Ehem..excuse meWalmart.
My friend had an Exch server like that. When I told him a few years back I
was getting into it, all he could do was complain that it crashes all the
time, the IS is constantly corrupting, etc. I have yet to ever experience
that.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crow
That's what you get for buying your hardware at KMart.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:05 P
The subnets as presented should work.
172.22.64.0/22 would permit hosts from 172.22.64.1 through 192.22.67.254.
172.22.32.0/22 would permit hosts from 172.22.32.1 through 192.22.35.254.
However, if these subnets are not consistent with the router's definitions
things won't work. I suspect a mis
Do I get the pimp fee on this one Sigi? - Andy Webb
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert
B.
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 P
Who's buyin'?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: a
Any job where one is expected to be perfect will inevitably overwhelm the
employee.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske
Sent: Thursd
Would the amount of effort required be proporational to the size of the
company? Why?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Thursday
You didn't know that helium became combustible in 1987?
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Joseph
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:35
Change the alias. Don't worry about the directory name since it is an
attribute you cannot change.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mitchell
Indeed. Mail that is worth keeping is worth keeping in the Information
Store.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursd
That wouldn't technically be Spam, which is slang for unsolicited commercial
e-mail or UCE. A virus sending itself out on your behalf would definitely
be a nuisance, but it wouldn't be Spam.
©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I®
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Or
The client configuration part is in Outlook, but the feature works in
Exchange, as it must if it is to reply to messages without the user being
logged on with an Outlook client. So, theoretically, there must be some way
to write a program to turn on Out Of Office, but as far as I am aware, the
in
"Can anyone recommend an antivirus solution for Exchange?"
":)"
";)"
":("
"Help!"
"Who fscking cares?"
"I've tried that already."
"frickin' lyris, Delete..."
"...run performance optimizer..."
"...reapply service pack..."
"...bombed with oofs..."
"FAQ"
"What's FAQ?"
"..carebears list..."
"..on it l
But I picked it up and carried it through the year. That is why I will bow.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Naw. That one was from 2000
::Taking a bow::
-Original Message-
From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
"You should get the enterprise version. It supports saucer separation!"
-Ori
Heh!! Oh yea baby cause that's what Symantec told us to do!! :)
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
"Let's run NAV for Exchange in MAPI
You are correct, they are not there. That is because by default it is
dynamic. The registry entries force it to be static.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Upgraded
Somebody is seriously full of )#($
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Upgraded from 5.5 SP3
I checked for the static RPC ports and the dword entries for tcp/ip port
ar
"Does anyone know of a nicer list than this one?"
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
"I swear I read the FAQ" (followed immediately
"I swear I read the FAQ" (followed immediately by someone posting the exact
location in the FAQ)
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases -
I think I'll add that one to the other 12 or so I have from you.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/28/01 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
For the record, I said nothing quotable this year, and I specifically
didn't
say
"How do I unsubscribe from this list?"
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlo
Naw. That one was from 2000 and it was originally posted on the Sansa-Belt
Exchange List by someone who is no longer on that said list.
-Original Message-
From: Presley, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top
Sorry to keep posting.
I just tried to logon to the machine as the local administrator, dialed
up, started the vpn, and tried to set up my profile logged on as the local
administrator. When the logon pop up came up, which I had used previously,
I entered my information. It failed, it is like it is
Also we are about to upgrade from 5.5 standard to enterprise, are there
any pitfalls that I need to know about?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesea
Upgraded from 5.5 SP3
I checked for the static RPC ports and the dword entries for tcp/ip port
are not there. This is the info I got from the knowledge base. Is this
correct?
Also I can't remember where but isn't there somewhere on the information
store besides the recipients container, that cli
"You can only get Nimda if you have a web server, We don't have a web
server!, Now Show we how to get our mail over the web again."
As said by my manager , as he was denying my purchase order for the
new Up-Grade to NAV for exchange.
