On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:43:51 -0800, Carl Johnson wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>
>> So it's my stupid mistake. I could have sworn it was ext2, but it was
>> ext4. Sorry for all the noise! However, I'm glad you have helped, and
>> that I have learned a little bit about Linux partitions as FreeeBS
Walter Hurry writes:
> So it's my stupid mistake. I could have sworn it was ext2, but it was
> ext4. Sorry for all the noise! However, I'm glad you have helped, and
> that I have learned a little bit about Linux partitions as FreeeBSD
> slices.
>
> It was empty, so I just reformatted it as ext
62529280 Mode: r0w0e0
>>rawtype: 131 length: 4194304 offset: 46143188992 type:
>>linux-data index: 1430498 end: 172043415 start: 90121368
>>
>> So I put into my /etc/fstab:
>>
>> /dev/ada0s8 /u01ext2fs ro,noauto 0 0
>>
>>
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:24:06 +0100, Carl Johnson wrote:
/dev/ada0s8 /u01ext2fs ro,noauto 00
I've got 2 ext3 "partitions" mounted.
/dev/ada0s8 /mnt/dump ext2fs rw 0 0
/dev/ada0s9 /mnt/archli
put from
> 'gpart list ada0s4':
>
> 4. Name: ada0s8
>Mediasize: 4194304 (39G)
>Sectorsize: 512
>Stripesize: 0
>Stripeoffset: 162529280
>Mode: r0w0e0
>rawtype: 131
>length: 4194304
>offset: 46143188992
>type: linux-data
>
G)
Sectorsize: 512
Stripesize: 0
Stripeoffset: 162529280
Mode: r0w0e0
rawtype: 131
length: 4194304
offset: 46143188992
type: linux-data
index: 1430498
end: 172043415
start: 90121368
So I put into my /etc/fstab:
/dev/ada0s8 /u01ext2fs
rst disk is a physical one, and will mount
> happily under FreeBSD.
>
>>From /etc/fstab:
>
> /dev/ada0s3 /Mail ext2fs rw00
>
> But I have a couple of logical partitions (also ext2fs) in the fourth
> slice, which I have been trying
sical one, and will mount
happily under FreeBSD.
From /etc/fstab:
/dev/ada0s3 /Mail ext2fs rw00
But I have a couple of logical partitions (also ext2fs) in the fourth
slice, which I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to mount.
For information, here is th
under FreeBSD.
>From /etc/fstab:
/dev/ada0s3 /Mail ext2fs rw00
But I have a couple of logical partitions (also ext2fs) in the fourth
slice, which I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to mount.
For information, here is the BSD view of the disk:
$ su
Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > the problem with (this) cardreader seems to be that the card must
> > already inserted at boot time; a later switch to another card, for
> > example from a card with 'msdosfs' to a card with '
card, for
example from a card with 'msdosfs' to a card with 'ext2fs', gives the
problem in my first mail; don't know if this is a bug or feature :-)
Try forced retasting after loading a card.
true > /dev/da0
What do you expect exactly from this command? The actual
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> What do you expect exactly from this command? The actual shell will open
> /dev/da0 for writing + truncating and will connect (dup) its fd 1 to it;
> then it will execute 'true', perhaps as buit-in; so what?
>
As he stated, it forces a GEO
example from a card with 'msdosfs' to a card with 'ext2fs', gives the
> > problem in my first mail; don't know if this is a bug or feature :-)
>
> Try forced retasting after loading a card.
>
>true > /dev/da0
What do you expect exactly from this
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
the problem with (this) cardreader seems to be that the card must
already inserted at boot time; a later switch to another card, for
example from a card with 'msdosfs' to a card with 'ext2fs', gives the
problem in my first mail; don
y /xp anyway ).
>
> Easier: file -s /dev/da0s1
gives now:
# file -s /dev/da0s1
/dev/da0s1: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data (mounted or unclean)
and /dev/da0s1 is mounted:
# mount | fgrep /dev/da0s1
/dev/da0s1 on /mnt (ext2fs, local)
the problem with (this) cardreader seems to be th
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> > what does lsvfs show ?
>
> Maybe try: dd if=/dev/da0s1 count=20 of=/tmp/t ; file /tmp/t
> (it show interesting stuff on my /xp anyway ).
Easier: file -s /dev/da0s1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
> > what does lsvfs show ?
