Very cool!
>>>>>
>>>>> What are the icons in the upper right?
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey everyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *Features:*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, 
>>>>>>whether they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship 
>>>>>>it*
>>>>>>- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>>>>>>- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>>>>>>- Configurable via the settings page
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Screenshots:*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JIBwdna5Pso/UXHMoITr7eI/G0o/3QNhzGqN1po/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+3.54.03+PM.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Lz-NmhJCzPA/UXHNSGlCA7I/G04/fB8AWAAchRU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+4.03.15+PM.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
&g

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-23 Thread kvr
I am also getting just spinning icon.

On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:50:55 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>
> Thanks Kiro, it worked.
>
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>
>> It's not in the Chrome Web store yet.
>>
>> But, you can install it by downloading the *.crx* file at 
>> https://github.com/krisk/rbn/blob/master/package/rbn.crx, open 
>> chrome://extensions on your browser, and drag the *.crx* file into it.
>>
>> Let me know if you encounter any problems.
>>
>> - Kiro
>>
>> On Monday, 22 April 2013 03:58:14 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>>>
>>> How to get it?
>>> I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Kiro,
>>>>
>>>> Very cool!
>>>>
>>>> What are the icons in the upper right?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey everyone!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:
>>>>>
>>>>>  *Features:*
>>>>>
>>>>>- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, 
>>>>>whether they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it
>>>>>*
>>>>>- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>>>>>- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>>>>>- Configurable via the settings page
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Screenshots:*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JIBwdna5Pso/UXHMoITr7eI/G0o/3QNhzGqN1po/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+3.54.03+PM.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Lz-NmhJCzPA/UXHNSGlCA7I/G04/fB8AWAAchRU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+4.03.15+PM.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn
>>>>>
>>>>> - Kiro
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-23 Thread kvr
Thanks Kiro, it worked.

On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>
> It's not in the Chrome Web store yet.
>
> But, you can install it by downloading the *.crx* file at 
> https://github.com/krisk/rbn/blob/master/package/rbn.crx, open 
> chrome://extensions on your browser, and drag the *.crx* file into it.
>
> Let me know if you encounter any problems.
>
> - Kiro
>
> On Monday, 22 April 2013 03:58:14 UTC-7, kvr wrote:
>>
>> How to get it?
>> I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.
>>
>> On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>>
>>> Kiro,
>>>
>>> Very cool!
>>>
>>> What are the icons in the upper right?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone!
>>>>
>>>> Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:
>>>>
>>>>  *Features:*
>>>>
>>>>- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether 
>>>>they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it*
>>>>- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>>>>- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>>>>- Configurable via the settings page
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Screenshots:*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JIBwdna5Pso/UXHMoITr7eI/G0o/3QNhzGqN1po/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+3.54.03+PM.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Lz-NmhJCzPA/UXHNSGlCA7I/G04/fB8AWAAchRU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+4.03.15+PM.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn
>>>>
>>>> - Kiro
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-22 Thread kvr
How to get it?
I Could not find it in Chrome Web store.

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:05:49 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Kiro,
>
> Very cool!
>
> What are the icons in the upper right?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone!
>>
>> Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:
>>
>>  *Features:*
>>
>>- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether 
>>they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it*
>>- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>>- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>>- Configurable via the settings page
>>
>>
>> *Screenshots:*
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn
>>
>> - Kiro
>>
>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: SVN integration

2013-04-09 Thread kvr
Thanks David

On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 1:59:18 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Yes, each SVN repository needs a different entry in the reviewboard admin 
> UI.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:22 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Thanks David, I would try that.
>>
>> How to add multiple SVN repositories present under same host.Does every 
>> repository need a separate entry in the Review Board admin UI?
>>
>> In perforce we just give the P4PORT so that reviews can be performed in 
>> all the depots under that host.
>>
>> Is it possible to configure SVN also like Perforce.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, April 6, 2013 6:28:25 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>>> We currently have an open issue where it doesn't detect the right 
>>> environment. The best way to fix this (which admittedly is pretty terrible) 
>>> is to change the order of things in load_scmclients in 
>>> rbtools/clients/__init__.py
>>>
>>> We'll have a better way to fix this coming soon.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:58 PM, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks David for your reply.
>>>> Now I am trying to post review request on SVN repository.
>>>> I used below command to post,
>>>>
>>>> post-review -d --server http://xxx.xxx.xx.xx --repository-url SVN_151 
>>>> --username=xx --password=xx --revision-range=x:x
>>>>
>>>> But post-review is identifying my repository as Perforce repository and 
>>>> running "p4 info"
>>>> Below is the debug info,
>>>>
>>>> >>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly 
>>>> harmless.
>>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
>>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
>>>> DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool pwv -short
>>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
>>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
>>>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
>>>> DEBUG:root:Running: p4 info
>>>> DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
>>>> Please tell me what may be possible reason for this and how to point to 
>>>> SVN repository in this case.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> kvr
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, April 5, 2013 5:27:44 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sure, that's possible. You just make changes to your working directory 
>>>>> in svn, use rbtools (or 'svn diff') to create your diffs, and go through 
>>>>> the code review process the same way.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only major difference is that when you're using rbtools to update 
>>>>> an existing review request, you need to specify the review request ID, 
>>>>> since there's no CLN->review request mapping like there is with perforce.
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far we've been using Perforce, now we need to integrate with SVN 
>>>>>> also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I am bit confused with SVN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible to raise review requests in SVN on pre-commited code 
>>>>>> like we do in Perforce.if so how.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In perforce the review cycle seems very simple,as below
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Check out->Raise Review->Get comments->Update source according to the 
>>>>>> Comments->Update the Review->Close the Review(Changes are fine)->Check 
>>>>>> in 
>>>>>> the code back to Perforce
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please tell me how to do the same kind of review in SVN also, if 
>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> kvr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**don**ate/<http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/>
>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**use**rs/<http://www.reviewboard.org/users/>
>>>>>> -~

Re: SVN integration

2013-04-09 Thread kvr
Thanks David, I would try that.

