Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:13:44 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome Jack Morrison & everyone else, > on 07-Aug-2005 at 20:14 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: >>> And btw. - when you copy the old account folders and their subfolders back >>> into place, you'll al

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:30:54 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Jack, > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:13:36 -0400GMT (7-8-2005, 21:13 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: >>> It means, just go ahead with what you are doing anyway. Forget about >>> the registry key (that .reg file) you have. You don't need it any m

Re[4]: Jack's announces his new "upgrade" policy for TB

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:23:03 PM, you wrote: > Jack, >>> Give it a rest. >> No thanks. > Please reconsider and move on. I'm sure Roelof or Marck will > eventually agree, too. That's always possible. I'd accept it, of course, but I wouldn't understand it. Unless, of course, you're only welc

Re[2]: Jack's announces his new "upgrade" policy for TB

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 4:30:46 PM, you wrote: [] >> And maybe not even then. > Give it a rest. No thanks. > You are getting quite boring. Then don't bother to read my posts. Easy, right? Or do you just enjoy ankle-biting? That's what I thought. -- Best regards, Jack __

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 2:36:58 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome, > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:00 -0400 GMT (08/08/2005, 01:15 +0700 GMT), > Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: >>> Since TB is running on your machine now, just go ahead and continue >>> setting up accounts.

Jack's announces his new "upgrade" policy for TB

Jack will next "upgrade" his two copies of The Bat to "newer" versions only three years *after* all of the following things occur: 1. It snows in Miami, Florida in August. 2. A cure for cancer is found. 3. The Chicago Cubs win the World Series. 4. Microsoft files for bankruptcy protection. 5. Osa

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 1:26:06 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:31:24 -0400 GMT (06/08/2005, 23:31 +0700 GMT), > Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: HJM>> Can I do that now(close TB and double-click on that file), or should I HJM>> wait until after I hav

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 1:24:54 PM, you wrote: [] > Exactly. You copy the contents of the old account folder (your old "John > Doe" directory) over the contents of the new account directory. > But wait! > Before you copy the old files over the new files, *please* back up the > *new* files to a d

Re[2]: Reward offered!

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 11:52:34 PM, you wrote: > Hi Handsome, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, at 21:08:41 [GMT-0400] (which was Sun, 11:08:41 > Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: >> But thanks again for all of your help and your especially warm response! >> Sheesh. > Time to relax! Time to actually

Re[4]: Reward offered!

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 10:59:24 AM, you wrote: HJM>> And thanks to the help of several folks here, and for which I HJM>> will always be grateful, I have now managed to salvage my old key HJM>> from an old backup, too, and that pathetic nag screen is finally HJM>> gone. > If you provide S/N

Re[2]: Reward offered!

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 11:52:34 PM, you wrote: > Hi Handsome, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, at 21:08:41 [GMT-0400] (which was Sun, 11:08:41 > Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: >> But thanks again for all of your help and your especially warm response! >> Sheesh. > Time to relax! That's easy for y

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:45:34 AM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome Jack Morrison & everyone else, > on 07-Aug-2005 at 00:57 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: >> Will there be conflicts because of that, if and when I ever do attempt to >> re-import the "old" data

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 8:34:12 PM, you wrote: [] >> Now, when I did setup these "new" Accounts, I used different names for >> each of them (different from their "old" names). > Now why do that? Why complicate the issue? Well, I wasn't sure that's what I was doing. >> Will there be conflicts

Re[2]: Reward offered!

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 8:27:48 PM, you wrote: > Hi Handsome, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, at 19:19:28 [GMT-0400] (which was Sun, 9:19:28 > Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: >> I'm offering a $100,000 reward for the name and address of the *sick* SOB at >> Ritlabs who designed the nag screen to keep

Re: Mod: Personal Attack (was: Reward offered!)

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 7:22:45 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Jack, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 19:19:28 -0400GMT (7-8-2005, 1:19 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: JM>> May he one day have a thousand camels s*&t upon his head while he's sleeping. > > Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all

Reward offered!

