Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Diego, Friday, December 17, 2004, 7:54:10 AM, you wrote: > Looking at the points above, where does PINE falls? If you cut them, they usually fall to the ground. :-) SCNR!! -- Best regards, Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Maxim, A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 15:47:31 GMT +0100 MM> It will be 3.xx I noticed that your ignoring me :) -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 15

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Maxim, A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 14:01:16 GMT +0100 MM> We've decided to release a stable version with new major additions at a MM> cost of the nice release date, thus we will most likely to release the new MM> version in 2005. At the ri

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MM> We've decided to release a stable version with new major MM> additions at a cost of the nice release date, thus we will most MM> likely to release the new version in 2005. I had to read that twice; the first time I read it as "We've decided to rele

Re[2]: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Dierk, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 5:21:32 PM, you wrote: DH> How d'you know? It could well be that one or two of my messages to you DH> don't pose a problem today but how about tomorrow? My usual example DH> starts on January 29th 1933: That day Jewish was just another DH> religious affil

Re[2]: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Peter, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 4:07:46 PM, you wrote: PM> I haven't had such messages yet, so this doesn't pose a problem here. PM> I'd move such messages to an encrypted container anyway if there were PM> such... ;-) But it wouldn´t be too much to save an pgp encrypted message to an

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Tony, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 7:20:09 PM, you wrote: AL>> Mozilla TB> Tried it... 1/10 AL>> Thunderbird TB> Tried it... 0/10 Looking at the points above, where does PINE falls? -- Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Diego +--

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hi Tony Boom, On 15/12/2004 3:16 PM, you wrote: I didn't actually say "The Bat!" What I said was "A decent email client". Well, of those Linux users you showed us the chart, there is a percentage who wish for a decent e-mail client. I'm sure there are many who are happy with what exists and ano

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Martin, A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 16:08:48 GMT +0100 MS> You can add me to this list, please. Add yourself to the wish list, it's getting quite long now. -- Best regards,Tony. __

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

Hello Greg, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:19:39 -0600GMT (17-12-2004, 5:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ... > Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I > think they were up to release candidate for 1.4.0. I haven't seen any > notice on the release of GnuPG 1.4.0 from

Possible problem in the internal interpretation of the Date header field

Below are the headers from one of some "problematic" messages. As you can see in the attached image, the creation time seems to be on year 2000. But as you can see in the headers the dates are all on 2004. On the other hand the format of the date on "Date:" field is "Date: Tue Nov 30 01:44:00 CS

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:35:40 +0100GMT (17-12-2004, 5:35 +0100, where I live), I wrote: HdB> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- HdB> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 HdB> -END PGP MESSAGE- Sorry, I tried to sign a message with GPGshell but it did not sign but encrypted the messag

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Michael, A reminder of what Michael Schneider on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 15:55:36 GMT +0100 MS> On the other hand, kmail works pretty well and tb! for linux would have a bad MS> start because linux-users only like *working* software and hate being MS> charged for buxfixing

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello AC, A reminder of what AC Martin on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 18:30:17 GMT +0100 AM> ... and how does that chart help with knowing how many Linux users are AM> waiting for and are willing to pay for a TB! port when it comes? I didn't actually say "The Bat!" What I said was

Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading

Hello TB Lists, Just thought I'd let those of you who use counters in your subject with a reply (i.e. Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0) that it messes up the threading in my newsreader (i.e. Agent 1.93) when I pull from Gmane. Not that you really care about my newsreader because I do NOT. I figure you may care

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 owGtkrFu01AUhkMLDFY9FF7g79QiEsd2myJZJYiqKAmoJWqCChISuk5O4kttX+N7 0+AFiY0RiamCAYSAia1SB8TCA/QF6NyJhQdA4jgVb8Dd7j33/85/fp3X9nxlbvHK 5bdvfp6dPb/wde5juPBinI1NLgpnEGe3f4RX2xTHCj0SadW2bOt+in40qcJbxxYN 4LvuGnw/WGsEXgPXXT6t7T5WvP

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

Hello Sean, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 4:45:15 PM, Sean Rima wrote: >> It is a pity that all my good sigs come from Thunderbird and not from >> the Bat! :-( > This one is good and I belive it came via TB! Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I think they were

Re: Spam on the increase

Hello Roger, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 9:41:38 PM, Roger Phillips wrote: MM>> Just keep feeding BayesIt with spam and ham continually, to keep it in good shape :-) > This is NOT enough Maxim. I'd have to agree. Either bayesian filtering has gone by the wayside because spammers have gotten