How to add multiple SVN repositories present under same host.Does every 
repository need a separate entry in the Review Board admin UI?

In perforce we just give the P4PORT so that reviews can be performed in all 
the depots under that host.

Is it possible to configure SVN also like Perforce.

On Saturday, April 6, 2013 6:28:25 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> We currently have an open issue where it doesn't detect the right 
> environment. The best way to fix this (which admittedly is pretty terrible) 
> is to change the order of things in load_scmclients in 
> rbtools/clients/__init__.py
>
> We'll have a better way to fix this coming soon.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:58 PM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Thanks David for your reply.
>> Now I am trying to post review request on SVN repository.
>> I used below command to post,
>>
>> post-review -d --server http://xxx.xxx.xx.xx --repository-url SVN_151 
>> --username=xx --password=xx --revision-range=x:x
>>
>> But post-review is identifying my repository as Perforce repository and 
>> running "p4 info"
>> Below is the debug info,
>>
>> >>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
>> DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool pwv -short
>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
>> DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
>> DEBUG:root:Running: p4 info
>> DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
>> Please tell me what may be possible reason for this and how to point to 
>> SVN repository in this case.
>>
>> Regards,
>> kvr
>>
>> On Friday, April 5, 2013 5:27:44 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>>> Sure, that's possible. You just make changes to your working directory 
>>> in svn, use rbtools (or 'svn diff') to create your diffs, and go through 
>>> the code review process the same way.
>>>
>>> The only major difference is that when you're using rbtools to update an 
>>> existing review request, you need to specify the review request ID, since 
>>> there's no CLN->review request mapping like there is with perforce.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> So far we've been using Perforce, now we need to integrate with SVN 
>>>> also.
>>>>
>>>> But I am bit confused with SVN.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to raise review requests in SVN on pre-commited code 
>>>> like we do in Perforce.if so how.
>>>>
>>>> In perforce the review cycle seems very simple,as below
>>>>
>>>> Check out->Raise Review->Get comments->Update source according to the 
>>>> Comments->Update the Review->Close the Review(Changes are fine)->Check in 
>>>> the code back to Perforce
>>>>
>>>> Please tell me how to do the same kind of review in SVN also, if 
>>>> possible.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> kvr
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/<http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/>
>>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/<http://www.reviewboard.org/users/>
>>>> -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@**
>>>> googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>> group/reviewboard?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to reviewboard...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/dona

Re: Problem in installation of RBTools

2013-04-04 Thread kvr
Try setting Proxy address, if you are using one.

On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 3:04:32 PM UTC+5:30, SHWETA AHER wrote:
>
> Hello,
>I have successfully installed Python2.5 and setuptools, but still 
> am getting following errors while installing RBtools.
>
>
> C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32>easy_install -U RBTools
> Searching for RBTools
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/
> Download error: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') -- Some packages may not be 
> found!
>
> Couldn't find index page for 'RBTools' (maybe misspelled?)
> Scanning index of all packages (this may take a while)
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/
> Download error: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') -- Some packages may not be 
> found!
>
> No local packages or download links found for RBTools
> Best match: None
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "C:\Python25\Scripts\easy_install-script.py", line 8, in 
> load_entry_point('setuptools==0.6c11', 'console_scripts', 
> 'easy_install')()
>   File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\setuptools\command\easy_install.py", 
> line
> 1712, in main
> with_ei_usage(lambda:
>   File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\setuptools\command\easy_install.py", 
> line
> 1700, in with_ei_usage
> return f()
>   File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\setuptools\command\easy_install.py", 
> line
> 1716, in 
> distclass=DistributionWithoutHelpCommands, **kw
>   File "C:\Python25\lib\distutils\core.py", line 151, in setup
> dist.run_commands()
>   File "C:\Python25\lib\distutils\dist.py", line 974, in run_commands
> self.run_command(cmd)
>   File "C:\Python25\lib\distutils\dist.py", line 994, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\setuptools\command\easy_install.py", 
> line
> 211, in run
> self.easy_install(spec, not self.no_deps)
>   File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\setuptools\command\easy_install.py", 
> line
> 434, in easy_install
> self.local_index
>   File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\setuptools\package_index.py", line 
> 475, in
>  fetch_distribution
> return dist.clone(location=self.download(dist.location, tmpdir))
> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'clone'
>
> Please help.
> Thanks!
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: SVN integration

2013-04-04 Thread kvr
Thanks David for your reply.
Now I am trying to post review request on SVN repository.
I used below command to post,

post-review -d --server http://xxx.xxx.xx.xx --repository-url SVN_151 
--username=xx --password=xx --revision-range=x:x

But post-review is identifying my repository as Perforce repository and 
running "p4 info"
Below is the debug info,

>>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
DEBUG:root:Checking for a CVS repository...
DEBUG:root:Checking for a ClearCase repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: cleartool pwv -short
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Mercurial repository...
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: p4 info
DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
Please tell me what may be possible reason for this and how to point to SVN 
repository in this case.