Saucer Separation...Ha! That's a good one.
-Ori
"You should get the enterprise version. It supports saucer separation!"
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
W
"How do I add a disclaimer to my outgoing email"
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Thought it was "I'm running IE 2.0 and Outlook 97 on
"Let's run NAV for Exchange in MAPI only mode!"
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Thought it was "I'm running IE 2.0 and Outlook 97 on W
You too?
"Well, do you have a backup?"
"Yes, but we don't know where the tapes are."
> -Original Message-
> From: Dillon, Jeff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
>
What/how do I fix my OWA
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phras
Thought it was "I'm running IE 2.0 and Outlook 97 on Windows 3.1 and I
can't..."
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
"Do you use Outlook
Additional question:
What about moving the System Mailbox? Same procedure as moving users
mailboxes?
Thanks,
Fred
Ok,
I've got Enterprise.
I moved my mailbox, however there was a significant lag before I could
log back on, even after the 1007 event.
I found the counter, but I may not have
"BSD Skunks the Penguin" ;o)
D
"In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king." -Desiderius Erasmus
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases -
That one sounds familiar!! ;o)
D
"If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing." -Anon
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
"Fix
Where is this faq?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
For the record, I said nothing quotable this year, and I specifically didn't
say anything quotable about any "valued and respected Microsoft partners."
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrish,
"Do you use Outlook?"
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases
"Fix your Broke @ss Sh!t"
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements,
A more cogent question:
What does the archive of the outbound message show? MS-TNEF mayhaps? (IMS
Properties:Diagnostics:Message Archiving: Maximum, will be stored in
\imcdata\out\archive)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Where's MEC next year?
Why U no answer me?
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts,
#12 - you have to 'make' the time. * manager's voice *
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
#11 -- plan ahead
-Original Message-
#11 -- plan ahead
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Y
Ok,
I've got Enterprise.
I moved my mailbox, however there was a significant lag before I could
log back on, even after the 1007 event.
I found the counter, but I may not have enough traffic to notice the
difference. I've only got 8 users on this box at present and most of
those are on vacatio
Before taking any potentially long and laborious steps (like installing a
new server and moving users over), see if running NTBackup against the
Exchange server produces the same errors. In the past, I have seen
BackupExec (not NetBackup - haven't used that product) produce this error
erroneously
Who me?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Logging on to domain.
Are you suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder or are you responding
to your own questions?
> ---
1) Check your application event logs - there will be either a 1216
event (Standard) or 1217 (Enterprise) on startup.
2) There's a counter for the Single Instance Storage Ration in
Performance Monitor under the IS performance object counters.
3) Users can be moved while logged into the server
Are you suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder or are you responding
to your own questions?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Problems Logging on to domai
Dear DL Members,
What were the top ten posts, statements, or phrases of Year 2001?
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_
Fred, if you're new to Exchange and are unsure about what will happen or
exactly what you should do. Call PSS.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: ESE98 ?
>
Ahhh.. Well "I" assumed he upgraded from 5.5 Sp3 to 5.5 SP4. ;o)
D
"The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we
behave when we don't know what to do." -John Holt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 2
I assumed. I could be wrong but from the information given and the problem
he was experiencing I assumed this was the case. He stated:
> Sorry for not being clear,
> upgraded to 5.5 sp4
> patched IIS
> updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches
I assumed "upgraded to 5.5 sp4" meant he was upg
This is why I ask
Routers do not forward Netbios so if you depending on this for connectivity
this is a problem. You stated that TCP/IP is working but not Netbios. How
did you determine this?
If you modify the lmhosts file on the local machine with the domain
information does that make a d
Where did you see that he upgraded from 5.0 to 5.5 SP4?I don't recall
that. Of course, his lack of detail is making this so much harder to
troubleshoot... ;o)
D
"Delusions: There is no joy greater than soaring high on the wings of your
dreams, except maybe the joy of watching a dreamer
By the wayWhat are you using to connect these two networks together?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Logging on to domain.