Re[2]: Spam on the increase

Hello Maxim, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 1:13:58 PM, among other things, you wrote: >>Is it just me or is anyone else noticing an increase in the amount of >>spam that's fooling BayesIt? No, not just you. I've wondered whether Bayesit has been working at all lately. MM> Just keep feeding

Re: automaticly closing down

Hello Kevin, On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:12:19 -0500GMT (12-12-2004, 18:12 +0100, where I live), you wrote: KC> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:37:49 +0100 (11:37 AM here), Henk de Bruijn KC> [HdB] wrote in : KC>>> ... Are you running any plugins with The Bat! ? HdB>> No, on the new co

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Maxim, A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 15:52:05 GMT +0100 MM> Not yet. "Not Yet" isn't a "No" so that's a good sign. MM> I don't think so. That's a good sign as well. MM> I'm quite interested in the list of Linux users who are all waiting fo

Re: GnuPG - free form primary UID not recognized

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, on Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:19:48 +0100GMT, I wrote: PM> I played around with GnuPG a bit, and set up a free form primary user PM> ID (just my name, no e-mail, no comment). TB! doesn't seem to like PM> this. If I have to sign or decrypt anything,

Re: Spam on the increase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Stuart, I'm struggling to get TB to collect mail via SpamPal In the account's transport options I've got Server: myExchangeSvr Username: stuarth password: Port: 110 And I've changed it to Server: 127.0.0.1 Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pas

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:44:41 +0100GMT, you wrote: >> Two: I'd like to have an option to save decrypted messages. Encryption >> is fine for transmission, but I don't need them necessarily encrypted >> on my computer. It was possible up to ve

Re: Quotation problems (Was: Re: Spam on the increase)

Hello Mic, A reminder of what Mic Cullen on TBBETA typed on: 16 December 2004 at 23:34:35 GMT +0100 MC> Any ideas? I've hunted through the prefs, etc, but as we all know, it's not as MC> intuitive as it could be At first glance I'd say it was because you had a chevron before AND after hi

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Hemming on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 16:04:40 GMT +0100 SH> "Software Company Cancels Christmas!" That'll give them more time to work on the Linux port :) -- Best regards,Tony. ___

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

Hello Henk, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 8:07:06 PM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Bad sig? Good sig :) Sean -- ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431 i think i'd rather be a cat... sleep

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexander, on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:12:21 +0100GMT, you wrote: ASK>>> Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is "- -- " (with space before CR) and its ASK>>> not recognized by the RTV as signature, but recognized & stripped ASK>>> when replying. Henks PGP-sig-del

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hi Dierk, >> :-) I meant the HD of the person recieving the encrypted mail. No need >> to encrypt everything twice. > You use an encrypted NTFS partition? Or a similar scheme, even PGPDisk > or similar? Yes for the first question. I'm on the bright side here, I work in a company producing such st

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Alexander, A reminder of what Alexander Leschinsky on TBBETA typed on: 16 December 2004 at 22:50:47 GMT +0100 AL> Mahogany Tried it... 1/10 AL> Sylpheed-Claws Tried that today... 4/10 AL> Mozilla Tried it... 1/10 AL> Thunderbird Tried it... 0/10 AL> Gnus Never tried it... AL>

Re: Spam on the increase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MM> Just keep feeding BayesIt with spam and ham continually, to keep it in good shape :-) Trust me I am. Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder that BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain nothing that

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hi Peter Fjelsten, On 15/12/2004 8:45 AM, you wrote: I hope you will fix the hanging IMAP tasks before that... Yep. I've been trying for the last couple days but it's an intolerable problem at present. Problems with beta 10 and IMAP: - as was said before; frequently hanging connections. This has

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Michael, A reminder of what Michael Schneider on TBBETA typed on: 15 December 2004 at 16:40:06 GMT +0100 MS> At least most of this software doesn't cost any money But I'm not expecting something for nothing. MS> And for email-clients: I don't any bugs in kmail. It works superb MS> her

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hi Dierk, >> If your hard drive is encrypted you don't have to think about stuff >> like that :-) > The trouble isn't *my* HD but yours (when I send you a message) ... :-) I meant the HD of the person recieving the encrypted mail. No need to encrypt everything twice. And normally that would be f

Re: Quotation problems (Was: Re: Spam on the increase)

At 23:06 [GMT+] on Thursday December 16 (actual time - 7:06am on Friday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: [snips] MC>> Any ideas? I've hunted through the prefs, etc, but as we all know, it's not as MC>> intuitive as it could be Tony> At first glance I'd say it was because you had

can not use new GnuPG version 1.4.0

Hello TBBETA I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand trying to send a signed message I got the message: gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available. With Thunderbird 1.0 there is no problem: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 testing nieuwe versie Gnu

Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0

Hello Henk, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 10:18:46 PM, you wrote: >>> Bad sig? SR>> Good sig :) SR>> Sean > It is a pity that all my good sigs come from Thunderbird and not from > the Bat! :-( This one is good and I belive it came via TB! Sean -- ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL

Quotation problems (Was: Re: Spam on the increase)

G'day Tbbeta, I'm having serious difficulties with my quoting, and it's driving me mad. I presume I've changed something, but I'm stuffed if I can figure out what it is. As you can see from my reply to the previous thread, (shown below), it shows the name of the person being quoted fine, but doe

Re: Spam on the increase

At 12:54 [GMT+0100] on Thursday December 16 (actual time - 7:54pm on Thursday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: [snips] Peter> For me the by far most effective is SpamPal Yeah, same here. I tried a couple of other solutions, but went back to SpamPal and am very happy. -- cheers, Mic (r

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Sean, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:51:03 +GMT (16-12-2004, 21:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SR> Thursday, December 16, 2004, 8:07:06 PM, you wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> Bad sig? SR> Good sig :) SR> Sean

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Peter! On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 8:07:46 PM you wrote: > I haven't had such messages yet, so this doesn't pose a problem here. How d'you know? It could well be that one or two of my messages to you don't pose a problem today but how about tomorrow? My usual example starts on Januar

Re[4]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello NetVicious, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:56:38 +0100 (16.12.2004 4:56 my local time), received Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 12:31:21 +0500, you wrote about "Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat", at least in part: N> A lot of people are waiting for a GNU/Linux TB ve

Re: can not use new GnuPG version 1.4.0

Henk de Bruijn schreef: Hello TBBETA I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand trying to send a signed message I got the message: gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available. With Thunderbird 1.0 there is no problem: testing nieuwe versie GnuPG Please can you solve t

Re: automaticly closing down

Hi Henk, On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:30 +0100 (2:56 PM here), Henk de Bruijn [HdB] wrote in : HdB> Can you let me know which settings I have to use for the Bat! to HdB> avoid conflicts with GPGrelay. I sent and encrypted reply offlist. -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hi TBBeta, > I am far from being an MS basher but do I remember correctly that > there might be a kind of super key with the US authorities?! Doesn't matter I'm not working for Microsoft, so there is no super key for the US authorities. >> CDs for archiving aren't a problem :-) > You have to enc

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Peter Meyns & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 22:04 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: ASK>> Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is "- -- " (with space before CR) and its ASK>> not recognized by the RTV as signature, but recognized & stripped ASK>> when replying. Henks PGP-sig-delimiter is "- --" (no space bef

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Raymund! On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 9:47:29 PM you wrote: > Yes for the first question. With PGPDisk (and several other utilities for HD encryption) you can see for yourself how good it works. For NTFS ... I am far from being an MS basher but do I remember correctly that there migh

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Alexander, > from Henk de Bruijn good sig :) > and Peter Meyns? bad sig :( I tested it with different PGP-Sigs (- --), it happens only with the messages of Peter. WinXP/SP1 v2.12.04 + v3.02.10 -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://t

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexander, on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:49:40 +0100GMT, you wrote: ASK> Can you please check the two last messages from Henk de Bruijn and Peter ASK> Meyns? ASK> Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is "- -- " (with space before CR) and its not ASK> recognized by

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Raymund Thomas Tump & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 21:47 you (Raymund Thomas Tump) wrote: > Why? If you send your message encrypted, you can't make sure that it > stays encrypted, can you? If there is an option in TB! that you can > save decrypted messages, some will use it some not. S

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Miroslav Florensen & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 21:20 you (Miroslav Florensen) wrote: >> ...confirmations? > not confirmed under > Win98/SE + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10 > Win2000/SP4 TB! v2.12.04 + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10 Can you please check the two last messages from Henk de

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Henk, on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:07:06 +0100GMT, you wrote: HdB> Bad sig? Nope. :-)) gpg: Signature made 12/16/04 21:07:06 Westeuropäische Normalzeit using DSA key ID DBE6E678 gpg: Good signature from "Henk M. de Bruijn" gpg: aka ..