Regards,
kvr
On Friday, April 5, 2013 5:27:44 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Sure, that's possible. You just make changes to your working directory in 
> svn, use rbtools (or 'svn diff') to create your diffs, and go through the 
> code review process the same way.
>
> The only major difference is that when you're using rbtools to update an 
> existing review request, you need to specify the review request ID, since 
> there's no CLN->review request mapping like there is with perforce.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:34 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So far we've been using Perforce, now we need to integrate with SVN also.
>>
>> But I am bit confused with SVN.
>>
>> Is it possible to raise review requests in SVN on pre-commited code like 
>> we do in Perforce.if so how.
>>
>> In perforce the review cycle seems very simple,as below
>>
>> Check out->Raise Review->Get comments->Update source according to the 
>> Comments->Update the Review->Close the Review(Changes are fine)->Check in 
>> the code back to Perforce
>>
>> Please tell me how to do the same kind of review in SVN also, if possible.
>>
>> Regards,
>> kvr
>>
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




SVN integration

2013-04-04 Thread kvr
Hi,

So far we've been using Perforce, now we need to integrate with SVN also.

But I am bit confused with SVN.

Is it possible to raise review requests in SVN on pre-commited code like we 
do in Perforce.if so how.

In perforce the review cycle seems very simple,as below

Check out->Raise Review->Get comments->Update source according to the 
Comments->Update the Review->Close the Review(Changes are fine)->Check in 
the code back to Perforce

Please tell me how to do the same kind of review in SVN also, if possible.

Regards,
kvr

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Lines added,modified

2013-03-26 Thread kvr
Thanks for your update Christian .

On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:46:29 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you install diffstat (a third-party command line tool), you can run it 
> on the diff and get info like that.
>
> RB 1.8 will have this available in the API.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 23:42, kvr > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody give me a hint, how to get number of lines added and modified 
> data while creating review request from Postreview in Perforce.
>
> Regards,
> kvr
>
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Lines added,modified

2013-03-25 Thread kvr
Hi,

Can somebody give me a hint, how to get number of lines added and modified 
data while creating review request from Postreview in Perforce.

Regards,
kvr

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Getting 404 (NOT FOUND) while saving review comment

2013-03-22 Thread kvr
Thanks for your reply.

Hope it does not break any thing in my review request.

On Friday, March 22, 2013 2:27:50 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Yes, that's currently expected. We don't intend to allow commenting on 
> diffs before the review request is public, but we have a long-standing bug 
> where it's allowed. Hopefully we'll fix that sometime soon, but for now, 
> you have to publish first.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:49 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are using Review Board 1.7.1 
>>
>> I am getting "404 not found" error while giving the diff comment and 
>> before publishing it.But the comment is getting saved.
>>
>> Below is the API call it is making.
>>
>>
>> http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/review-requests/13/reviews/draft/?api_format=json
>>
>> I guessed this is not the valid API URL,so tried below URL but it throws 
>> Page not found.
>>
>> http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/review-requests/13/reviews/41/draft/
>>
>>
>> Any clues to resolve this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> kvr
>>
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Getting 404 (NOT FOUND) while saving review comment

2013-03-21 Thread kvr
Hi,

We are using Review Board 1.7.1 

I am getting "404 not found" error while giving the diff comment and before 
publishing it.But the comment is getting saved.

Below is the API call it is making.

http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/review-requests/13/reviews/draft/?api_format=json

I guessed this is not the valid API URL,so tried below URL but it throws 
Page not found.

http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/review-requests/13/reviews/41/draft/


Any clues to resolve this?

Regards,
kvr

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Upgrade from 1.5.7 to 1.7.0.1

2013-03-13 Thread kvr
I have just done normal upgrade but it installed django-pipeline-1.3.6 and 
django-pipeline-1.3.6 caused this error, after installing 1.2.17 or 1.7.22, 
it got fixed.

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:01:32 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> How did you upgrade Review Board? The proper, supported version should 
> have been taken care of for you (and lessc should never be invoked).
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com 
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 11:30 PM, kvr > wrote:
>
>
> Resolved this by installing django-pipeline version-1.2.17
>
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:17:44 AM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> We are upgrading our Review Board 1.5.7 to 1.7.0.1.
>>
>> Upgrade was successful but while accessing the site, we encountered the 
>> following error.
>>
>> CompilerError at /dashboard/
>>
>> /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory
>>
>> This points to {% compressed_css "admin" %} in templates/admin/base.html
>>
>> Please help me to solve this.
>>
>> Regards,
>> kvr
>>
>
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Upgrade from 1.5.7 to 1.7.0.1

2013-03-12 Thread kvr

Resolved this by installing django-pipeline version-1.2.17

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:17:44 AM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> We are upgrading our Review Board 1.5.7 to 1.7.0.1.
>
> Upgrade was successful but while accessing the site, we encountered the 
> following error.
>
> CompilerError at /dashboard/
>
> /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory
>
> This points to {% compressed_css "admin" %} in templates/admin/base.html
>
> Please help me to solve this.
>
> Regards,
> kvr
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Upgrade from 1.5.7 to 1.7.0.1

2013-03-12 Thread kvr
Hi ,

We are upgrading our Review Board 1.5.7 to 1.7.0.1.

Upgrade was successful but while accessing the site, we encountered the 
following error.

CompilerError at /dashboard/

/usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory

This points to {% compressed_css "admin" %} in templates/admin/base.html

Please help me to solve this.

Regards,
kvr

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: ANN: Custom Reports Extension

2013-02-23 Thread kvr
Thak you Raja !

It will be very helpful.