This is an improper subnet for only
Maybe so.. But what if you upgrade from 5.0 to 5.5 SP4? Which...by the way,
is what "seems" to be the case here but that part was left out.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Acc
That's what I originally thought. That's something hard coded into the
registry and I don't know of too many apps that overwrite manual changes to
the registry...
D
"Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can
survive the odds beating you." - - http://www.despair.com
>>> anytime you upgrade IE on a server be
prepared for something to happen you did not plan on.
I personally do not upgrade IE on a production server unless necessary, but
I have never had a problem whenever I have had to do it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
This is an improper subnet for only 2 networks. Your using a class B
network and 6 bits from the third octet (252). This would yield 62 subnets
with 1022 hosts per subnet and a range of 4. (Check my math everyone).
Why not just close off all the bits for each subnet. Example:
172.22.64.0
255.
SP Upgrades or Exchange upgrades. I believe he stated that he upgraded to
Exch 5.5 then SP4. The Exchange upgrade would have reset the RPC
ports"I think". Not to mention, anytime you upgrade IE on a server be
prepared for something to happen you did not plan on.
-Original Message-
Sounds good. But I have some questions:
1) How can I verify that I'm running the Enterprise version?
2) How can I check the SIS ratio?
3) Can I do this while users are using the system, or does everyone
need to be off?
4) How do I verify that I've completed the move?
If you can't tell, I
This is an improper subnet for only 2 networks. Your using a class B
network and 6 bits from the third octet (252). This would yield 62 subnets
with 1022 hosts per subnet and a range of 4. (Check my math everyone).
Why not just close off all the bits for each subnet. Example:
172.22.64.0
255.
See what happens if you reapply the latest SP to the Admin program.
Missy Koslosky
Tech Consultant
Compaq Federal, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:22 PM
Posted To: Internet Messaging Interest List at swynk
I've done plenty of SP upgrades on Exchange and can unequivicably state that
it does NOT remove the static port mappings.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -O
I wouldn't run eseutil unless it was my only choice.
IIf you're running the Enterprise version of Exchange, it's simplest to
create a new private store and move the mailboxes to the new store; the
database will then hold "fresh" copies of all of the data. If you're
running the Standard version o
Did you rerun the performance optimizer on the Exchange server following all
patches?
What order did you patch the server in?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -
I'm having some serious problems with my NT domain, have exhausted all my
resources, and don't know where else to look... any help would be
appreciated.
Symptoms:
My windows 98 clients on a different subnet are unable to log on to the
domain. (they are on the 172.22.64.0/255.255.252.0 subnet)
By then it could be too late :(
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Client Connectivity
Thanks for your help! I apologize again for the multiples. I'm going to
leave it as it is and h
I'm not familiar with the application, but it looks like it uses these
constants to build an LDAP path to the Exchange server.
=
Kyle M. Burns, MCSD, MCT
ECommerce Technology Manager
Centra Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
www.faqs.org | RFCs | 2821
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Bollhofer, Mary I. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IMS -
When View, Hidden Recipients is chosen in the Recipients container, the
admin app stops responding. I suspect this is related to an Internet
custom recipient I created, and hid yesterday. I forwarded an exchange
mailbox's messages to the Internet custom recipient.
Can you tell me how to recover t
I have an e-mail message sitting in my Exchange 5.5 IMS Outbound Queue that
states [421 Resource Unavailable]. Where can I go to find out what
this 421 message means exactly?
___
This e-mail, including any attachments, may co
Thanks for your help! I apologize again for the multiples. I'm going to
leave it as it is and hopefully on monday my boss will agree not to expose
the server so much.
Thanks again
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resour
When View, Hidden Recipients is chosen in the exchange administrator
application the application stops responding. I believe this is related to
a Internet custom recipient I created yesterday. It was designated as the
alternate recipient for regular exchange mailbox. It does not appear as
the alte
Hi All,
Whilst troubleshooting my NetBackup for Exchange, I revealed database
issues on my server. Any suggestions as to how to deal with this w/o
the backup it suggests?