I'm offering a $100,000 reward for the name and address of the *sick* SOB at Ritlabs who designed the nag screen to keep popping up after *each* and *every* action I take, and to make matters worse, to keep switching sides of the screen's "Exit" and "Okay" buttons. May he one day have a thousand c

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 6:10:40 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome Jack Morrison & everyone else, > on 06-Aug-2005 at 20:01 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: >> But only after I drop by my church and say a little prayer. > :-) > So, how are things going? Well, I h

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 3:43:11 PM, you wrote: [] >> Hi, Gorgeous! > Oh, my! You certainly do know the way to the hearts of 78-year-old > women! I happen to like older women. Especially when they know as much about TB as you do. Care to join me for drinks? My wife will be joining us, of cou

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 1:54:27 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome! Hi, Gorgeous! [] > Sorry. It says that you should write to Support at The Bat! Tell them > about your purchase of the key from CifNet. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, thanks. I just wrote them. [] > Hope your time-out with beer wa

Re[3]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 1:29:56 PM, you wrote: [] > I've been thinking, and while that's always dangerous for me, I think > I want to start over again with a clean slate. > New settings, new filters, new preferences, etc. (now that I've got > several of my Accounts working again, I've stopped p

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:54:26 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Roelof, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:39:58 +0200GMT (6-8-2005, 18:39 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: RO>> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RegistrationBlock > After some testing I found that this is the one you need. Roelef, how do

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:23:01 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome! > On Saturday, August 06, 2005, 11:11 AM, you wrote: >> How can I get this resolved? > RL will sell you a new key, IIRC, for about $3.00, if you have > completely lost your key that you got for 3.xx. Mary, I'd gladly pay $3.00

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:39:58 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Jack, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:11:14 -0400GMT (6-8-2005, 18:11 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: JM>> However, it won't accept my registration key. > Did you make a copy of your registry as Thomas and Alexander both > explained? Yes. >

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:23:32 PM, you wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:11 -0400, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: >> How can I get this resolved? > You can restore the registry backup you've made, it will contain the > registration information. But I have to restore all

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

Friday, August 5, 2005, 5:51:20 PM, you wrote: [] HJM>> No, he didn't explain how to backup the registry key, so it was a HJM>> good opportunity for you to do so, or so I would have thought. > Close TB. > Windows: Start / Run / Regedit. > The registry editor will open. > Find the key HK_Curren

Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

Well, I'm trying to follow Alexander's instructions; I've backed everything up (I think), I've installed a new copy of The Bat, and I've managed to get one Account working, so at least I can make/receive posts to this mail list(unfortunately, I have 9 Accounts to go). However, it won't accept my r

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

[] >> I'm not even sure that I'm skilled enough to do all of those things. >Its not so difficult. If you can copy files and install/uninstall program, >you're almost there. We'll see. >I didn't describe how to back up the registry settings, but thats not >difficult, either. >Click Start, Run

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

ed fish, I'd be up and running by now and able to fully comply with the list's rules. I'm not a scoflaw by nature. No, I'm not in a very good mood right now. And if you think that you're "annoyed"... Jack -----Original Message- From: Thomas Fernandez <

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

of the folks here I was eventually able to recover them. But I don't like the way these troubles keep popping up. Fool me once... :( Jack -Original Message- From: "Alexander S. Kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Aug 3, 2005 3:09 PM To: Handsome Jack Morrison on TBUD

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek appears to have abandoned me. Does anyone else have any ideas about how I can get my Bat back? Thanks! Jack -Original Message- From: Handsome Jack Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 29, 2005 5:28 PM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won&

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

AIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 29, 2005 9:24 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Friday, July 29, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: > Marek, okay. Tonight I'll find the "account.srb" file, back it up, > remove it, and the

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

k -Original Message- From: Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 29, 2005 8:00 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Friday, July 29, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: > Marek, I tried what you recommended last nigh

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Marek, I tried what you recommended last night, but TB still freezes at the splash screen and won't load. This is the error message I get: szAppName : thebat.exe szAppVer : 3.51.10.0 szModName : hungapp szModVer : 0.0.0.0 offset : Any other ideas? -- Jack _

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

Message- From: Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 28, 2005 9:28 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Thursday, July 28, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: > The program FREEZES at the opening splash screen. try to bac

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

-Original Message- From: Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 28, 2005 9:28 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Thursday, July 28, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: >> The program FREEZES at the opening spl

Re: New version of The Bat won't load!

-Original Message- From: Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 28, 2005 8:38 AM To: tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Subject: Re: New version of The Bat won't load! Hello all, Thursday, July 28, 2005, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: > ...nothing... Oh, come on now. It

New version won't load...

Yesterday, I downloaded the new version and installed it. Unfortunately, it won't load...it freezes at the opening splash screen, and I get a Microsoft error message asking for permission to send it along to Microsoft, etc. I reinstalled it several times, same result. I rebooted several times

New version of The Bat won't load!

Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Help! My Address book has disappeared! (after "upgrading" to vs 3.5)

Jack Morrison @ 2005-Jun-5 7:31:37 PM "Help! My Address book has disappeared! (after "upgrading" to vs 3.5)" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I'm going out now and have a few cold ones, in celebration of the >> Return of My Address Book. >How about you

ASMTP?

I just received this message from my provider: To use EarthLink's Authenticated SMTP (ASMTP) server to send email from your EarthLink email address, you need to make a one-time change to the settings in your email program. Your settings should be changed to: Server address: smtpauth.earthlink.net

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 12:35:00 PM, you wrote: > Hello Jack, > Monday, March 8, 2004, 11:11:54 AM, you wrote: Jack>> 1. Does this mean that tbudl will now become an official Usenet Jack>> *newsgroup? > On Gmane's servers, yes. Check. Jack>> 2. Can one subscribe to it as one would normally subs

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 2:44:09 PM, you wrote: [] JM>> Additionally, what kind of posts aren't archive-able? > Those bearing the header "X-No-Archive: Yes" will not be archived. So, in other words, if I've added "X-No-Archive: Yes" to my headers, then the only place where my message will ever app

Re[3]: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 1:11:53 PM, you wrote: >>> Your [GMane] e-mail address will be encrypted and overly difficult >>> for spammers to harvest. > How is this done, can we see some examples of this in action BEFOE we > panic? Rich, here's a pretty good explanation of how it works, but I agree,

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

Does anyone have the name of this new Gmane newsgroup yet? -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silver

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 12:36:37 PM, you wrote: > Dear Jack, > @8-Mar-2004, 12:11 -0600 (08-Mar 18:11 UK time) Jack Morrison [JM] > in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: JM>> Marck, I missed most of the original discussions regarding this JM>> subject, so I have a f

Re: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 12:02:44 PM, you wrote: > Can someone actually explain what GMane is! > Is it a Newsgroup, some private forum, a Yahoo! group ? > Do we change anything here or do we just continue reading / responding > to message as they arise like now? > Later: Having Googled for GMane

Re: GMane - here we come

Monday, March 8, 2004, 10:50:46 AM, you wrote: > Hi T'Buddlers, > Well, having asked for objections to the idea of reflecting the TB > lists to GMane to provide access to the list in a News format, we > haven't received any that stood up to scrutiny. Marck, I missed most of the original discussi

Re[6]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 9:31:24 PM, you wrote: [] JM>> but I *BUY* a car as much for its looks as for its ability to get me JM>> around. > You talked about a Ferrari, and Italian designers. Being European, I can > assure you Italian cars _stink_, they rust once you put your sweaty feet > in them

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 8:08:47 PM, you wrote: [] JM>> I'm sorry that both you and Miquel feel this way. So I apologize for JM>> upsetting you this much. But one is forced to wonder after this, what JM>> little it would probably take to cause the both of you (especially JM>> you, Peter) to suff

Re[4]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 8:03:46 PM, you wrote: > At 8:30 PM on 3/6/2004, Jack Morrison typed ... J>> And lastly, I apologize for apologizing so much. > So anyone who questions your observations is opposed to constructive > criticism? Martin, Thomas, Stefan, and Greg were all a

Re[4]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 7:48:38 PM, you wrote: > Hello Jack! > On Saturday, March 06, 2004, 7:30 PM, you wrote: JM>> Shame on me! > Yes, Jack, for using unwarranted sarcasm in a discussion that is > mainly about personal preferences. Boy, we just don't see the world through the same prism, do

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 7:02:04 PM, you wrote: > Hi MAU, > on Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:45:39 +0100GMT, you wrote: M>> With all due respect Jack, this is one of the most annoying threads I've M>> ever read. Long but content empty. Come on! Be serious! Most people want M>> an email client to send and r

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 3:54:31 PM, you wrote: [] JM>> It's annoying. > It would be more annoying to have separators thinner because many > people will have problems positioning the mouse pointer in order to > drag them :-) Stefan, with all due respect, no one said anything about wanting them t

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 3:23:22 PM, you wrote: [] JM>> Rumor has it that some people even liked the looks of the AMC Pacer, JM>> too. JM>> Four people, to be exact. ;) > Is that a car or a PDA? It's a car that looked like a PDA. :) -- Best regards, Jack Using The Bat! 2.04.7 on Windows 5