>
> Maybe try: dd if=/dev/da0s1 count=20 of=/tmp/t ; file /tmp/t
> (it show interesting stuff on my /xp anyway ).
kldstat # I guess that shows you have the module linked in too ?
or else already compiled in
config -x /boot/kernel/kernel | grep ext
so a puzzle if all t
> what does lsvfs show ?
Maybe try: dd if=/dev/da0s1 count=20 of=/tmp/t ; file /tmp/t
(it show interesting stuff on my /xp anyway ).
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent wi
> # kldload ext2fs
> kldload: can't load ext2fs: File exists
what does lsvfs show ?
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ".
Format: Pla
Hello,
I'm trying to mount an ext2fs in 10-CURRENT with:
# fdisk /dev/da0
*** Working on device /dev/da0 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=486 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl)
parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
cylinders=486 hea
t to move /var
>> and /usr to it. Do i need to format /dev/ad4s8 to UFS ?
>
> I would, there are FreeBSD specific file flags, that I don't think are
> supported by ext2fs. UFS with soft-updates is going to be faster than
> synchron
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
zaxis wrote:
> The /dev/ad4s8 is an empty partition. Now i want to move /var
> and /usr to it. Do i need to format /dev/ad4s8 to UFS ?
I would, there are FreeBSD specific file flags, that I don't think are
supported by ext2fs. UFS with soft
On Thu 2010-06-24 18:36:13 UTC-0700, zaxis (z_a...@163.com) wrote:
> /dev/ad4s8 on /media/G (ext2fs, local)
>
> The /dev/ad4s8 is an empty partition. Now i want to move /var and /usr to
> it. Do i need to format /dev/ad4s8 to UFS ?
I would reformat it as UFS unless you plan on
pdates)
/dev/ad4s3d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ad4s7 on /media/F (msdosfs, local)
/dev/ad4s8 on /media/G (ext2fs, local)
The /dev/ad4s8 is an empty partition. Now i want to move /var and /usr to
it. Do i need to format /dev/ad4s8 to UFS ?
Sincerely!
-
e^(π⋅i) + 1 = 0
--
Vie
n /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
>> > /dev/ad8s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
>> > /dev/ntfs/DATOSWIN on /media/DATOSWIN (ntfs, local, nosuid)
>> > [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# *mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad6s1 /ext2*
>> > [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# cd /ext2
>> >
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:33:59 +0200, Mark Stapper wrote:
> Don't forget to reapply the ext2 patch... ;-)
And of course keep in mind that kernel and world (userland) have
to be of the same version, e. g. if you upgrade your sources to
7-STABLE, recompile kernel and world and install them. You'll
fi
h installed, just compiled the KERNEL to add ext2fs
> > support and installed the patch for the 256-inode... nothing else...
> > But I will take your advise and upgrade my kernel to STABLE (as I
> > think it will be funny as well, ur not the one "geek" here
Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
> hi Mark!
>
> Im using FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE... but im not sure about the "userland",
> is currently fresh installed, just compiled the KERNEL to add ext2fs
> support and installed the patch for the 256-inode... nothing else...
> But I will tak
hi Mark!
Im using FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE... but im not sure about the "userland", is
currently fresh installed, just compiled the KERNEL to add ext2fs support
and installed the patch for the 256-inode... nothing else... But I will take
your advise and upgrade my kernel to STABLE (as I thi
all, i did save my /home from my old Linux distribution on
> another
> > HD, ext2fs partition /dev/ad6s1... I can correctly see the drive from
> > sysinstall.
> >
> > I read about compiling the KERNEL in order to add Ext2fs support under
> > Freebsd, wich I did..
Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
> Hi folks, im migrating from Linux to BSD, and i found my first problem...
> First of all, i did save my /home from my old Linux distribution on another
> HD, ext2fs partition /dev/ad6s1... I can correctly see the drive from
> sysinstall.
>
> I read a
suid)
> [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# *mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad6s1 /ext2*
> [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# cd /ext2
> *bash: cd: /ext2: Not a directory*
> [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# ls -la /ext2
> *ls: /ext2: Bad file descriptor*
> [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]#
>
Here's the problem:
http://www
f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > /dev/ad8s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > /dev/ntfs/DATOSWIN on /media/DATOSWIN (ntfs, local, nosuid)
> > [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# *mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad6s1 /ext2*
> > [root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# cd /ext2
> > *bas
(ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ad8s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ad8s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ntfs/DATOSWIN on /media/DATOSWIN (ntfs, local, nosuid)
[root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# *mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad6s1 /ext2*
[root@ /media/DATOSWIN]# cd /ext2
*bash: cd: /ext2: Not a
Maybe just malquoted, but...