Regards,
ram

On Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:50:12 PM UTC+5:30, Raja wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Ive created an extension that allows custom reports in Reviewboard. 
> Currently, the supported reports are
>
>- Review Requests not Reviewed by anyone
>- Review Requests that are not Reviewed by me
>- Review Requests that have a Ship-It but not Submitted.
>- Filter ReviewRequests by Repositories that a user has access to.
>
> I basically picked up a few tickets that wanted this functionality (bug #: 
> 2355, 2049 and one of our own needs) to create the above reports. Since not 
> everyone would want all of these reports, the extension has a 
> "Configuration" page that allows the admin to pick and choose which of the 
> reports needs to appear on dashboard pages. At this point, the selected 
> reports will be visible to all users of reviewboard. In the future, this 
> may include groups or users who may want to see certain reports, but those 
> will not be available for other users of the system.
>
> You can see a README of this at 
> https://github.com/rajasaur/rb-extension-pack/tree/master/rbcustomreports. 
> This page contains the steps to install it.
>
> Im also planning to setup a custom RB instance (on cloudfoundry or heroku) 
> where the plugins are installed (I also converted a RSS Feed codebase 
> contributed by Dolanor into an extension) . You could test-drive them there 
> before trying it in your own install.  Ill post here when I have that setup.
>
> Regards
> Raja
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




AssertionError at /api/review-requests/1/draft/

2013-02-05 Thread kvr
Hi,
We are working on adding a new review detail field, called project.
We have defined our project model and mapped the reviewrequest detail and 
reviewrequest detail draft models with foreignkey relation.
But while selecting the project from review details page, we are getting 
assertion error.
We have done code changes in resources.py,reviews.js to call draft api on 
selecting project .
Any clue to resolve this error?
here is my error trace.
 
AssertionError at /api/review-requests/1/draft/

No exception supplied

Request Method:GETRequest URL:
http://127.0.0.1:8050/api/review-requests/1/draft/Django Version:1.4.3Exception 
Type:AssertionErrorException 
Location:/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py
 
in serialize_object, line 917Python Executable:/usr/bin/python2.7

Traceback:
>
> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py" 
>> in get_response
>
>   111. response = callback(request, 
>> *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/views/decorators/cache.py" 
>> in _wrapped_view_func
>
>   89. response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/views/decorators/vary.py" in 
>> inner_func
>
>   19. response = func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py"
>>  
>> in __call__
>
>   461. result = view(request, api_format=api_format, *args, 
>> **kwargs)
>
> File "/root/Downloads/board/reviewboard/webapi/decorators.py" in _check
>
>   127. return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py"
>>  
>> in _checklogin
>
>   88. return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/decorators.py"
>>  
>> in _call
>
>   75. f = augmented_func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File "/root/Downloads/board/reviewboard/webapi/decorators.py" in _check
>
>   32. return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/decorators.py"
>>  
>> in _call
>
>   75. f = augmented_func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/decorators.py"
>>  
>> in _call
>
>   62. return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py"
>>  
>> in get
>
>   716. *args, 
>> **kwargs),
>
> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/resources.py"
>>  
>> in serialize_object
>
>   917. assert resource
>
>
>> Exception Type: AssertionError at /api/review-requests/1/draft/
>
> Exception Value: 
>
>
>



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Review Board 1.7.0.1 released

2012-12-17 Thread kvr
Thanks Christian ! that fixed the issue.

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Thanks. Looks like we had a bug in how we computed version strings (the 0 
> in 1.7.0.1 threw off something). It's fixed now.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Bruce Cran 
> > wrote:
>
>> The homepage points to 1.7.1 (resulting in a 404), not 1.7.0.1.
>>
>> -- 
>> Bruce Cran
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




Re: 500 while adding repository

2012-12-17 Thread kvr

Same error we are also facing ..

On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:06:34 PM UTC+5:30, Shib S wrote:
>
> ActivePython-2.7
> CentOS 5.8
> ReviewBoard 1.7
>
> Kindly help !
>
>
> 2012-12-17 16:30:44,007 - ERROR - Exception thrown for user admin at 
> http://reviewb.example.com/admin/db/scmtools/repository/add/
>
> 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_name'
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py",
>  
> line 111, in get_response
> response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/options.py",
>  
> line 366, in wrapper
> return self.admin_site.admin_view(view)(*args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 91, in _wrapped_view
> response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/views/decorators/cache.py",
>  
> line 89, in _wrapped_view_func
> response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/sites.py",
>  
> line 196, in inner
> return view(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 25, in _wrapper
> return bound_func(*args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 91, in _wrapped_view
> response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 21, in bound_func
> return func(self, *args2, **kwargs2)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/db/transaction.py",
>  
> line 209, in inner
> return func(*args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/options.py",
>  
> line 970, in add_view
> form = ModelForm(initial=initial)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/forms.py",
>  
> line 250, in __init__
> ssh_key.get_name(),
> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_name'
> 2012-12-17 16:30:44,344 - ERROR - Internal Server Error: 
> /admin/db/scmtools/repository/add/
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py",
>  
> line 111, in get_response
> response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/options.py",
>  
> line 366, in wrapper
> return self.admin_site.admin_view(view)(*args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 91, in _wrapped_view
> response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/views/decorators/cache.py",
>  
> line 89, in _wrapped_view_func
> response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/sites.py",
>  
> line 196, in inner
> return view(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 25, in _wrapper
> return bound_func(*args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 91, in _wrapped_view
> response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py",
>  
> line 21, in bound_func
> return func(self, *args2, **kwargs2)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/db/transaction.py",
>  
> line 209, in inner
> return func(*args, **kwargs)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/options.py",
>  
> line 970, in add_view
> form = ModelForm(initial=initial)
>   File 
> "/opt/ActivePython-2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/forms.py",
>  
> line 250, in __init__
> ssh_key.get_name(),
> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_name'
>  

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-09 Thread kvr
Thanks ! , that resolved the issue ,but UI is not proper.