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 2:41:50 PM, you wrote: [] >>> I like it that way... JM>> Then pictures hanging on the wall unevenly and/or off-center probably JM>> don't bother people like you as much as they do people like me. > Oh, but they do... Yabbut, do you walk over to them and set them straigh

Re[3]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 1:25:53 PM, you wrote: JM>>> Again, it's a very minor cosmetic bugaboo, but it's annoying JM>>> nonetheless. MW>> I like it that way... the main horizontal and vertical dividers are the MW>> same width and separate three things: folder tree, message list and MW>> message p

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Saturday, March 6, 2004, 12:54:17 PM, you wrote: [] JM>> Again, it's a very minor cosmetic bugaboo, but it's annoying JM>> nonetheless. JM>> At least it is to those of us who are easily annoyed. :) > You said it! :-) > I like it that way... Then pictures hanging on the wall unevenly and/or off

Re[2]: Unequal gaps

Friday, March 5, 2004, 8:43:31 PM, you wrote: > Hello Jack, > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:11:40 -0600 GMT (06/03/2004, 02:11 +0700 GMT), > Jack Morrison wrote: >> Is it possible for the nice folks at Ritlabs to do something about the >> differences in the gaps that separate th

Unequal gaps

Minor cosmetic complaint: Is it possible for the nice folks at Ritlabs to do something about the differences in the gaps that separate the various information panels? It's annoying. The vertical gaps are unequal in width; likewise the horizontal gaps. But...kudos to the new download bar in the

Re[2]: Another "This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting"?!?

Friday, January 9, 2004, 3:13:54 PM, you wrote: > Hi Jack, > on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500GMT (01.10.03, 22:25 +0200GMT here), > you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : JM>> Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:57:11 +0100 JM>> Received: from . JM>> . for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan

Re[3]: Another "This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting"?!?

Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:25:03 PM, you wrote: > Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: >> Hello Jack, >> Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote: JM>>> If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. >> Thanks... JM>>> Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never mak

Re[2]: Removing from this list.

Friday, January 9, 2004, 11:47:22 AM, you wrote: > Hello Mark, > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:49:48 -0600 GMT (09/01/2004, 06:49 +0700 GMT), > Mark Thomas wrote: >> I deleted the email that tells me how to subscribe/unsubscribe from >> this list. > No problem. >> Can someone forward the Unsubsc

Re[2]: Another "This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting"?!?

Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: > Hello Jack, > Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote: JM>> If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. > Thanks... JM>> Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM>> happy, but you're getting close enough

Re[5]: Toolbar(s)

Saturday, October 4, 2003, 12:07:23 PM, you wrote: > Hi Jack > Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 3:02:04 PM, you wrote: JM>> Any idea what "flat toolbars" even are? I haven't a clue. > Look at the toolbars. And the menu names above. The toolbars are always elevated > above the level of the menu name

Re: TB! documentation poor

Wednesday, December 24, 2003, 1:00:22 AM, you wrote: > I don't believe I would be able to make use of TB! as much as I do > without this list and I really hardly even scrape the surface. It's > a powerful piece of software, but that power is buried. "I second that emotion." > How many out there

Re[5]: Is everyone having problems with CE?

Thursday, December 11, 2003, 1:26:40 PM, you wrote: [] >> I suppose you could try rummaging through the settings in the Printer >> Setup (Message - Print Setup) and just checking that everything in >> there still looks sensible... > I rebooted. Still, no printing. I mucked around in Print Setup,

Re[4]: Is everyone having problems with CE?

Thursday, December 11, 2003, 12:41:40 PM, you wrote: JM>> Can anyone else confirm this? > Nope, sorry - I just printed out both your messages without problems. > The first time, I had the Message Auto-View on. Just to be sure, I > then turned it off and printed your second message. > I suppose y

Re[2]: Is everyone having problems with CE?

Thursday, December 11, 2003, 9:59:04 AM, you wrote: > Hello Richard, > Thursday, December 11, 2003, 1:28:39 PM, you wrote: RHS>> I've read some of the problems people are having with the new 2.02CE RHS>> release. I've never had any problems before when upgrading,but have RHS>> hesitated this tim

Re[2]: Is everyone having problems with CE?