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:20:29 +, Jeronimo Calvo
wrote:
> # mount -t extfs2 /dev/ad6s1 /ext2
> mount: /dev/ad6s1 : Operation not supported by device
The command should include -t ext2fs, not extfs2, as far as I
remember. I haven't run Linux for almo
cott
On Aug 24, 2009, at 13:20:29, Jeronimo Calvo wrote:
Hi folks, im migrating from Linux to BSD, and i found my first
problem...
First of all, i did save my /home from my old Linux distribution on
another
HD, ext2fs partition /dev/ad6s1... I can correctly see the drive from
sysinstall.
I r
Hi folks, im migrating from Linux to BSD, and i found my first problem...
First of all, i did save my /home from my old Linux distribution on another
HD, ext2fs partition /dev/ad6s1... I can correctly see the drive from
sysinstall.
I read about compiling the KERNEL in order to add Ext2fs support
> # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8 /mnt/
> # ls /mnt
> ls: /mnt: Bad file descriptor
Weird.
I can mount ext2fs on 7.0 (and previously on 6.0 and 6.2) and
things mostly work. In the past I had ext2fs on both primary
and extended slices (or whatever the preferred terminology is).
This is
tput:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mkdir /mnttest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls -la / | grep mnttest
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 5 17:16 mnttest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8 /mnttest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls /mnttest
ls: /mnttest: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # file
On Saturday 05 July 2008 05:59:42 Roland Smith wrote:
> mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls /mnt
ls: /mnt: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls -la / | grep /mnt
ls: mnt: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL PROTEC
/dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 89 Jul 3 20:27 /dev/ad0s8
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mkdir /mnttest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8 /mnttest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls /mnttest
ls: /mnttest: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # file /mnttest
/mnttest: cannot open `/mnttest
Hey,
ls -la / | grep mnttest
Can you paste output of this command?
sysid 5 (0x05),(Extended DOS)
start 102398310, size 106446690 (51975 Meg), flag 0
beg: cyl 1023/ head 0/ sector 1;
end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63
So the partition you're trying to mount is under an e
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:46:09AM -0300, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
> On Saturday 05 July 2008 03:24:53 Nejc Škoberne wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > > Have you, by any chance, tried and suceded at mounting ext2fs on FBSD7?
> > > If you did, at least I'd know that it _
On Saturday 05 July 2008 03:24:53 Nejc Škoberne wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Have you, by any chance, tried and suceded at mounting ext2fs on FBSD7?
> > If you did, at least I'd know that it _is_ possible :s
>
> It is possible, although I haven't used this on FreeBSD 7.0 y
ze Name
> >>> 1 10 0xc040 4dd878 kernel
> >>> 21 0xc08de000 7559b0 nvidia.ko
> >>> 31 0xc1034000 6721cacpi.ko
> >>> 41 0xc4a2e000 4000 logo_saver.ko
> >>> 51 0xc5884000 1ext2fs.ko
> >>
Hey,
Have you, by any chance, tried and suceded at mounting ext2fs on FBSD7?
If you did, at least I'd know that it _is_ possible :s
It is possible, although I haven't used this on FreeBSD 7.0 yet (only on 5.x
and 6.x releases).
I'd also try this:
mkdir /mnttest
mount -t ex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 10 0xc040 4dd878 kernel
21 0xc08de000 7559b0 nvidia.ko
31 0xc1034000 6721cacpi.ko
41 0xc4a2e000 4000 logo_saver.ko
51 0xc5884000 1ext2fs.ko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8
logo_saver.ko
> > 51 0xc5884000 1ext2fs.ko
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8 /mnt/
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls /mnt
> > ls: /mnt: Bad file descriptor
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cd /mnt
> > /mnt: Not a directory.