On Saturday, December 8, 2012 5:19:51 PM UTC+5:30, Vishal Gautam wrote:
>
> That worked!!! Installed the latest Djblets 0.7.6 and it worked. 
>
> Thank you so much Chris!
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> If you upgrade Djblets to what's in Git, this will go away. I'll see 
>> about doing another Djblets release tonight, though, to fix it.
>>
>> As soon as we finish docs, 1.7 will be released.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:21, Vishal Gautam > 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Turned Debug=True, now i see this  ... any pointers?
>>
>> Traceback:
>> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py"
>>  
>> in get_response
>>   89. response = middleware_method(request)
>> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/middleware.py"
>>  
>> in process_request
>>44. load_site_config()
>> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/siteconfig.py"
>>  
>> in load_site_config
>>   215. apply_django_settings(siteconfig, settings_map)
>> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py"
>>  
>> in apply_django_settings
>>   210. setter(settings, setting_key, value)
>> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py"
>>  
>> in _set_cache_backend
>>   48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
>> File 
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py"
>>  
>> in parse_backend_uri
>>   58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:
>>
>> Exception Type: AttributeError at /
>> Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond 
>> 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log 
>>> you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else 
>>> causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log 
>>> file?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam > 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), 
>>> spent entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated 
>>> the site with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be 
>>> an issue I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and 
>>> recreated the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is 
>>> RB 1.7 not compatible with Python 2.6?
>>>
>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
>>> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
>>>  
>>> DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
>>> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
>>>  
>>> DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use 
>>> class-based views instead.
>>> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>> wrote:

 Hi,

 First, do you have a backup of the database?

 What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For 
 example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an 
 upgrade?

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam wrote:

> Thanks for the response Chris!
>
> I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded 
> setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine 
> (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am 
> stuck at upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please 
> help!
>
> [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
> reviews.xxx..com
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database. This may take a while.
> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**
> egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5 
> module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
>   from md5 import md5
> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**
> linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not 
> using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp >= 5 to avoid timing 
> attack vulnerability.
> Creating tables .

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-11-30 Thread kvr
Hi,

Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors.
Debug info shows below.
NameError at /

global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined


Request Method:GETRequest URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/Django 
Version:1.4.2Exception 
Type:NameErrorException Value:

global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined

Exception 
Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py
 
in _set_cache_backend, line 47Python Executable:C:\Python27\python.exePython 
Version:2.7.3
 
Any clue to fix this?


On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote:
>
> Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
> One question I have is about RBTools?
>
> I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
> Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same 
> time?
>
> Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as 
> the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or 
> later)
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Review Board "Better Late Than Never" 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to 
>> get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some 
>> production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was 
>> worth the wait :)
>>
>> There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface 
>> changes in this release.
>>
>> See the news and release notes for more information.
>>
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/
>>
>> We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a 
>> try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made 
>> until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




LDAP issue

2012-11-27 Thread kvr
Hi,

I'm facing some issue while configuring LDAP to my Review Board-1.5.7 on 
Ubuntu-11.04.

Review board log shows below error.

ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing authentication backend 
reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend: "cannot import name Department"


Please help


Regards,

KVR

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




Re: post-review: HTTP 500 error

2012-11-23 Thread kvr
Hi ,

I am also facing the similar problem while posting review request, but my 
Review board is running in Ubuntu.

Review Board version:1.5.7
Rbtools version:0.3.2
python version:2.7 

Got HTTP error: 500: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>


http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">



500 - Internal Server Error | Review Board





Something broke! (Error 500)



It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either

a bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please report

this to your administrator.








Error creating review request: HTTP 500

Please help me on this.

Thanks
KVR
On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 4:46:31 AM UTC+5:30, Zamir Khan wrote:
>
> So I've gotten to another point, with a new error, so I figured I 
> should start a new thread. Here is where I am getting to trying to run 
> post-review from the client: 
>
> C:\>post-review 2480 -d --p4-passwd= --server 
> http:///reviewboard/ 
> >>> RBTools 0.3.3 
> >>> Home =  
> >>> p4 info 
> >>> repository info: Path: , Base path: None, Suppor 
> s changesets: True 
> >>> HTTP GETting api/ 
> >>> HTTP GETting /reviewboard/api/info/ 
> >>> Using the new web API 
> >>> Generating diff for changenum 2480 
> >>> p4 -P  describe -s 2480 
> >>> 
>
> snipped out all the diff-creation 
>
> >>> Attempting to create review request on  for 2480 
> >>> HTTP POSTing to /reviewboard/api/review-req 
> ests/: {'changenum': '2480', 'repository': '} 
> ==> HTTP Authentication Required 
> Enter authorization information for "Web API" at  
> Username: zkhan 
> Password: 
> >>> Got HTTP error: 500:  Transitio 
> al//EN" 
>  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> 
>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> 
>   
>   500 - Internal Server Error | Review Board 
>   
>   
>   Something broke! (Error 500) 
>
>It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is 
> either 
>a bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please 
> report 
>this to your administrator. 
>
>   
>  
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




Extension generator throwing exception

2012-10-10 Thread kvr
Hi,
I'm trying to generate an extension using extension_generator.py but it is 
throwing the following exception>

*jinja2.exceptions.TemplateNotFound: 
extension/templates/extension/dashboard.html*

But actually that template is present there.
Any hint?

Regards,
kvr

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Exchange server for email

2012-10-09 Thread kvr
Hi,

Can exchange server be used to configure email in Review board?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-10-02 Thread kvr
Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing *jsmin*  ...