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Alexander, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 20:07:42 +0100, (which is 16.12.2004 at 21:07:42 +2000 where I live), you wrote: >> Not confirmed, the setting applies both "- --" and "-- " > Sure? Please check the attached pictures. sig-std.png is your message (sig > in monospace font, light grey), sig-

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Raymund! On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 9:08:06 PM you wrote: > :-) I meant the HD of the person recieving the encrypted mail. No need > to encrypt everything twice. You use an encrypted NTFS partition? Or a similar scheme, even PGPDisk or similar? Not only do I have to rely on the fac

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Alexander, > ...confirmations? not confirmed under Win98/SE + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10 Win2000/SP4 TB! v2.12.04 + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10 -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml __

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Zeynel & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 20:19 you (Zeynel) wrote: > Maybe Peter Meyns's PGP sig-limiter is malformed? Seems so. But TB recognizes it when you reply. Odd. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using TB! v3.0.2.10 Home on Windows XP Pro Se

Re: can not use new GnuPG version 1.4.0

Hello Peter, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:00:43 +0100GMT (16-12-2004, 21:00 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PM> At least: PM> gpg: Signature made 12/16/04 20:30:49 Westeuropäische PM> Normalzeit using DSA key ID DBE6E678 PM> gpg: Good signature from "Henk M. de Bruijn" PM> gpg: aka ...

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Alexander, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 19:47:29 +0100, (which is 16.12.2004 at 20:47:29 +2000 where I live), you wrote: > I'm using the RTV; its configured to display sigs (those with a correct sig > delimiter *g*) in a different color. This works only with the standard sig > delimiter "-- " but

GnuPG 1.4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bad sig? - -- cheers, Henk __ Thunderbird 1.0 with Enigmail on Windows XP SP2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http:

Re: can not use new GnuPG version 1.4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Henk, on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:46:06 +0100GMT, you wrote: HdB> I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand HdB> trying to send a signed message I got the message: HdB> gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available. At lea

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Raymund! On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 8:18:36 PM you wrote: > If your hard drive is encrypted you don't have to think about stuff > like that :-) The trouble isn't *my* HD but yours (when I send you a message) ... -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Wind

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Alexander, > Actually, none of the "attributes" (font, color, style) for signatures is > applied to the "pgp signature delimiter delimited signature" :-) > ...confirmations? confirmed here WinXP/SP1 TB!3.02.10 + TB!v2.12.04 -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.

Re: AV when deleting IMAP account

Hello Alexander, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 17:32:40 +0100, (which is 16.12.2004 at 18:32:40 +2000 where I live), you wrote: > created a new (empty) IMAP account, no configuration except the absolute > minimum (as required by the new account wizard). Deleted the account again, > gives AV: Confirmed

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hi Dierk, > Doesn't make much sense if I send you a message with some > incriminating (lets imagine I live in Russia, Saudi-Arabia or China) > contents and you save a decrypted version. If your hard drive is encrypted you don't have to think about stuff like that :-) -- I'm already gone, Raymun

PGP: wishes refreshed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, there are two minor issues in my daily use of PGP/GPG with The Bat!, but still I'd like them fixed: One: I'd like The Bat! to automatically check PGP signatures, when the message is selected. I saw this in KMail and Sylpheed, and it is indeed

Re: Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello Zeynel & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 20:00 you (Zeynel) wrote: >> I'm using the RTV; its configured to display sigs (those with a correct >> sig delimiter *g*) in a different color. This works only with the >> standard sig delimiter "-- " but not with the pgp delimiter "- --". > Not c

Re: AV when deleting IMAP account

Hello Zeynel & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 19:19 you (Zeynel) wrote: >> created a new (empty) IMAP account, no configuration except the absolute >> minimum (as required by the new account wizard). Deleted the account >> again, gives AV: > Confirmed with same addresses. Then I re-created an

Display bug with sig delimiter

Hello everyone, I'm using the RTV; its configured to display sigs (those with a correct sig delimiter *g*) in a different color. This works only with the standard sig delimiter "-- " but not with the pgp delimiter "- --". The sig with the pgp delimiter is stripped correctly when replying, but its

Re: AV when deleting IMAP account

Hello Alexander, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 19:35:03 +0100, (which is 16.12.2004 at 20:35:03 +2000 where I live), you wrote: > creating/deleting a POP3 account is no problem here (no AVs). No problems with creating/deleting POP3 accounts here either. -- Best regards, Zeynel :flag-turkey: Running T

Re: PGP: wishes refreshed

Hello Peter! On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 7:33:18 PM you wrote: > Two: I'd like to have an option to save decrypted messages. Encryption > is fine for transmission, but I don't need them necessarily encrypted > on my computer. It was possible up to version 1.6? I think. Wholeheartedly agree

Re: A Joke? Export to VCF!

Hello Christian Grams & everyone else, on 16-Dez-2004 at 09:17 you (Christian Grams) wrote: > That is exactly what i did! I only wanted to export 1 entry - and for > some reason ALL are put into the VCF Please, don't mind that I have my doubts that you really picked the correct option... I made

Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:48:55 -0500, AC Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - wrong message bodies being displayed for messages actually selected. > This seems to be triggered by new messages being added to the folder as > you browse it. I'm not sure though. An awful one, that one. :/ I see you'v

Re[2]: A Joke? Export to VCF!