Thursday, December 11, 2003, 9:59:04 AM, you wrote: > Hello Richard, > Thursday, December 11, 2003, 1:28:39 PM, you wrote: RHS>> I've read some of the problems people are having with the new 2.02CE RHS>> release. I've never had any problems before when upgrading,but have RHS>> hesitated this tim

Re[2]: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Tuesday, December 9, 2003, 6:03:53 PM, you wrote: > Hi Edgar, > On Tuesday, December 09, 2003, at 12:01:58 PM PST, you wrote: >> New Edition > Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders and > completely start over with arranging message list columns, threading > and sorting prefe

Re: Purchased the Bat!

Sunday, October 26, 2003, 6:01:14 AM, you wrote: > 3. Sparse documentation > I'm not one to depend a great deal on documentation, but the online > help for The Bat is among the sparsest I've ever seen, and it's a > complex product. I can usually figure out things on my own, That's good news, An

Re[2]: TheBat! on a blacklist?

Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:08:54 AM, you wrote: > 10/19/2003, 9:53 PM: Jack said in "TheBat! on a blacklist?" JM>> Maybe the nice folks at Ritlabs! will: JM>> 2. Change it on *their* end. > Last night in TBBETA Stefan said: > "There will be a new 2.01 build tonight or tomorrow with more fixe

Re[2]: TheBat! on a blacklist?

Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:39:07 PM, you wrote: JM>> Question: Does it need to be hacked each time I install a new update? > Your welcome, yes, you will have to do it with each new version. > Maybe I can look into making a patch with each version that can just > be run to automate the job. Mayb

Re[2]: TheBat! on a blacklist?

Sunday, October 19, 2003, 6:14:20 PM, you wrote: > This is what the original will look like (although line numbers may > be different as this was version 2) > http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_hack2.gif > And this is what you will change it too > http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/bat_

Re[2]: 2.01.00 Release

Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 10:38:01 PM, you wrote: [] > Digital signing has been a long time supported feature in TB. > TB 2 adds the following: > 1) The flagging of MIME signed messages in the message list. Thus the new yellow checkmark, I assume. Thanks for the explanation! -- Best regard

Re[2]: 2.01.00 Release

Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 9:12:31 PM, you wrote: > It means that my messages are PGP/MIME signed and that (if you use > PGP or GnuPG) you can verify 1) that they come from me and 2) that > they are unchanged. Thanks, Marck (and Allie)! I assume it's new in v2.01? -- Best regards, Jack

Re: 2.01.00 Release

Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 6:54:53 PM, you wrote: [] Okay...what's the yellow checkmark in the envelope (in the Message List window) mean?? It's popped up on your last two messages, Marck. -- Best regards, Jack Current version is 2.01 |

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Friday, October 3, 2003, 6:45:46 AM, you wrote: > When I do post, I re-read my > email many times to look for possible errors and to make sure that my > meaning is clear and not subject to misinterpretation. And as Martha Stewart would say, that's a "good thing." -- Best regards, Jack

Re[2]: Another "This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting"?!?

Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: JM>> Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM>> happy, but you're getting close enough for government work. > Since I work for the gov't that makes it just fine! ;-) I should probably quit while I'm ahead, eh? :) -- B

Re[2]: Another "This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting"?!?

Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:43:24 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Jack, > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: JM>> I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually JM>> need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be th

Re[2]: Another "This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting"?!?

Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:10:41 AM, you wrote: [] > I've had this same conversation with Yuki off-list. Marck, Allie and I > have been moderating the TB lists for ages now. We've just about tried > every form and fashion of moderation known to mankind, and we stick > with what works for us ove

Re[3]: Toolbar(s)

Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 11:47:48 PM, you wrote: > Any idea if flat toolbars are on the cards? They would contribute enormously to > TB's interface and make it much more contemporary. Any idea what "flat toolbars" even are? I haven't a clue. But then, I often don't. :) -- Best regards, J

Re[2]: Blocking Bat mail

Thursday, September 18, 2003, 8:40:57 PM, you wrote: > I shared my original post here with RitLabs. There's not > much more I can or am willing to do. Providers/web masters who use ASAP! also block *all* messages coming from TB: http://www.commtouch.com I've had it happen to me three times jus

Regarding Scheduler

Questions: What should one normally do with scheduled Events after they have passed? Just delete them? Let them continue to build up? Is there a maximum file size? Will the list of events eventually begin to scroll automatically? -- Best regards, Jack mailto:[EMAIL

Re[3]: Message create date

Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 12:52:16 PM, you wrote: RG>> TB wants a text file to import address books from but I've not yet found RG>> how to export address books TO text from either competing email app. > Did you try Dawn yet (freeware)? > http://www.joshie.com/projects/dawn/ > Or is this not

Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

Monday, September 15, 2003, 9:30:10 PM, you wrote: >> Shouldn't there be a way to set the default opening tab? > Maybe. But that would be a wishlist item and not a bug report. ;-) I agree. I was just mumbling to myself. :) -- Best regards, Jack _

Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

Monday, September 15, 2003, 10:34:24 PM, you wrote: > Well, we have different needs here, so I agree that whether or not the > file should be deleted when the pad is deleted thought be optional. > Setting in SmartBat itself: > 1.) Delete text file when pad is deleted > 2.) Keep text file when pad

Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 5:05:29 AM, you wrote: > Hello Jack, > Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 2:17:30 AM, you wrote: JM>> Now try to delete it. Good luck with that! > Where is the 'Delete pad' command. I can only find a 'Close pad' under the > context menu? I have a 'Delete' option only und

Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

Monday, September 15, 2003, 8:41:24 PM, you wrote: > Confirmed. When you report it to backtrack, please advise the Bug ID > number for those of us who want to keep an eye on it. I haven't reported anything, because I'm not even sure what to report yet. -- Best regards, Jack

Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

Monday, September 15, 2003, 8:41:24 PM, you wrote: > I didn't try the cruise missile thing, so that part is not > confirmed... By MS Explorer, I guess you mean windows Explorer and not > Internet Explorer, Yup. Sorry about that. > and I used total Commander instead and deleted the > file while T

Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

Monday, September 15, 2003, 8:31:01 PM, you wrote: > Hello Jack, > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 you wrote in > >> First, create a "new pad" in SmartBat. For example, a new pad named >> "Clips." >> Now try to delete it. Good luck with that! > If you use "Close pad" instead, the

More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

First, create a "new pad" in SmartBat. For example, a new pad named "Clips." Now try to delete it. Good luck with that! It will remain in the SmartBat's tabular index no matter what you do. You can even fire a cruise missile at it, totally destroying it via Microsoft Explorer, but it will *stil

Re[2]: Scheduler problems

Sunday, September 14, 2003, 1:35:16 AM, you wrote: [...] >> Any ideas about why I'm only getting the Reminder window, and nothing >> else? > Just guessing: A bug? If anyone knows a work around, I'd be interested > as well ... Here's what I don't get, Peter. A "bug," at least to my way of thinkin

Scheduler problems

Whenever I assign a sound file (.wav) to be played to alert me to a scheduled event, all I get is the Reminder window/notification. No sound whatsoever. No matter how I configure Notification Parameters (I've tried every conceivable combination). Additionally, I can't get programs (*any* progra

Re[2]: Two thougths

Monday, September 8, 2003, 8:20:12 PM, you wrote: JM>> The message copies/moves just fine, but the count doesn't change, etc. > I'll trade that for the bug that keeps the account mailbox from > updating when new mail arrives. Since I have no faith it the counters > anymore I'm compelled to manual

Re[2]: Two thougths

Monday, September 8, 2003, 5:43:21 PM, you wrote: > Jack Morrison, [JM] wrote: JM>> When copying or moving a message from one folder to another, JM>> sometimes the message *count* in the receiving folder doesn't change JM>> until after you close and then re-open

Re[2]: Two thougths

Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:43:25 PM, you wrote: >I have yet to see any bugs in v2.0 after > using it extensively since the full release. I think I just found one. When copying or moving a message from one folder to another, sometimes the message *count* in the receiving folder doesn't change u

Re[5]: Feature requests

Sunday, September 7, 2003, 9:35:42 PM, you wrote: > Well, in fact, old event database will rewrite the current one. So, > it's supposed to work only with a "fresh" system now... Gotcha. I'm back to the old data. So if I back up daily, I'm only out one day of events? >>> SmarBat contents is not

Re[3]: Feature requests

Sunday, September 7, 2003, 7:32:39 PM, you wrote: > Hello Jack, JM>> Can I be confident that v2.0 backup/restore includes the Scheduler and JM>> SmartBat? > Scheduler should be backed up OK, as far as I remember - it was in the > beginning of the Beta series it appeared and I remember I was doin

Re: Feature requests

Sunday, September 7, 2003, 7:09:21 AM, you wrote: > Where do we go on the web or who do we email to suggest new features? I'd > like a Backup option for the Scheduler Actions to automate The Bat's backups. Which reminds me...I've never had to restore a backup of v2.0. Can I be confident that v2

  1   2   >