On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-10-02 Thread kvr
t modified)
Skipping 'admin/img/icon-yes.gif' (not modified)
Skipping 'admin/img/inline-restore.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'admin/img/icon-no.gif' (not modified)
Skipping 'admin/img/gis/move_vertex_off.png' (not modified)
Skipping 'admin/img/gis/move_vertex_on.png' (not modified)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 19, in 
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg/django/core/management/__init__.py",
 
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg/django/core/management/base.py",
 
line 232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg/django/core/management/base.py",
 
line 371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
 
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg/pipeline/storage.py",
 
line 30, in post_process
packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg/pipeline/packager.py",
 
line 90, in pack_stylesheets
variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg/pipeline/packager.py",
 
line 99, in pack
paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg/pipeline/packager.py",
 
line 93, in compile
return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force)
  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py",
 
line 41, in compile
compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated, force=force)
TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated'

Please provide some solution.

On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 2:12:16 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> There should be more than this. There should be some output from the 
> script being run.
>
> Run ./contrib/internal/build-media.py manually and see what happens.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, kvr >wrote:
>
>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py", 
>> line 172, in run
>> self.run_command("egg_info")
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
>> cmd_obj.run()
>>   File "setup.py", line 63, in run
>> self.run_command('build_media')
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
>> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
>> cmd_obj.run()
>>   File "setup.py", line 81, in run
>> raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
>>
>> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
>>
>> These are last few lines of the exception thrown during building egg in 
>> Ubuntu.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:37 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to 
>>> give you any information on a fix.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>> No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while 
>>> building the media files in Ubuntu also.
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
>>>> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>&

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-09-30 Thread kvr
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py", 
line 172, in run
self.run_command("egg_info")
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File "setup.py", line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files

These are last few lines of the exception thrown during building egg in 
Ubuntu.

On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:37 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to 
> give you any information on a fix.
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr > wrote:
>
> No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building 
> the media files in Ubuntu also.
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
>> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things 
>>> that must be installed in order to build the package.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>  
>>
>>> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>>>
>>  
>>  setup.py bdist_egg
>>
>> And the result is given below.
>>
>> running bdist_egg
>> running egg_info
>> running build_media
>> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 
>>
>>>
>>> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>>>
>>  
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>>>
>>> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
>>>> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to 
>>>>> install from source.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review 
>>>>>> Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, 
>>>>>> but 
>>>>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>>>>>> 17-beta-1-released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a 
>>>>>> beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any 
>>>>>> testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>>>>>> higher-quality release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>>>> VMware, Inc. - h

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-09-28 Thread kvr
No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building 
the media files in Ubuntu also.

On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build 
> infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr > wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things 
>> that must be installed in order to build the package.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>  
>
>> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>>
>  
>  setup.py bdist_egg
>
> And the result is given below.
>
> running bdist_egg
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 
>
>>
>> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>>
>  
>
>> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr  wrote:
>>
>> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>>
>> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>>
>> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
>>> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>
>>>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to 
>>>> install from source.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review 
>>>>> Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, 
>>>>> but 
>>>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>>>>> 17-beta-1-released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
>>>>> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
>>>>> would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>>>>> higher-quality release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>>  -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-09-27 Thread kvr


On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
wrote:
>
> Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things 
> that must be installed in order to build the package.
>
> Christian
>
 

> I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
>
 
 setup.py bdist_egg

And the result is given below.

running bdist_egg
running egg_info
running build_media
error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application 

>
> But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
>
 

> On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr > wrote:
>
> May I know how did you make the egg file?
>
> Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
>
> On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
>> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
>>> from source.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
>>>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
>>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>>>> 17-beta-1-released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/>
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
>>>> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
>>>> would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>>>> higher-quality release.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>>
>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-09-26 Thread kvr
May I know how did you make the egg file?

Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.

On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
wrote:
>
> In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 
> dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
>> from source.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
>>> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
>>> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>>>
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
>>> 17-beta-1-released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/>
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, 
>>> so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing 
>>> would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a 
>>> higher-quality release.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Add Perforce repository error

2012-09-14 Thread kvr
I am also facing the same problem.
Could some one please help?
here is my apache log:

File does not exist: C:/wamp/www/reviewboard.com/htdocs/media/djblets

On Monday, October 31, 2011 8:55:02 AM UTC+5:30, thegreendroid wrote:
>
> Can anyone help? Please? 
>
> On Oct 27, 6:20 pm, thegreendroid  wrote: 
> > Disregard the previous message, that exception was thrown when I had 
> > nothing specified in the path field. If I have everything populated 
> > correctly, I still get the same error (but nothing is logged in the 
> > web server's logs or in Reviewboard's logs)  - 
> > "Please correct the error below. 
> > DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found." 
> > 
> > Here's some more information about my Reviewboard install - 
> > 
> > Python 2.7.2 
> > Reviewboard 1.6.1 
> > memcached x86 1.2.6 
> > python-memcached-1.47 
> > flup-1.0.3.dev_20110111-py2.7 
> > Django-1.3.1 
> > Djblets-0.6.13-py2.7 
> > django_evolution-0.6.5 
> > MySQL-python-1.2.3.win32-py2.7 
> > paramiko-1.7.7.1 
> > PIL-1.1.7 
> > pycrypto-2.3 
> > Pygments-1.4-py2.7 
> > python-dateutil-1.5 
> > pytz-2011k-py2.7 
> > RBTools-0.3.4-py2.7 
> > recaptcha-client-1.0.6 
> > 
> > MySQL 5.5 x86 Community Edition 
> > Apache 2.2.21 x86 with mod_wsgi-win32-ap22py27-3.3 
> > 
> > I'd really appreciate your help as I'm close to pulling my hair out! 
> > 
> > On Oct 27, 6:03 pm, thegreendroid  wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Yes I can, the import is successful. 
> > 
> > > On Oct 27, 6:00 pm, David Trowbridge  wrote: 
> > 
> > > > Can you "import P4" from an interactive python shell? 
> > 
> > > > -David 
> > 
> > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, thegreendroid <
> shreyasbhar...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > > Thanks David. 
> > 
> > > > > I've enabled logging and there's nothing in the logs except 
> > 
> > > > > '08:11:43   DEBUG 
> > > > > Logging to logs\reviewboard.log with a minimum level of DEBUG 
> > > > > 08:18:28DEBUG 
> > > > > Logging to logs\reviewboard.log with a minimum level of DEBUG 
> > > > > 08:18:28DEBUG 
> > > > > Log file for Review Board v1.6.1 (PID 6392)' 
> > 
> > > > > How do I go about figuring out the problem if I don't know have 
> any 
> > > > > details about the exception? 
> > 
> > > > > Thanks for your help. 
> > 
> > > > > On Oct 26, 7:19 pm, David Trowbridge  wrote: 
> > > > >> There's a "logging" tab in the admin where you can set this up. 
> > 
> > > > >> -David 
> > 
> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:16 PM, thegreendroid 
> > 
> > > > >>  wrote: 
> > > > >> > I am using Apache v2.2.21 with mod_wsgi and p4python is 
> installed. I 
> > > > >> > am using Python 2.7 by the way. 
> > 
> > > > >> > I'll check the logs and post what I find here. Also, how do I 
> enable 
> > > > >> > Reviewboard logs? 
> > 
> > > > >> > On Oct 26, 6:56 pm, David Trowbridge  
> wrote: 
> > > > >> >> It depends on which web server you're using and what method of 
> > > > >> >> invoking review board. 
> > > > >> >> You can also check the review board logs (if enabled). 
> > 
> > > > >> >> -David 
> > 
> > > > >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:44 PM, thegreendroid 
> > 
> > > > >> >>  wrote: 
> > > > >> >> > Thanks for the quick reply David. 
> > 
> > > > >> >> > Would the exception be recorded in the web server log? I 
> checked 
> > > > >> >> > Reviewboard's logs but there was nothing there. 
> > 
> > > > >> >> > On Oct 26, 6:02 pm, David Trowbridge  
> wrote: 
> > > > >> >> >> You'll have to check your web server logs for the full 
> error, but my 
> > > > >> >> >> guess is that p4python is not correctly installed. 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> -David 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:50 PM, thegreendroid <
> shreyasbhar...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > > >> >> >> > Hi there, 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > I am trying to add a new Perforce repository in the 
> Reviewboard Admin 
> > > > >> >> >> > dashboard and I get the following error (at the top of 
> the page) - 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > "Please correct the error below. 
> > > > >> >> >> > DLL load failed: The specified module could not be 
> found." 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Can someone please point out what could be wrong? 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Thanks. 
> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > -- 
> > > > >> >> >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today 
> athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ 
> > > > >> >> >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://
> www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
> > > > >> >> >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- 
> > > > >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com  
> > > > >> >> >> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en 
> > 
> > > > >> >> > -- 
> > > > >> >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://
> www.reviewboard.org/donate/ 
> > > > >> >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
> > > > >> >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~-

Re: install RB extension

2012-09-13 Thread kvr
When can we expect a production build?

On Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:40:10 PM UTC+5:30, Steven MacLeod wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Extensions are not supported in version 1.6.1, support starts in version 
> 1.7 which is currently in beta. Note that 1.7 is still unstable and not 
> recommended for production use yet.
>
> Steve
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Presently i am using RB server 1.6.1 and I want to install reviewboard 
>> extension explicitly, is it recommended or supported for this version of RB 
>> server.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nilesh J
>>
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-09-13 Thread kvr
Thanks for your reply.

But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install 
from source.

On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-09-12 Thread kvr
Hi,
I am facing problem while installing 1.7beta1 release from source.
It's throwing "RuntimeError: Failed to build media files" error .

My easy-install.pth contains below things.

import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path)
./python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg
./recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg
./pytz-2012d-py2.7.egg
./python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.egg
./paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.7.egg
./flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.7.egg
./Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg
./django_evolution-0.6.7-py2.7.egg
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL
./mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg
./django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg
./Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg
./Jinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg
./RBTools-0.4.1-py2.7.egg
./requests-0.14.0-py2.7.egg
./Djblets-0.7.1-py2.7.egg
/root/Desktop/rb_1.7
./nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7
import sys; new=sys.path[sys.__plen:]; del sys.path[sys.__plen:]; 
p=getattr(sys,'__egginsert',0); sys.path[p:p]=new; sys.__egginsert = 
p+len(new)

Please help me.

Regards,
KVR

On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
> 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
> rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>
> Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
> use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
> definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
> release.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Upgrade Review board

2012-09-12 Thread kvr
I mean does the upgrade effect the existing review board database including 
users and review requests? 

On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:58:09 PM UTC+5:30, kvr wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> How to upgrade my review board-1.5 to 1.7 without losing the existing data?
>
> Regards,
> KVR
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Upgrade Review board

2012-09-12 Thread kvr
Hi ,

How to upgrade my review board-1.5 to 1.7 without losing the existing data?

Regards,
KVR

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board deployment in Apache

2012-09-05 Thread KVR
Thanks Christian  !

Resolved this issue by installing pycrypto2.6.

Now the site is up but not displayed properly, so checking the Apache error
log.