> > [EMAIL PROTEC
0xc040 4dd878 kernel
21 0xc08de000 7559b0 nvidia.ko
31 0xc1034000 6721cacpi.ko
41 0xc4a2e000 4000 logo_saver.ko
51 0xc5884000 1ext2fs.ko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8 /mnt/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls /mnt
ls: /mnt: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL
1 0xc08de000 7559b0 nvidia.ko
31 0xc1034000 6721cacpi.ko
41 0xc4a2e000 4000 logo_saver.ko
51 0xc5884000 1ext2fs.ko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s8 /mnt/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ls /mnt
ls: /mnt: Bad file descriptor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cd /mnt
/mnt
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 07:37:56 anhnmncb wrote:
> Hi, list,
> Recently, I encounter a very annoying issue, when I try to
> mount an ext2fs filesystem in laptop disk, after mounted it without
> any errors, I can't access it, ls /mnt/da0s3 says "bad file
>
Hi, list,
Recently, I encounter a very annoying issue, when I try to
mount an ext2fs filesystem in laptop disk, after mounted it without any
errors, I can't access it, ls /mnt/da0s3 says "bad file
descriptor". In that disk, also has msdos and u
there I access via IFS the
ext2fs [URL="http://www.fs-driver.org/"]http://www.fs-driver.org/[/URL] ) or
with Linux and access these partitions,
- then after following boot into FreeBSD these partitions don't get mounted,
but I have to fix them with fsck first and then can mount them
(from there I access via IFS the
ext2fs [URL="http://www.fs-driver.org/"]http://www.fs-driver.org/[/URL]
) or with Linux and access these partitions,
- then after following boot into FreeBSD these partitions don't get
mounted, but I have to fix them with fsck first and then can mount
le-.file" ... "file-0999.file" in a
>>> directory. I could see the first 130 files of them.
>> Are you sure this is only happening with ext2fs? You might be running
>> into a filename mangling limitation in Samba.
[...]
> However, everything works well when
le" in a
>> directory. I could see the first 130 files of them.
>
> Are you sure this is only happening with ext2fs? You might be running
> into a filename mangling limitation in Samba.
That was my first interpretation after the test case with the filenames.
However, everything works w
130 files of them.
Are you sure this is only happening with ext2fs? You might be running
into a filename mangling limitation in Samba.
--
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Furry Peace! - http://.fur.com/p
Hi,
I've set up a FreeBSD6.2 machine and moved my "file server disk" from a
Linux system where it was used before. The disk uses ext2fs. In FreeBSD
I can see all files, when looking at the samba shares from a Windows
2000 system, I do not see all files. I also do not see all f
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +, Bob Hepple wrote:
> I need to export an ext2fs file system mounted@/mnt/guest - it's a
> removable IDE disc that I carry to & from my linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "mount" shows:
>
> /dev/ad2s1 on /mnt/guest (ext2fs
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:03:35 +1030
Malcolm Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:23 am, Bob Hepple wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:39:03 +1000
> >
> > Bob Hepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I need to export an ext2fs file s
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:23 am, Bob Hepple wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:39:03 +1000
>
> Bob Hepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need to export an ext2fs file system mounted at /mnt/guest
> > - it's a removable IDE disc that I carry to & from my linux
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:39:03 +1000
Bob Hepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to export an ext2fs file system mounted at /mnt/guest - it's a
> removable IDE disc that I carry to & from my linux system at work...
>
> "mount" shows:
>
> /dev/ad2s1 o
Hello,
Google and the search screen at www.FreeBSD.org tell me that this
question has been asked before but I can't find an answer ...
I need to export an ext2fs file system mounted at /mnt/guest - it's a
removable IDE disc that I carry to & from my linux system at work...
"
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Radek Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:17:41AM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and have compiled my kernel with optinion:
> > options EXT2FS
> >
> > In my /etc/fstab I have ad
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:17:41AM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and have compiled my kernel with optinion:
> options EXT2FS
>
> In my /etc/fstab I have added:
> /dev/ad0s6 /mnt/debian ext2fs rw 0
Hi,
I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and have compiled my kernel with optinion:
options EXT2FS
In my /etc/fstab I have added:
/dev/ad0s6 /mnt/debian ext2fs rw 0 0
to mount my debian box.
everything works fine except one thing:
Shutting down via shutdown -p
Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has passed and the machine has been
shut down and rebooted a few times. After that initial success, I have
never been able to mount that [EMAIL PROTECTED] drive again. I invariably get a
Operation not permitted
error. What gives? How can I retrieve my form
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:39:16AM -0500, Damon Butler wrote:
> I recompiled my kernel, including the "options EXT2FS" option line. No
> problem. After rebooting, I was able to successfully mount my linux
> drive thusly:
>
> mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /linux
>
itting in front of the machine, so I can't tell you. If you
> still think it's relevant, I'll fetch a copy of it as soon as I can.