ASK> Please, don't mind that I have my doubts that you really picked the correct ASK> option... I made exactly the same mistake yesterday evening. ASK> Select a single entry in the AB ASK> Open the "File" menu ASK> Select "Export" ASK> - do *not* select "VCF" now! ASK> Select "Export Selection" AS

Re: AV after uninstalling BayesIt

Hello you schmuck, answering yourself again? on 16-Dez-2004 at 17:29 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote: > trying to open the "Options" menu after uninstalling BayesIt gives the > following AV: > --- The Bat! --- > Access violation at address 0081F051 i

AV when deleting IMAP account

Hello everyone, created a new (empty) IMAP account, no configuration except the absolute minimum (as required by the new account wizard). Deleted the account again, gives AV: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 006DE3FD in module 'thebat.ex

AV after uninstalling BayesIt

Hello, trying to open the "Options" menu after uninstalling BayesIt gives the following AV: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 0081F051 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 1003AEA8. --- OK --

Re: Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:17:04 +0100, Michael Schneider > It's a problem with TB!'s cache. If you move a message to another > folder and don't clear the cache, the next got message will be shown > as the old you just moved. Only solution: clearing cache ... I've experienced this problem for a whil

Re: Spam on the increase

Stuart, On 16-12-2004 15:14, you [SH] wrote in : SH> And I've changed it to SH> Server: 127.0.0.1 SH> Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SH> password: SH> Port: 110 SH> SpamPal complains about the port (110) being in use. I've tried I don't know about Exchange servers - but

Re[4]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

Hello Maxim, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 3:02:23 AM, you wrote: >>>The DBCS support of v3.02 series is bad. Do you have any plan to improve it? >>>Or delay it to later beta cycle? MM> Do you speak about the MicroEd editor? No, I mean the windows editor. From v3.022 beta, the windows editor mod

Re: Spam on the increase

On Thursday 16 December 2004 11:54, Peter Fjelsten wrote: > For me the by far most effective is SpamPal - due to the combination of > Bayesian, peer-to-peer and public blacklists. Since I started using MDaemon as my own mail server I've not seen any spam. Mailwasher pro is very good. -- Tony.

Re: Spam on the increase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Not from here. It's working now. - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.5, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1.2). PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com Anything worth

Re: Spam on the increase

Hello Stuart, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 12:24:11 PM, you wrote: > Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder that > BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain nothing > that I might not expect to find in a regular message, little jokes, > quotations fro

Re: Spam on the increase

Hello Stuart! On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 12:24:11 PM you wrote: > Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder that > BayesIt is failing to catch it. I tried it when you first asked by before sending the message I was successful in stalling my machine completely ...

Re: Spam on the increase

Stuart, On 16-12-2004 12:43, you [SH] wrote in : SH> Thanks, I'll try and follow that up between Christmas and New Year SH> whilst it's quiet in the office. I might have been unclear: * BayesIt has Bayesian * Bayes Filter has Bayesian and public blacklists * SpamPal (wit

Re: Spam on the increase

Stuart, On 16-12-2004 12:46, you [SH] wrote in : PF>> (SpamPal plugin home PF>> ). SH> The site seems to be down. Not from here. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.0.1.33 Pro ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (

Re: Spam on the increase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> (SpamPal plugin home PF> ). The site seems to be down. - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.5, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v

Re: Spam on the increase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Effective spam filtering needs more strings to play on [snip] Thanks, I'll try and follow that up between Christmas and New Year whilst it's quiet in the office. - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service P

Re: Spam on the increase

Stuart, On 16-12-2004 12:24, you [SH] wrote in : SH> Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder SH> that BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain SH> nothing that I might not expect to find in a regular message, little SH> jokes, qu

Re: Spam on the increase

Hello Shemming, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 11:57:57, you wrote: >>Is it just me or is anyone else noticing an increase in the amount of >>spam that's fooling BayesIt? Just keep feeding BayesIt with spam and ham continually, to keep it in good shape :-) -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Spam on the increase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is it just me or is anyone else noticing an increase in the amount of spam that's fooling BayesIt? - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.5, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1.2). P

Re[2]: A Joke? Export to VCF!

FW> If you open this file in an editor it looks like your complete FW> addressbook ;-) FW> Did you try the method File/Export to/Export selection to export FW> a single entry? That is exactly what i did! I only wanted to export 1 entry - and for some reason ALL are put into the VCF and it seems