Thanks,
KVR

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Christian Hammond  wrote:

> There's a number of things that can go wrong, hence my advice that you
> don't install in a production environment.
>
> First thing to check is the reviewboard.log file and see if there's any
> information there that points to the problem.
>
> The Apache error log may also be useful.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Sep 5, 2012, at 0:04, kvr  wrote:
>
> Thanks Christian  !
>
> I've installed Review Board 1.7 Beta1 in production environment on Apache.
> But it is showing "Review Board is taking a nap"
> message when I access.
> Please tell what's the wrong with this setup?
> Thanks,
> KVR
>
> On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:27:45 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi KVR,
>>
>> You'll want to follow our documentation on reviewboard.org. The
>> administration guide walks you through setting up a site and deploying it.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:34 AM, kvr  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've downloaded Review Board-1.7 beta1 code , added a widget and tested
>>> in development sever now it's time to deploy it , please tell me how to
>>> deploy it in Apache .
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> KVR
>>>
>>> --
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/<http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/>
>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/<http://www.reviewboard.org/users/>
>>> -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@**
>>> googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>> group/reviewboard?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en>
>>
>>
>>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>



-- 
Regards,
ram

*
*

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board deployment in Apache

2012-09-05 Thread kvr
Thanks Christian  !

I've installed Review Board 1.7 Beta1 in production environment on Apache.
But it is showing "Review Board is taking a nap"
message when I access.
Please tell what's the wrong with this setup?
Thanks,
KVR

On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:27:45 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi KVR,
>
> You'll want to follow our documentation on reviewboard.org. The 
> administration guide walks you through setting up a site and deploying it.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:34 AM, kvr >wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've downloaded Review Board-1.7 beta1 code , added a widget and tested 
>> in development sever now it's time to deploy it , please tell me how to 
>> deploy it in Apache .
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> KVR
>>
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Review Board deployment in Apache

2012-09-04 Thread kvr
Hi,

I've downloaded Review Board-1.7 beta1 code , added a widget and tested in 
development sever now it's time to deploy it , please tell me how to deploy 
it in Apache .

Thanks in advance,
KVR

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Regarding issue summary table in Review Board 1.7 beta 1

2012-08-31 Thread kvr
Thanks for your replies  !.

I am new to review board and  planning to implement a feature in Review 
Board that lets us know how many LOC has been reviewed and before shipping 
any review request it should not be possible for a reviewer to ship it 
without entering LOC reviewed .

Please give me an idea on how to implement. 

Thanks,
ram

On Friday, August 31, 2012 1:29:43 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> That's part of review requests. Any open issues on a review request will 
> show data in that table. It's not a part of the administration UI.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com 
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, KVR >wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've downloaded and installed Review Board 1.7 beta 1 recently, but 
>> couldn't find any widget/extension for 'issue summary table' mentioned in 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
>>
>> Could you please let me know how to get this.
>>
>> We checked in widgets.py file if it is present there but couldn't find.
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks in Advance,
>> ram
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Regarding issue summary table in Review Board 1.7 beta 1

2012-08-30 Thread KVR
Hi,

I've downloaded and installed Review Board 1.7 beta 1 recently, but
couldn't find any widget/extension for 'issue summary table' mentioned in
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/

Could you please let me know how to get this.

We checked in widgets.py file if it is present there but couldn't find.

-- 
Thanks in Advance,
ram

*
*

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Got API Error 206 (HTTP code 400): The repository path specified is not in the list of known repositories

2012-08-29 Thread kvr
We too faced this issue, and after adding repository ip in .reviewboardrc 
the issue was resolved.
So I think presence of .reviewboardrc file is must in every user's home 
directory.

KVR

On Monday, August 20, 2012 4:38:36 PM UTC+5:30, cmuser wrote:
>
>
> I have reviewboard install on server named "ABC(172.16.7.100)" & my cvs is 
> installed on server "DEF"
> when i commit code from ser "ABC" it works but same command when i try on 
> ser-"DEF" it fails with below error. Can some1 help where i am going wrong?
> Not sure if .reviewboardrc file should also be there, but i have tried 
> with that also but still it failed
>
> cat .reviewboardrc
>
> REPOSITORY = ':pserver:cmsuer@def:/opt/cvsroot'
>
> REVIEWBOARD_URL = 'http://172.16.7.100:81'
>
> command on changed files-
>
> $>post-review --debug --server=http://172.16.7.100:81 --username=admin 
> --password=admin  --repository-url=':pserver:cmuser@def:/opt/cvsroot'
> >>> RBTools 0.3
> >>> svn info :pserver:kapilap@def:/opt/cvsroot
> >>> repository info: Path: svn.mmt.com:/opt/cvsroot, Base path: None, 
> Supports changesets: False
> >>> cvs diff -uN
> >>> HTTP GETting api/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://172.16.7.100:81/api/info/
> >>> Using the new web API
> >>> Attempting to create review request on def.domain.com:/opt/cvsroot for 
> None
> >>> HTTP POSTing to http://172.16.7.100:81/api/review-requests/: 
> {'repository': 'def.domain.com:/opt/cvsroot'}
> >>> Got API Error 206 (HTTP code 400): The repository path specified is 
> not in the list of known repositories
> >>> Error data: {'stat': 'fail', 'repository': 
> 'def.domain.com:/opt/cvsroot', 'err': {'msg': 'The repository path 
> specified is not in the list of known repositories', 'code': 206}}
>
> There was an error creating this review request.
>
> The repository path "def.domain.com:/opt/cvsroot" is not in the
> list of known repositories on the server.
>
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Start new app

2012-08-23 Thread kvr
I meant like Django apps, can we create and install apps for Review board 
too rather than extensions to enhance the features ?

On Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:47:47 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> What do you want to create these for? 
>
> Christian 
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 4:27, kvr > wrote: 
>
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > Can we create new apps for reviewboard using manage.py? 
> > I have tried but couldn't succeed. 
> > 
> > Please tell me how to create new apps for reviewboard. 
> > 
> > Regards, 
> > kvr 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ 
> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com  
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en 
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Start new app

2012-08-22 Thread kvr
Hi,

Can we create new apps for reviewboard using manage.py?
I have tried but couldn't succeed.

Please tell me how to create new apps for reviewboard.

Regards,
kvr

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en