>
> > What kind of error?
>
> I wish I knew. The error message is no more explicit than "Operation not
> permitted." Serio
s no more explicit than "Operation not
permitted." Seriously. Here's the error in full:
ext2fs: /dev/ad0s1: Operation not permitted
My attempts at Googling some help have so far proven useless. Bother.
--Damon
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] maili
I recompiled my kernel, including the "options EXT2FS" option line. No
problem. After rebooting, I was able to successfully mount my linux
drive thusly:
mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /linux
I transferred some files and was very happy.
Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has
Hi Warren,
Maybe. ext2fs is supposed to be ext3fs with journalling, and ext2fs can
be mounted with mount_ext2fs. I could swear I've done this with ext3fs
partitions, but can't recall when or where.
IIRC, ext3 can only be mounted as ext2 as long as the partition is
marked clean.
H
Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Phil Schulz wrote:
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
5. Does any version of freebsd supports mounting,
reading, and writing of ext3fs partitions of linux?
No.
Maybe. ext2fs is supposed to be ext3fs with journalling, and ext2fs can
be mounted with mount_ext2fs
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Phil Schulz wrote:
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
5. Does any version of freebsd supports mounting,
reading, and writing of ext3fs partitions of linux?
No.
Maybe. ext2fs is supposed to be ext3fs with journalling, and ext2fs can
be mounted with mount_ext2fs. I could swear I&#x
be:
mount_ext2fs /dev/as2s2 /data2
Assuming of course that /dev/ad2s2 is the correct partition, and that /data2
actually exists. Using "mount -t ext2fs" has never worked for me under FreeBSD,
though it is the correct syntax under Linux.
regards,
Robert
> other deep routed issue
uidzero wrote,
> Johhny,
>
> Try "mount_ext2fs /dev/as2s2 /data2" Just be sure to umount the
>partition before you reboot or anything because it "could" mess up your
>file system. Read the comment above the ext2fs module in thwe LINT kernel.
>
>Michae
Johnny wrote:
i'm trying to mount ext2 partitions from an install of rh8 on my freebsd box. simple process i'd think, but apparently not with the current setup. the bsd box is 4.8-stable with a custom kernel including the ext2fs module, so i'd like to think that isn't the s
i'm trying to mount ext2 partitions from an install of rh8 on my freebsd box. simple
process i'd think, but apparently not with the current setup. the bsd box is
4.8-stable with a custom kernel including the ext2fs module, so i'd like to think that
isn't the source of the p
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:04:06PM +0100, Stefan Krantz wrote:
>
> > > > > > I would like to extract a large (11GB) tar file on an ext3 filesystem. But
> > > > > > it shows only to be about 3gb large:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yabba# ls -la pictures.tar
> > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 331705
ck updating etc.
The ext2 code seems to do a little more than necessary. Anyway, we
shouldn't copy it, to keep the the superblock update parts of FreeBSD's
ext2fs free of the copyleft :-).
Bruce
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists
t; > Is there any possible way to extract the file?
>
> > Try this patch and let me know how it goes. You'll have to specify
> > the file name of /sys/gnu/ext2fs/ext2_inode_cnv.c to patch(1) manually,
> > then either buildkernel or rebuild only ext2fs.ko. If the fi
> > >
> > > > > yabba# ls -la pictures.tar
> > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3317055488 Feb 15 19:03 pictures.tar
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there any possible way to extract the file?
> Try this patch and let me know how it go
t linux and split the file. But I can nolonger
> > > boot linux =/ (migrated to fbsd 5.2 ;).
> >
> > I'm CC'ing tjr and bde, who might have some idea about the problem.
>
> Try this patch and let me know how it goes. You'll have to specify
> the file name
d from
> > > another OS?
> >
> > Yes. Yesterday I tested the archive with "tar tvf" (11gb) in
> > Linux and it tested OK. In FBSD it says "unexpected EOF".
> >
> > If I could i would just boot linux and split the file. But I can nolonger
&g
a different size when viewed from
> > > another OS?