Currently I only have 8 users on this box and all use it daily with
success. The Veritas tech suggested that I run the eseu
I understand that it is best to use this app with OWA but what are these
entries in the Global.inc for?
' Const APP_ENTERPRISE = "YourExchangeOrganization"
' Const APP_SITE = "YourExchangeSite"
' Const APP_SERVER = "YourExchangeServer
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
No, I haven't done that/
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CRC errors
are you also taking CRC errors on the serial int of your router out to the
ISP?
-Original Message-
I am using ScanMail for Exchange and when I setup the attachment filtering
option I noticed only inbound messages from an outside source are affected.
I read up and found that is correct, only messages queued thought the SMTP
connector are affected. So here is my question, what protocol does E2K u
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CRC errors
Did you set to 100MB for speed and Full for duplex setting on both your
server and switch?
Brian
-Original Message-
From:
We have a set of 18 production servers that are specifically designed to
crash utterly and completely every 3-4 months. These are multi-purpose
servers so I get to DR Exchange on the average 3-5 times every time a total
crash occurs because some bozo touches the server after I do. Therefore I
r
Did you set to 100MB for speed and Full for duplex setting on both your
server and switch?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CRC errors
I have
October 25th would be a bad day for me as well. That's my Birthday, not to
mention, it's a Friday. ;o)
D
"Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you." - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 2
Me either.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
I suppose. If you accessing OWA from the Exchange Server I guess this would
be relevant.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Well, for OWA to work with the current patch
What's Disaster Recovery planning?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on h
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having
to do more next year and the years to come. :o)
D
"A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer."
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, Dec
Oh, there you go. SP4 would have changed things back the "WAY" they
"SHOULD" be.
D
"Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk?" -Anon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subjec
Oulook 2000 SP2
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL P
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment
There's you answer. I "think" the upgrade to 5.5 SP4 would have "reset" the
static RPC ports defined previously. You can set this back...but, I would
not recommend doing so.
Your best bet is to implement a VPN solution if users wish to access the
Exchange Server via the Internet using a "Mapi
Well, for OWA to work with the current patches, ya gotta have IE 5.5 sp2, eh?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Do not be too moral. You may cheat yourself out of much life. So aim above
morality. Be not simply good; be good for somethi
Don't access the internet from it, I have no good explanation for why I
upgraded the browser.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
What are you using in your attempt to connect to the Exchange server over
the Internet?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded to 5.5
Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded to 5.5 sp4
patched IIS
updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches
This is kind of a weird situation, security was not a concern of this
company until around the last six months. I do want to close the machine
off from the internet as much as possible, but I wa
Hello,
Scenario: we are planning to upgrade our existing NT domain w/ Exch 5.5 to
a Win2000 domain. We have no plans to upgrade to Exch2000 at this time.
The plan is to upgrade the NT domain to 2000, then to use the ADC to connect
the 5.5 directory w/ Active Directory.
The MS white paper about
How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment this year?
[1] Frightfully few I'm afraid. For those who know they didn't test as much
as they should, perhaps a new year resolution (and plan to achieve same) is
in order.
Join me now in scheduling your disaster recovery testing fo
Either way... Double check the Registry settings for the RPC ports and let
us know. Upgrading Internet Explorer is always an interesting experience.
By the way...Why did you upgrade the browser on the Exchange Server. Are
you accessing the internet from the Exchange Server for some reason. You
I'm getting more and more confused with every post... ;o)
D
"To measure the man, measure his heart." -Malcolm Stevenson Forbes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Ac
I guess I'm confused. After re-reading the original post I'm not sure what
was actually upgraded. I see Exch 5.5 then IE 4.01. Did you upgrade
Internet Explorer Browser?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Exchange
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