> >
> > Yes. Yesterday I tested the archive with "tar tvf" (11gb) in
> > Linux and it tested OK. In FBSD it says "unexpected EOF".
> >
> > If I could i would just boot linux and split the f
5BOn Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:16:50AM +0100, Stefan Krantz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Stefan Krantz wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I would like to extract a large (11GB) tar file on an ext3 filesystem. But
> > > it shows
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Stefan Krantz wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I would like to extract a large (11GB) tar file on an ext3 filesystem. But
> > it shows only to be about 3gb large:
> >
> > yabba# ls -la pictures.tar
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 r
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Stefan Krantz wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I would like to extract a large (11GB) tar file on an ext3 filesystem. But
> it shows only to be about 3gb large:
>
> yabba# ls -la pictures.tar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3317055488 Feb 15 19:03 pictures.tar
>
> Is th
Hi!
I would like to extract a large (11GB) tar file on an ext3 filesystem. But
it shows only to be about 3gb large:
yabba# ls -la pictures.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3317055488 Feb 15 19:03 pictures.tar
Is there any possible way to extract the file?
I'm running 5.2-RELEASE on i386.
bash-2
"DG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My first question is: what documentation is there on the available kernel
> options?
[I don't run 5.x, but...]
I thought that was supposed to be a NOTES file in the conf directory.
Looks like it doesn't include EXT2FS; that mi
Greetings,
I compiled a kernel from a standard 5.1-RELEASE installation yestreen to
include support for ext2fs, but couldn't find any documentation about what
option to set to include support for ext2fs. Grepping the handbook and all
files in the .../i386/conf directory did not revea
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:03:17 +0100
Miguel Gonçalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear BSDers,
>
> I am about to move a workgroup server from Linux to FreeBSD.
>
> How stable is the FreeBSD support for ext2fs?
It should be able to read it with out probs. Not sure about
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 07:03, Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
> How stable is the FreeBSD support for ext2fs?
First, if you're planning to migrate your server permanently, you're
probably better off reformatting in UFS: it's faster, and better for
error recovery. And computers th
Hi Miguel!
Miguel_Gonçalves écrit:
> Dear BSDers,
>
> I am about to move a workgroup server from Linux to FreeBSD.
>
> How stable is the FreeBSD support for ext2fs?
I am currently using it happily (for the same purpose as yours).
Beware that the fsck_ext2fs needs to be re-lin
Dear BSDers,
I am about to move a workgroup server from Linux to FreeBSD.
How stable is the FreeBSD support for ext2fs?
Best regards,
Miguel Gonçalves
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://www.fe.up.pt/~miguelg/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
After reading more man pages and the chapter "Adding a Disk" from UNIX System
Administration Handbook, 3rd ed. by Nemieth, Snyder, Seebass and Hein, I
realize that this ext2fs harddrive will best be fixed by putting back into a
linux environment and proceeding with fdisk + fsck et
I'm trying to decipher the error message:
ext2fs: #ad/0x000a: wrong magic number 0x8b6 (expected 0xef53)
I've been reading
man magic
man file
but I have limited C experience. I see the references to ext2 in
/usr/share/misc/magic, particularly:
>>0x43a leshort ^0x001 (mo
After rebooting, tried again:
huey# mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad1s1 /aduni
ext2fs: #ad/0x2000a: wrong magic number 0x8b6 (expected 0xef53)
ext2fs: /dev/ad1s1: Invalid argument
I'm trying to mount an ext2fs formatted harddisk on freebsd 4-8 stable,
but am getting an error.
huey# mkdir /aduni
Hi,
I'm trying to mount an ext2fs formatted harddisk on freebsd 4-8 stable, but am getting an error.
huey# mkdir /aduni
huey# mount_ext2fs -o rdonly /dev/ad1s1 /aduni
mount_ext2fs: /dev/ad1s1: Invalid argument
Same error when trying: mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad1s1 /aduni
The kernel DUEY ha
> Have you tried:
>
> # mount_cd9660 /dev/acd1c /mnt/cdrom
>
> or
>
> # mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1c /mnt/cdrom
Yes, I have. I get an "incorrect superblock" error,
which is expected, because the filesystem on the CD
is ext2.
> Joshua
Thanks,
Satish Vanimisetti
__
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
